Advertisement

An Early History of Alexander Crum Brown’s Graphical Formulas

  • Christopher Ritter
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 222)

Abstract

Chemical structure and atomism were lively topics for chemists in the 1860s. Yet the central achievement of intercalated theoretical, laboratory, and didactic practices of chemistry in that decade was neither structure theory nor a triumph of atomism. Instead, a project that was crucial to the subsequent success of chemical structure and atomism made a large step in its ongoing development. This was the stabilization and production of chemical knowledge on the page. After 1861 the core of this project came to involve the graphical formulas of Alexander Crum Brown, which became “Frankland’s notation,” which became modern structural notation. This account of the early trajectory of Crum Brown’s graphical formulas focuses on how those formulas became paper tools.

Keywords

Fumaric Acid Glycolic Acid Type Formula Structural Notation Chemical Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, Alexander Crum. “On the Theory of Chemical Combination.” M.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1861.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, Alexander Crum. “On the Theory of Isomeric Compounds.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 23, no. 3 (1864): 707–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, Alexander Crum “On the Classification of Chemical Substances, by means of Generic Radicals.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 24, no. 2 (1865–66): 331–39.Google Scholar
  4. Couper, Archibald Scott. Comptes rendus 46 (1858): 1157–60.Google Scholar
  5. Crosland, Maurice P. Historical Studies in the Language of Chemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  6. Dalton, John. A New System of Chemical Philosophy. Manchester: S. Russell, 1808.Google Scholar
  7. Frankland, Edward. Lecture Notes for Chemical Students: Embracing Mineral and Organic Chemistry. London: John Van Voorst, 1866.Google Scholar
  8. Frankland, Edward. Lecture Notes for Chemical Students: Embracing Mineral and Organic Chemistry. 2d ed. London: John Van Voorst, 1872.Google Scholar
  9. Frankland, Edward Experimental Researches in Pure, Applied and Physical Chemistry. London: John Van Voorst, 1877.Google Scholar
  10. Frankland, Edward, and Baldwin Francis Duppa. “Synthetical Researches on Ethers. No. 2. Action of Sodium and lsopropylic Iodide upon Ethylic Acetate.” Journal of the Chemical Society 20 (1867): 102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geoffroy, Etienne François. “Table des differentes rapports observes en Chimie entre differentes substances.” Académie des Sciences (1718): h 35–7, m 202–12.Google Scholar
  12. Guyton de Morveau, Louis-Bernard et al. Méthode de nomenclature chimique. Paris: Cuchet, 1787.Google Scholar
  13. Guyton de Morveau. Method of Chymical Nomenclature. Translated by James St. John. London: G. Kearsley, 1788.Google Scholar
  14. Klein, Ursula. “Paper Tools in Experimental Cultures.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32, no. 2 (2001): 265–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larder, David F. “Alexander Crum Brown and His Doctoral Thesis of 1861.” Ambix 14 (1967): 112–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lavoisier, Antoine Laurent, Claude Louis Berthollet, and Antoine François de Fourcroy. “Rapport sur les nouveaux Caractères chimiques.” In Méthode de nomenclature chimique, edited by Louis-Bernard Guyton de Morveau et al. Paris: Cuchet, 1787.Google Scholar
  17. Memel, Christoph. “Modelling a Visual Language for Chemistry, 1860–1875.” Paper presented at the Conference: Types of Paper Tools and Traditions of Representations in the History of Chemistry, MPIWG Berlin 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Partington, James Riddick. A History of Chemistry. Vol. 4. London: Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Corrected ed. London: Routledge Kegan Paul, 1962.Google Scholar
  20. Rocke, Alan J. “Subatomic Speculations on the Origin of Structure Theory.” Ambix 30 (1983): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rocke, Alan J. Chemical Atomism in the Nineteenth Century: From Dalton to Cannic:aro. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  22. Rocke, Alan J. Nationali_ing Science: Adolphe Wurt: and the Battle for French Chemistry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. Russell, Colin Archibald. Edward Frankland: Chemistry, Controversy, and Conspiracy in Victorian England. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, Edward. Elements of Chemistry: Including the Recent Discoveries and Doctrines of the Science. 4th ed. London: John Taylor, 1833.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Ritter
    • 1
  1. 1.Office for History of Science and TechnologyUniversity of CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations