Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 222))

Abstract

The term paper tool as well as similar ones like conceptual tools, tools of representation, and tool-box of science, have begun to creep into the literature, especially in the history of science. The first of these terms, paper tools, was coined by Ursula Klein (Klein, “Berzelian Formulas”). The other terms I mention, which evoke similar ideas have been used by the likes of Bruno Latour, Jed Buchwald and Nancy Cartwright in spite of their widely diverging philosophical orientations. In addition terms like “tools of representation” are sometimes used by scientists, in particular in the computational sciences. Since one theme of this volume is `paper tools in chemistry and other experimental science’ I will try to say a few words about how I interpret this phrase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bensaude-Vincent, B. “Mendeleev’s Periodic System of the Elements.” British Journal for the History of Science 19 (1986): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bills, J. L. “Experimental 4s and 3d Energies in Atomic Ground States.” Journal of Chemical Education 75 (1998): 589–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, M. Atomic Physics, Dover Reprint Series. First published in 1935 by Blackie and Son, Glasgow. New York: Dover, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G. “Dynamics of Theory Change: The Role of Predictions.” In Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Vol. 2, Symposia and Invited Papers, edited by D. Hull, M. Forbes and R. M. Burian. East Lansing Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G.“The Reception of Mendeleev’s Periodic Law in America and in Britain.” /sis 87 (1996): 595–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. R. What Is Science? New York: Dover, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Translated by P. Wiener. New York: Athaneum Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K. “The Quantum Mechanical Explanation of the Periodic System.” Journal of Chemical Education 76 (1999): 1189–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gmelin, L. Handbuch der Chemie. 4th ed. Heidelberg: Karl Winter, 1843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. Models and Analogies in Science. South Bend, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D., M. Forbes, and R. M. Burian, eds. Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial’ Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Vol. 2, Symposia and Invited Papers. East Lansing Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janich, P., and N. Psarros, eds. Die Sprache der Chemie. Würzburg: Kbninghausen & Neumann, 1996. Klein, U. “Berzelian Formulas as Paper Tools in Early Nineteenth-Century Chemistry.” Foundations of Chemistry 3, no. 1 (2001): 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. “Prediction and Prejudice.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1990): 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazurs, E. One Hundred Years of Graphic Representation of the Periodic System. Tuscaloosa: Alabama University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeleev, D. I. The Principles of Chemistry. London: Longman’s, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. G. “Relative Energies of 3d and 4s Orbitals.” Education in Chemistry 29 (1992): 84–85. Pilar, F. L. “4s Is Always above 3d!” Journal of Chemical Education 55 (1978): 2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, A. J. “Atoms and Equivalents: The Early Development of the Chemical Atomic Theory.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 9 (1978): 225–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, A. J. Chemical Atomism in the Nineteenth Century: From Dalton to Canni Columbus: OhioState University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. R. “Transition Metal Configurations and Limitations of the Orbital Approximation.” Journal of Chemical Education 66 (1989): 481–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. R. “Stephen Brush, the Periodic Table and the Nature of Chemistry.” In Die Sprache der Chemie,edited by P. Janich and N. Psarros. Würzburg: Kóninghausen & Neumann, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. R. “The Periodic Table and the Electron.” American Scientist 85 (1997): 546–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. R. “The Evolution of the Periodic System.” Scientific American 279 (1998): 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. R. “How Good Is the Quantum Mechanical Explanation of the Periodic System?” Journal of Chemical Education 75 (1998): 1384–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. R. “The Quantum Mechanical Explanation of the Periodic System.” Journal of ChemicalEducation 76 (1999): 1189–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. R., and J. Worrall. “Prediction and the Periodic System.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spronsen, J. W. van. The Periodic System of Chemical Elements: A History of the First Hundred Years. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanquickenborne, L. G., K. Pierloot, and D. J. Devoghel. “Transition Metals and the Aufbau Principle.” Journal of Chemical Education 71 (1994): 469–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scerri, E. (2001). The Periodic Table: The Ultimate Paper Tool in Chemistry. In: Klein, U. (eds) Tools and Modes of Representation in the Laboratory Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 222. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9737-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9737-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5859-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9737-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics