Skip to main content
Book cover

Explanation pp 93–120Cite as

Is Explanation a Guide to Inference? A Reply to Wesley C. Salmon

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 302))

Abstract

Earlier in this volume, Wesley Salmon has given a characteristically clear and trenchant critique of the account of non-demonstrative reasoning known by the slogan ‘Inference to the Best Explanation’. As a long-time fan of the idea that explanatory considerations are a guide to inference, I was delighted by the suggestion that Wes and I might work together on a discussion of the issues. In the event, this project has exceeded my high expectations, for in addition to the intellectual gain that comes from the careful study of his essay, I have benefited enormously from the stream of illuminating emails and faxes that Wes has sent me during our collaboration. Doing philosophy together has been an education and a pleasure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cartwright, N., (1983). How the Laws of Physics lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodman, N., (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th ed. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harman, G., (1965). “The Inference to the Best Explanation”, The Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hempel, C., (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hume, D., (1777). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, L.A. Selby-Bigg and P.H. Nidditch (eds.), 1975. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lipton, P., (1991). Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lipton, P., (1993). “Contrastive Explanation”, in D. Hillel Ruben (ed.), Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peirce, C., (1931). Collected Papers. C. Hartshorn and P. Weiss (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sober, E., (1988). Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thagard, P., (1978). “The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice”, The Journal of Philosophy, 75: 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van Fraassen, B., (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lipton, P. (2001). Is Explanation a Guide to Inference? A Reply to Wesley C. Salmon. In: Hon, G., Rakover, S.S. (eds) Explanation. Synthese Library, vol 302. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9731-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9731-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5827-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9731-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics