Advertisement

Explanation pp 61-91 | Cite as

Explanation and Confirmation: A Bayesian Critique of Inference to the Best Explanation

Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 302)

Abstract

When I first presented a version of this paper in Leipzig, Germany, in 1996, Europe was deeply embroiled in the problem of “mad cow disease” (spongiform encephalopathy), which had afflicted many British cattle. Ten cases of a rare brain disease in humans (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease — CJD) had been attributed to the consumption of infected beef, because that was taken by medical scientists as the best available explanation of certain special characteristics of these particular cases. The political and economic ramifications throughout the European Union were enormous.1

Keywords

Prior Probability Good Explanation Scientific Explanation Functional Explanation Receive View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Aristotle 1928]
    Aristotle, (1928). Analytica Posteriora, in W. D. Ross (ed.), The Works of Aristotle, vol. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. [Barrow and Tipler 1986]
    Barrow, J., and Tipler, F., (1986). The Cosmological Anthropic Principle, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. [Carnap 1950]
    Carnap, R., (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. [Copi 1986]
    Copi, I., (1986). Introduction to Logic, 7th ed., New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. [Day and Kincaid 1994]
    Day, T., and Kincaid, H., (1994). “Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in its Place”, Synthese, 98: 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [Dray 1966]
    Dray, W., (1966). Philosophical Analysis and History, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. [Giere 1984]
    Giere, R., (1984). Understanding Scientific Reasonong, 2nd ed., New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  8. [Harman 1965]
    Harman, G., (1965). “Inference to the Best Explanation”, Philosophical Review, 74: 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [Hempel 1942]
    Hempel, C. G., (1942). “The Function of General Laws in History”, Journal of Philosophy, 39: 35–48. Reprinted in [Hempel 1965].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [Hempel 1959]
    Hempel, C. G., (1959). “The Logic of Functional Analysis,” in L. Gross, (ed.), Symposium on Sociological Theory, New York: Harper and Row, 271–307.Google Scholar
  11. [Hempel 1965]
    Hempel, C. G., (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. [Hempel 1965a]
    Hempel, C. G., (1965a). “Aspects of Scientific Explanation”, in [Hempel 1965], 331–496.Google Scholar
  13. [Hempel 1966]
    Hempel, C. G., (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. [Hempel and Oppenheim 1948]
    Hempel, C. G., and Oppenheim, P., (1948) “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, 15: 135–175. Reprintedin [Hempel 1965].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [Howson and Urbach 1989]
    Howson, C., and Urbach, P., (1989). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
  16. [Irving and Harrington 1973]
    Irving, W., and Harrington, C., (1973). “Upper Pleistocene radiocarbon-dated artifacts from the northern Yukon”, Science, vol. 179, no. 4071: 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [Lipton 1991]
    Lipton, P., (1991). Inference to the Best Explanation, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. [Mayo 1996]
    Mayo, D., (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [Mill 1843]
    Mill, J. S., (1843). A System of Logic, London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
  20. [Nye 1972]
    Nye, M. J., (1972). Molecular Reality, London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
  21. [Perrin 1913]
    Perrin, J., (1913). Les Atomes, Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  22. [Popper 1935]
    Popper, K., (1935). Logik der Forschung, Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. [Reichenbach 1949]
    Reichenbach, H., (1949). The Theory ofProbability, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. [Reichenbach 1956]
    Reichenbach, H., (1956). The Direction of Time, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. [M. Salmon 1982]
    Salmon, M., (1982). Philosophy and Archaeology, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. [W. Salmon 1984]
    Salmon, W., (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. [W. Salmon 1990]
    Salmon, W. (1990). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  28. [W. Salmon 1998]
    Salmon, W. (1998). Causality and Explanation, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [Scriven 1966]
    Scriven, M., (1966). “Causes, Connections, and Conditions in History”, in [Dray 1966], 238–264.Google Scholar
  30. [Wright 1976]
    Wright, L., (1976). Teleological Explanations, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations