Abstract
In the history of modem philosophy Kant is often described as the arch-epistemologist, taking a “Critical turn” through the construction of a grand synthesis of the rationalist and empiricist traditions, which emphasise either reason or the senses (respectively) as the exclusive source of knowledge, by arguing that “[w]ithout sensibility, no object would be given to us, and without understanding none would be thought... Only from their unification can cognition arise” (Kant, Critique of Pure Reason [CPR], A51/B75).1 As apt as this description of Kant qua pure epistemologist may be, it is clear that it must be supplemented in many ways. In addition to his revolutionary work outside theoretical philosophy in ethics and aesthetics, Kant is particularly interested in physics throughout his career. Although Kant’s epistemology influences his physics in significant ways2, it is important to consider questions that arise at the level of physics in order to see that his epistemology does not contribute to the resolution of all such questions all by itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Descartes, René. Principia Philosophiae. Amsterdam: Ludovicum Elzevirium. 1644.
Hume. David. Enquiries concerning the human understanding (1748. posthumously ed. 1777). ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon. 1961.
Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. by (Königlich) Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften and (Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (der DDR). 29 vols... Berlin: Leipzig: Akademie-Verlag. 1910–1983 [AA].
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. and transi, by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 1998. [CPR]
Langton, Rae. Kantian Humility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Leibniz. Gottfried Wilhelm, htathematische Schriften, ed. by C. I. Gerhardt. Vols. 1–7 (1849–63). Hildesheim: Olms. 1962. [GM]
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophische Schriften, ed. by C. I. Gerhardt. Vols. 1–7 (1875–90). Hildesheim: Olms, 1960–61. [GP]
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Essays, transi. By R. Ariew and D. Garber. Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. 1989. [PhE]
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. [Discours de métaphysique] (1686). [GP IV 427–63. PhE 35–68]
Leibniz. Gottfried Wilhelm. “Brevis demonstratio erroris memorabilis Cartesii et aliorum circa legem naturae.” Acta eruditorum March 1686. [GM VI 117–19]
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Syteme nouveau de la nature et de la communication de substances, aussi bien que de l’union qu’il y a entre Lame et le corps.” Journal des savants June 1695. [GP IV 477–87. PhE 138–144]
Leibniz. Gottfried Wilhelm. Specimen Dynamicum (1695). Part I Acta eruditorum April 1695. [GM VI 234–54, PhE 117–138]
Leibniz. Gottfried Wilhelm. “From the Letters to Arnauld.” Philosophical Essays, transi. By R. Ariew and D. Garber. 69–90. Indianapolis: Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. 1989.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding. London: printed for Th. Basset, and sold by Edw. Mory. 1690.
Newton, Isaac. Philosophioae naturalis principia mathematica. London: J. Streater. 1687.
Newton. Issac. Opticks: Or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions. Inflections and Co/ours of Light. 4th ed., London: printed for William Innys, 1730.
Warren, Daniel “Kant’s Dynamics.” Kant and the Sciences, ed. Eric Watkins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Watkins, Eric. “Kant’s Theory of Physical Influx.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77 (1995): 285–324.
Watkins, Eric. “The Argumentative Structure of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (1998): 567–593.
Watkins. Eric. “Kant’s Justification of the Laws of Mechanics.” Studies in the History of Philosophy of Science 29 (1998): 539–560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watkins, E. (2001). Kant on Extension and Force: Critical Appropriations of Leibniz and Newton. In: Lefèvre, W. (eds) Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 220. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9729-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9729-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5774-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9729-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive