Skip to main content

Kant on Extension and Force: Critical Appropriations of Leibniz and Newton

  • Chapter
Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 220))

Abstract

In the history of modem philosophy Kant is often described as the arch-epistemologist, taking a “Critical turn” through the construction of a grand synthesis of the rationalist and empiricist traditions, which emphasise either reason or the senses (respectively) as the exclusive source of knowledge, by arguing that “[w]ithout sensibility, no object would be given to us, and without understanding none would be thought... Only from their unification can cognition arise” (Kant, Critique of Pure Reason [CPR], A51/B75).1 As apt as this description of Kant qua pure epistemologist may be, it is clear that it must be supplemented in many ways. In addition to his revolutionary work outside theoretical philosophy in ethics and aesthetics, Kant is particularly interested in physics throughout his career. Although Kant’s epistemology influences his physics in significant ways2, it is important to consider questions that arise at the level of physics in order to see that his epistemology does not contribute to the resolution of all such questions all by itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Descartes, René. Principia Philosophiae. Amsterdam: Ludovicum Elzevirium. 1644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume. David. Enquiries concerning the human understanding (1748. posthumously ed. 1777). ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon. 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. by (Königlich) Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften and (Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (der DDR). 29 vols... Berlin: Leipzig: Akademie-Verlag. 1910–1983 [AA].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. and transi, by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 1998. [CPR]

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Rae. Kantian Humility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz. Gottfried Wilhelm, htathematische Schriften, ed. by C. I. Gerhardt. Vols. 1–7 (1849–63). Hildesheim: Olms. 1962. [GM]

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophische Schriften, ed. by C. I. Gerhardt. Vols. 1–7 (1875–90). Hildesheim: Olms, 1960–61. [GP]

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Essays, transi. By R. Ariew and D. Garber. Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. 1989. [PhE]

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. [Discours de métaphysique] (1686). [GP IV 427–63. PhE 35–68]

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz. Gottfried Wilhelm. “Brevis demonstratio erroris memorabilis Cartesii et aliorum circa legem naturae.” Acta eruditorum March 1686. [GM VI 117–19]

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Syteme nouveau de la nature et de la communication de substances, aussi bien que de l’union qu’il y a entre Lame et le corps.” Journal des savants June 1695. [GP IV 477–87. PhE 138–144]

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz. Gottfried Wilhelm. Specimen Dynamicum (1695). Part I Acta eruditorum April 1695. [GM VI 234–54, PhE 117–138]

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz. Gottfried Wilhelm. “From the Letters to Arnauld.” Philosophical Essays, transi. By R. Ariew and D. Garber. 69–90. Indianapolis: Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding. London: printed for Th. Basset, and sold by Edw. Mory. 1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac. Philosophioae naturalis principia mathematica. London: J. Streater. 1687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton. Issac. Opticks: Or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions. Inflections and Co/ours of Light. 4th ed., London: printed for William Innys, 1730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Daniel “Kant’s Dynamics.” Kant and the Sciences, ed. Eric Watkins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Eric. “Kant’s Theory of Physical Influx.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77 (1995): 285–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Eric. “The Argumentative Structure of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (1998): 567–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins. Eric. “Kant’s Justification of the Laws of Mechanics.” Studies in the History of Philosophy of Science 29 (1998): 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watkins, E. (2001). Kant on Extension and Force: Critical Appropriations of Leibniz and Newton. In: Lefèvre, W. (eds) Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 220. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9729-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9729-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5774-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9729-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics