Skip to main content

Consequence and Rules of Consequence in the Post-Ockham Period

  • Chapter
Medieval Formal Logic

Part of the book series: The New Synthese Historical Library ((SYNL,volume 49))

Abstract

Late medieval logicians after 1350 continued to be concerned with a cluster of topics connected with the idea of logical inference. Their efforts revolved around the following topics: (a) the nature of consequence in general and of sub-types of consequence; (b) the criteria of valid or sound consequence; (c) the most general propositional rules including those governing modal, epistemic, and obligational realms; (d) the problem with the so-called Ex impossibili -rule: ‘From any impossible proposition any other proposition follows’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashworth, E. J., 1973. “The Theory of Consequence in the Late Fifteenth Century,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14/3, 289–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J., 1979. “The Libelli Sophistarum and the Use of Medieval Logic Texts at Oxford and Cambridge in the Early Sixteenth Century,” Vivarium 17, 134–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E.J., 1985. “English Obligationes Texts after Roger Swyneshed: The Tracts beginning `Obligatio est quaedam ars,”’ in O. Lewry, (ed.), The Rise of British Logic, (Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7), Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J., 1992. “New Light on Medieval Philosophy: The Sophismata of Richard Kilvington,” Dialogue 31, 517–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J., and Spade, P. V., 1992. “Logic in Medieval Oxford,” in J. I. Catto and Ralph Evans, (eds.), The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 35–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boh, Ivan, 1993. Epistemic Logic in the Later Middle Ages,London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadie, Alexander, 1993. “Assent in Inference Theory,” in Jacobi 1993, 637–652. Buridan, John, 1976. bannis Buridan: Tractatus de Consequentiis, (ed.) Hubert Hubien, Louvain, Publications Universitaries.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ors, Angel, 1981. “En Torno a la Una Figura de Oposición de Proposiciones Hipoteticas Condicional y Consecuencia Intrinseca,” in Logica, Epistemologia y Teoría de la Ciencia, (Estudios de Educación, no. 9), Madrid, Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ors, Angel, 1983. “Las Summulae de Domingo de Soto,” Anuario Filosófico 16/1, 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ors, Angel, 1993. “Ex impossibili Quodlibet Sequitur (John Buridan),” in Jacobi 1993, 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ors, Angel, 1984. “Los limites de la regla `tollendo ponens’: Juan Versor y Lamberto del Monte,” Anuario Filosofico 17/1, 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ors, Angel, 1985. “La Doctrina de las Proposiciones Hipoteticas en la Logica de Pedro de Castrovol,” Antonianum 60, 120–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, Klaus, (ed.) 1993. Argumentationstheorie. Scholastische Forschungen zu den logischen und semantischen Regeln korrekten Folgerns, (Studien und Texte zur Geisteggeschichte des Mittelatems, Bd. 38 ), Leiden/New York/Köln, E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Peter, 1985. Jean Buridan’s Logic: The Treatise on Supposition and the Treatise on Consequences, Dordrecht, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, Simo, 1981. “The Emergence of Deontic Logic in the Fourteenth Century,” in R. Hilpinen (ed.), New Essays on Deontic Logic, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 225–248.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, Simo, 1993. “Über praktische Argumentation und Logik des Wollens im Mittelalter,” in Jacobi 1993, 607–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, S. and Yrjönsuuri, M., 1988. “Norms and Action in Obligational Disputations,” in O. Pluta (ed.), Die Philosophie im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert,(Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 10), Amsterdam, Grüner, 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maierù, Alfonso, 1983. English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries, Atlantic Highland, Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, Ernst A., 1953. Truth and Consequence in Mediaeval Logic, Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normore, Calvin, 1990. “Doxology and the History of Philosophy,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 16, 203–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normore, Calvin, 1993. “The Necessity in Deduction: Cartesian Inference and its Medieval Background,” Synthese 96, 437-454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul of Pergula, 1961. Logica and Tractatus de Sensu Composito et Diviso, (ed.) M. A. Brown, St. Bonaventure, N.Y., The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter of Mantua, 1492. Logica Petri Mantuani, Venice, Simon Berilaqua

    Google Scholar 

  • Pluta, Olaf, (ed.) 1988. Die Philosophie im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert, (Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 10), Amsterdam, Grüner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzi, Lorenzo, 1978. Le Consequentiae nella Logica Medievale, Padova, Liviana Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Stephen, 1993. “Formal and Material Consequence, Disjunctive Syllogism and Gamma,” in Jacobi 1993, 233–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaton, Wallace K., 1973. An Edition and Translation of the “Tractatus de Consequentias” by Ralph Strode, FourteenthCentury Logician and Friend of Geoffrey Chaucer (Ph. D. Dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley 1973), Ann Arbor, Mich., University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto, Domingo de, 1554. Summulae (2nd.ed.), Salamanca, 1554. ( Reprint: Hildesheim, Georg Olms 1980 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strode, Ralph, 1484, Consequentie Strodi,Venice.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boh, I. (2001). Consequence and Rules of Consequence in the Post-Ockham Period. In: Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds) Medieval Formal Logic. The New Synthese Historical Library, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9713-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9713-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5604-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9713-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics