Abstract
The best efforts of some of the best historians of logic have failed to find a clear source in material inherited from the ancient world for the earliest mediaeval discussions of the Liar paradox.1 The obvious candidates, and most importantly Aristotle’s reference to the puzzles of oath-breakers and liars in the Sophistical Refutations,seem to have been of little importance in the first theorising about insolubilia.2 Despite this I would like to suggest that there was at least a very distant cause in late antique logic for the appearance of the Liar and its relatives in the twelfth century. It cannot be emphasised enough, however, that twelfth century logicians devised the paradoxes for themselves and that their solutions were all their own work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abaelard, Peter, 1970. Dialectica, (ed.) L. M. de Rijk, Assen, Van Gorcum. Boethius, A. M. S., 1969. De Hypotheticis Syllogismis, (ed.) L. Obertello, Brescia, Paedia.
Burge, Tyler, 1979. “Semantical Paradox,” Journal of Philosophy 76, 169–98
Clarembald of Arras 1965. “Expositio Super Librum Boetii `De Hebdomadibus,”’ in Nikolaus Häring (ed.), Life and Works of Clarembald of Arras, Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
De Rijk, Lambertus Marie, 1962. Logica Modernorum, vol. 1, Assen, Van Gorcum.
De Rijk, Lambertus Marie, 1966. “Some notes on the Mediaeval tract De insolubilibus, with the edition of a tract dating from the end of the twelfth century,” Vivarium 4, 83–115.
De Rijk, Lambertus Marie, 1974. “Some Thirteenth Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation I,” Vivarium 12, 94–123.
De Rijk, Lambertus Marie, 1975. “Some Thirteenth Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation II,” Vivarium 13, 22–54.
De Rijk, Lambertus Marie, 1976. “Some Thirteenth Century Tracts on the Game of Obligation III,” Vivarium 14, 26–49.
Garlandus Compotista 1959. Dialectica, (ed.) L. M. de Rijk, Assen, Van Gorcum.
Harper, W. L., Stalnaker, R., and Pearce, G., (eds.) 1981. Ifs, Dordrecht, Reidel.
Hughes, George, 1982. John Buridan on Self-Reference: Chapter Eight of Buridan’s Sophismata, (An Edition and a Translation with an Introduction and a Philosophical Commentary), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Jacques of Vitry 1914. Die Exempla des Jakob von Vitry, (ed.) Joseph Graven, Heidelberg, Carl Winter.
Kripke, Saul, 1975. “Outline of a Theory of Truth,” The Journal of Philosophy 72, 690–716.
Martin, Christopher J., 1988. “Embarrassing Arguments and Surprising Conclusions in the Development of the Theory of the Conditional in the Twelfth Century,” in J. Jolivet & A. de Libera (eds.), Gilbert de Poitiers et ses Contemporains, Naples, Bibliopolis, 377–401.
Normore, Calvin, 1987, “Medieval Nominalism,” in J. Wippel (ed.), Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Washington D. C., Catholic University of America Press.
Spade, Paul Vincent, 1973. “The Origins of the Mediaeval Insolubilia Literature,” Franciscan Studies 33, 292–309. (Reprinted in Spade 1988.)
Spade, Paul Vincent, 1982. “Three Theories of Obligationes: Burley, Kilvington and Swyneshed on Counterfactual Reasoning,” History and Philosophy of Logic 3, 1–32.
Spade, Paul Vincent, 1987. “Five Early Theories in the Mediaeval Insolubilia Literature,” Vivarium 25, 24–46.
Spade, Paul Vincent, 1988. Lies, Language and Logic in the late Middle Ages, London, Variorum Reprints.
Spade, Paul Vincent, and Stump, Eleonore, 1983. “Walter Burley and the Obligationes Attributed to William Sherwood,” History and Philosophy of Logic 4, 9–26.
Stump, Eleonore, 1980 “William of Sherwood’s Treatise On Obligations,” Historiographia Linguistica 7: 1/2, 249–264.
Stump, Eleonore, 1981. “Roger Swyneshed’s Theory Of Obligations,” Medioevo 7, 135–174.
Thierry of Chartres 1971. “Commentum Super Ebdomadas Boetii,” in Nikolaus Häring (ed.), Commentaries on Boethius by Thierry of Chartres and his School, Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Yagisawa, Takashi, 1988. “Beyond Possible Worlds,” Philosophical Studies 53, 171–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martin, C.J. (2001). Obligations and Liars. In: Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds) Medieval Formal Logic. The New Synthese Historical Library, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9713-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9713-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5604-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9713-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive