Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 38))

  • 382 Accesses

Abstract

The case studies presented in this chapter illustrate aspects of distributed hydrologic modeling using GIS. The main advantage of distributed modeling is that the spatial variation of parameters and rainfall input is incorporated into the model response. Each parameter and rainfall input has its own spatial variability, which can be characterized by informational entropy (see Chapter 4). Lumping of the parameter, i.e., taking the mean of a parameter for a particular sub-basin, may or may not have important consequences on the hydrograph response of the model. If the parameter has a narrow range of variation or the parameter has only a few values represented in the basin, then lumping may have little effect. Homogeneous land surface/cover or uniform soil properties result in low informational entropy, meaning that average values are suitable. Where large spatial variability exists, lumping will have important effects. If we lump a parameter by replacing the spatially variable parameter map with a mean value, we still have spatially distributed runoff routing. The effect of lumping a parameter within the context of distributed routing demonstrates the relative importance of the spatial variability of each parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chow, V.T., D.R. Maidment and L.W. Mays (1988), Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, pp. 134–135.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeVantier and Feldman (1993), “Review of GIS Applications in Hydrologic Modeling.” J. of Water Resources Planning and Management, 119 (2), pp. 246–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dutnell, R.C. (2000), Development of Bankfull Discharge and Channel Geometry Relationships for Natural Channel Design in Oklahoma Using a Fluvial Geomorphic Approach. Submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Masters of Science, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, pp. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loague, K.M. and R.A. Freeze, (1985). “A Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Techniques on Small Upland Catchments.”Water Resources Research,21(2), pp. 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vieux, B.E. (2001). Distributed Modeling Case Studies. In: Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9710-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9710-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-9712-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9710-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics