Skip to main content

Complementary Care in the United States

  • Chapter
  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

The question is no longer WHETHER or not complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) will be integrated into the mainstream of conventional healthcare delivery but HOW? Historically the relationship between conventional Western medicine and CAM for the past century has generally vacillated between skepticism and outright hostility; this has not changed. However, steadily increasing consumer demand for CAM, cost/benefit awareness, and a recognition of the limits of conventional western medicine are driving the process of integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC; “Trends in Alternative Medicine Use in the United States, 1990–1997”; JAMA, November 11, 1998 Vol. 280, No. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenberg, DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. “Unconventional Medicine in the United States. Prevalence, Costs, and Patterns of Use.” The New England Journal of Medicine, January 28, 1993; Vol. 328: 246 – 252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kassirer, Jerome P., “Doctor Discontent”; The New England Journal of Medicine; Vol. 339(21), November 19, 1998, 1543 – 1545.

    Google Scholar 

  4. NIH. “Alternative Medicine: Expanding Medical Horizons” (US Government Printing Office, 1993), xli.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angell M, Kassirer J. Alternative Medicine — The Risks of Untested and Unregulated Remedies. N Eng J Med 1998; 339: 839 –841.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Institutes of Health, Office of Alternative Medicine. Grant award and research data Bethesda, Md.: OAM. (http://altmed.od.nih.gov/oam/research/grants)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fontanarosa P, Lundberg G. Complementary, Alternative, Unconventional, and Integrative Medicine: Call for Papers for the Annual Coordinated Theme Issues of the AMA Journals. JAMA 1997; 278 (23): 2111 – 2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiser M, Strösser W, Klein P. Homeopathic versus Conventional Treatment of Vertigo: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124: 879 – 885.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Linde K, Clausuis N, Ramierz G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges L, Jonas W Are the Clinical Effects of Homoeopathy Placebo Effects? A Meta-analysis of Placebo-controlled Trials. Lancet 1997; 350: 834 – 43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ornish D, Brown S Scherwitz L, Billings J, Armstrong W, Ports T, McLanahan R, Kirkeeide R, Brank R, Gould K: Can Lifestyle Changes Reverse cCoronary Heart Disease? Lancet 1990; 336: 129 – 133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor B, Calabrese C, Cardena E, Eisenberg D, Fincher J, Hufford D, Jonas W, Kaptchuk T, Martin S, Scott A, Zhang X: Panel on Definition and Description, CAM Research Methodology Conference, Defining and Describing Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Alternative Ther Health Med 1995; 3 (2): 49 – 57.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein M, Glik D, Use of and Satisfaction with Homeopathy in a Patient Population. Alternative Ther Health Med 1998; 4 (2): 60 – 65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Horton R, The Last Battle: Medicine’s Struggle with Complementary Therapy. Int Med 1998; 1 (1); 35 – 38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lazarou J, Pomeranz B, Corey P. Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients. A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. JA MA. 1998; 279: 1200 – 1205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Riley, D. (2001). Complementary Care in the United States. In: Willich, S.N., Elm, S. (eds) Medical Challenges for the New Millennium. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9708-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9708-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5685-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9708-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics