Advertisement

Health Care Ethics Committees

  • Christopher D. Melley
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 8)

Abstract

Sincere attempts at becoming more ethically responsive to individual and community needs, both in terms of increases in personal choice of individual patients and more general concerns in providing better health care to the public, sometimes take the form of an institutional addition to the existing health care structure. Health care ethics committees (HECs) are one such addition to the structure. Health care ethics committees have enjoyed rising popularity in North American, European, Commonwealth countries, and elsewhere, as an institutional means of helping to resolve moral problems in a variety of settings, primarily in direct medical care of patients and evaluation of research proposals. What are these committees? What are their various functions, methodologies, composition, and problems? How are we to understand and evaluate the emergence of these committees within the larger historical and intellectual context of applied philosophical ethics?

Keywords

Committee Member Research Proposal Ethic Consultation Health Care Staff Ethic Consultant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, C.L.: 1990, In medicine, ethics by committee. Insight/Washington Times, July 23; rpt. in Newsbank.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, E. van: 1987, Ethics committees in Minnesota hospitals. Minnesota Medicine 70: 79. American Hospital Association: 1984, Guidelines: Hospital committees on biomedical ethics. American Hospital Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Annas, G.J.: 1984, Ethics committees in neonatal care: Substantive protection or procedural diversion? American Journal of Public Health 74 (8): 843–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres, S.M.: 1984, When values compete: Ethics committees and consensus. Health Progress 351 (9098): 32–34.Google Scholar
  5. Bayley, C. and Cranford, R.E.: 1986, Ethics committees: What we all have learned. Reprinted in: Making choices: Ethics issues for health care professional. American Hospital Publishing, Inc., Chicago, IL., p. 193–199.Google Scholar
  6. Bouton, K.: 1990, Painful decisions: The role of the medical ethicist. The New York Times Magazine, August 5.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, B., Brown, A., Miles, S.H. and Aroskar, M.A.: 1987, The prevalence and design of ethics committees in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 35 (11): 1028–1033.Google Scholar
  8. Chadarévian, J.P. de: 1985, Letter to the editor. New England Journal of Medicine 312 (3): 188–189.Google Scholar
  9. Cranford, R.E.: 1986, quoted in: Hosford, B.: Bioethics committees: The health care providers’ guide. Aspen Publication, Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar
  10. Farley, M.A.: 1984, Institutional ethics committees as social justice advocates. Health Progress, October. 32 ff.Google Scholar
  11. Fleischman, A.: 1987, Bioethical committees in perinatology. Clinics in Perinatology 14 (2): 379–393.Google Scholar
  12. Fleischman, A.R. and Roden, N.K.: 1988: Perinatal law and ethics rounds. Obstetrics & Gynecology 71 (5): 790–795.Google Scholar
  13. Fost, N.: 1985, Hospital ethics committees: Administrative aspects. JAMA 253 (18): 2687–2692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gambia Govemment/Medical Research Council Joint Ethical Committee: 1998, Ethical issues facing medical research in developing countries. The Lancet, January 24: 286.Google Scholar
  15. Gerber, P.: 1988: Ethics and drug trials, editorial. The Medical Journal of Australia 179: 229–230.Google Scholar
  16. Glaser, J.W.: 1989, Hospital ethics committees: One of many centers of responsibility. Theoretical Medicine 10 (4): 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorovitz, S.: 1988, The viewpoint of the ethicist. In: Bankowski, Z. and Bryant, J.H. (eds), Health policy, ethics and human values: European and North American perspectives, conference highlights, papers and conclusions. World Health Organisation, Geneva, p. 187–190.Google Scholar
  18. Gorovitz, H.: 1998, An viewpoint of the ethicist. In: Bankowski, N. and Bryant, J.H. (eds), Health policy, ethics and human values: European and North American perspectives, conference highlights, papers and conclusions. p. 187–190.Google Scholar
  19. Have, H. ten and Janssens, R.: 1997, Regulating euthanasia in The Netherlands. HEC Forum 9 (4): 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Häyry, H.: 1998, Should the decisions of ethics committees be based on community values? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal 1 (1): 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, D.E. and Thompson, T.R.: 1984, The ‘Baby Doe’ rule: Is it all bad? Pediatrics Kliegman, R., Mahowald, M.B. et al: 1986, In our best interests: Experience and the workings of an ethics review committee. The Journal of Pediatrics 108(2): 178–188.Google Scholar
  22. Kurp, P.: 1988, For `God Squads’, a matter of life and death. Albany, New York Knickerbocker News, March 29; rpt. in Newsbank.Google Scholar
  23. Larcher, V.F. et al: 1997, Pediatrics at the cutting edge: Do we need clinical ethics committees. Journal of Medical Ethics 23(4): 245–250.Google Scholar
  24. Lo, B.: 1987, Behind closed doors: Promises and pitfalls of ethics committees. New England Journal of Medicine 317(1).Google Scholar
  25. Lyon, J.: 1985, Playing God in the nursery. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Macklin, R.: 1987, Mortal choices: Bioethics in today’s world. Pantheon Books, New York. Mahowald, M.B.: 1989, Hospital ethics committees: Diverse and problematic. HEC Forum 1(5): 237–246.Google Scholar
  27. McCormick, R.A.: 1984, Ethics committees: Promise or peril? Law Medicine & Health Care 12(4): 150–155.Google Scholar
  28. Michaels, R. and Oliver, T.K., Jr 1986, Human right consultation: A 12-year experience of a pediatric bioethics committee. Pediatrics 78 (4): 566–572.Google Scholar
  29. Murase, T.: 1986, Concerning the establishment of bioethics forum. The Journal of the Japan Medical Association 96(5): 989–92Google Scholar
  30. Sakai, A.: 1989, The present status of ethics committees in Japan’s 80 medical schools. HEC Forum 1 (4): 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Society of Patient Representatives Survey on Institutional Ethics Committees: August 1983.Google Scholar
  32. Neuberger, J.: 1992, Ethics and health care: the role of research ethics committees in the United Kingdom. Research report no 12. Kings Fund, London.Google Scholar
  33. Nicholson, R.H.: 1998, Seeking harmony in discord. Hastings Center Report 28 (1): 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paris, JJ. and Reardon, F.E.: 1986, Ethics committees in critical care. Critical Care Clinics 2 (1): 111–121.Google Scholar
  35. Perkins, H.S. and Saathoff, B.S.: 1988, Impact of medical ethics consultation on physicians: An exploratory study. The American Journal of Medicine 85: 761–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: 1983, Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: Ethica4 medical and legal issues in treatment decisions. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  37. Puma, J. La: 1987, Ethics by committee? Letter to the editor. New England Journal of Medicine 317 (22): 1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Puma, J. La and Toulmin, S.: 1989, Ethics consultants and ethics committees. Archives of Internal Medicine 149: 1109–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robertson, J.A.: 1984, Committees as decision makers: Alternative structures and responsibilities. In: Cranford, R. and Doudera, A.E. (eds.), Institutional ethics committees and health care decision making. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, p. 85–95.Google Scholar
  40. Roelofs, R.: 1980, Reflections of a philosophical bureaucrat. In: Ruddick, W. (ed.), Philosophers in medical centers. The Society for Philosophy and Public Affairs, New York, p. 25–49.Google Scholar
  41. Sherman, S.R.: 1984, Ethical implications of clinical judgments: The role of the Hospital Bioethic Committee (editorial). Connecticut Medicine 48(2): 131–132.Google Scholar
  42. Siegler, M.: 1986, Ethics committees: Decisions by bureaucracy. Hastings Center Report 16 (3): 2224.Google Scholar
  43. Stalder, G.: 1981, Ethical committees in a pediatric hospital. European Journal of Pediatrics 136: 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sweeney, R.H.: 1987, Past, present, and future of hospital ethics committees. Delaware Medical Journal 59 (3): 181–184.Google Scholar
  45. Thornton, J.G. and Lilford, RJ.: 1995, Clinical ethics committee. British Medical Journal 311 (7006): 667–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tong, R.: 1986, Ethics in policy analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  47. Toulmin, S.: 1988, Medical ethics in its American context: An historical survey. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 530: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Uhlmann, R.F., et al: 1987, Letter to the editor. Annals of Internal Medicine107(4): 602.Google Scholar
  49. Veatch, R.M.: 1984, The ethics of institutional ethics committees. In: Cranford, R. and Doudera, A.E., Institutional ethics committees and health care decision making. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  50. Waterston, T. and Sanders, D.: 1984, The right to die tangles between medicine and the law. Round the World sect., The Lancet, February 18: 387–388.Google Scholar
  51. Yeo, M.: 1989, Primum non nocere: The ethics of teaching medical ethics. Teaching Philosophy 12 (1): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Young, M.: 1986, Hospital ethics committees. Texas Medicine 82: 72–74.Google Scholar
  53. Youngner, SJ., Jackson, D.L., Coulton, D.L,., et al.: 1983, Survey in president’s commission for the study of ethical problems in medicine and biomedical and behavioral research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Appendix F, p. 443–457.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher D. Melley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations