Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 8))

  • 415 Accesses

Abstract

Let us admit right at the start that this is by no means an easy question to answer. However, the reason for this is not that no straightforward answer can be given. I think a perfectly straightforward answer certainly can be given, and I will say in a moment what I think the answer is. No, the reason the question is not an easy one is that the straightforward answer is not likely to be what is wanted by anyone who actually asked the question. And the reason for this is that it is unlikely that the question itself is ever asked in a straightforward sense. If someone asks me (as happened the other week), “What is a camellia?”, there seems no reason why the question should not be a straightforward request for information. That is why the simple and straightforward answer, “It is a flowering shrub related to the tea bush”, is just the sort of answer I can expect to satisfy whoever asks. It is perfectly reasonable for someone who happens not to be particularly interested in gardening not to know what a camellia is. Then it becomes perfectly reasonable for them to ask what a camellia is in the simple spirit of asking for information. But it is hard to think that the question, “What is a person?”, could be asked in this spirit. You could ask for information in this sense only if you did not know what a person was. There could be few competent language-users who really did not know what a person was. The question “What is a person?” is, I would confidently say, almost certainly never a request for information. But then if it is not such a request, what sort of question is it? It is certainly an unusual, even odd, question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Capron, A.M.: 1987, Anencephalic donors: separate the dead from the dying. Hastings Center Report 17 (1): 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P.: 1989, Introducing Persons. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, J.F.: 1993, The personhood of the human embryo. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (4): 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H.T.: 1982, Concepts of personhood, in: Beauchamp, T. and Walters, L. (eds.), Contemporary issues in bioethics. Wadsworth, Belmont, p. 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P.: 1986, Life and death. London Review of Books, 7th August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, J.: 1977, The French lieutenant’s woman. Triad, Granada/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, K.G.: 1986, Redefining death. Yale University Press, New Haven and London. Gillon, R.: 1990, Death (editorial). Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1): 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J.: 1977, Causing death and saving lives. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.: 1985, The value of life. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords: 1993, Airedale ZNHS Trust v. Bland. House of Lords 1 all ER 821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhse, H. and Singer, P.: 1985, Should the baby live? The problem of handicapped infants. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, D.: 1988. Death, brain death and ethics. Croom Helm Ltd., Beckenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizza, J.: 1993, Persons and death. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (4): 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M.: 1985, When does life begin. In: Lockwood, M. (ed.), Moral dilemmas in modern medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P.: 1993, Brain dead brain absent brain donors. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. WHAT IS A PERSON 155

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruyter, Z.W.: 1996, Embryos as moral subjects and limits of responsibility. In: Evans, D. (ed.) Conceiving the embryo. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, M.: 1983 Abortion and infanticide. Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, M. (2001). What is a Person. In: ten Have, H., Gordijn, B. (eds) Bioethics in a European Perspective. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9706-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9706-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5872-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9706-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics