Advertisement

Genetic Interventions and Personal Identity

  • Ruth F. Chadwick
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 8)

Abstract

A defining feature of gene therapy, in contrast to conventional medical treatment, is that it is explicitly designed to bring about changes at the genetic level, by, for example, introducing a functioning gene into a human being who lacks one. Questions arise as to whether the alteration of an individual’s genetic make-up could bring about a change in who that person is, i.e. an identity change, and if so whether this is something about which there are grounds for concern from a moral point of view. In order to answer these questions it is necessary to examine what the connection is, if any, between genes and the person, and how that might be affected by gene therapy.

Keywords

Gene Therapy Personal Identity Cochlear Implant Moral Identity Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chadwick, R.: 1998, Gene therapy. In: Singer, P. and Kuhse, H. (eds.), A companion to bioethics. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Chadwick, R., Levitt, M.A. and Shickle, D. (eds.): 1997, The right to know and the right not to know. Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  3. Clothier, C.: 1992, Report of the committee on the ethics of gene therapy. HMSO, London. Elliott, R.: 1993, Identity and the ethics of gene therapy. Bioethics 7: 27–40.Google Scholar
  4. Gilbert, W.: 1992, A vision of the grail. In: Kevles, DJ. and Hood, L. (eds.), The code of codes: Scientific and social issues in the human genre project. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.)Google Scholar
  5. Grundfast, K. and Rosen, J: 1992, Ethical and cultural considerations in research on hereditary deafness. Molecular Biology and Genetics 25 (5): 973.Google Scholar
  6. MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After virtue. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  7. Miller, H. III: 1998, DNA blueprints, personhood, and genetic privacy. Health Matrix 8(2): 179–221.Google Scholar
  8. Nelkin, D. and Lindee, M.S.: 1995, The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. W.H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Pottage, A.: 1998, The inscription of life in law: genes, patents and bio-politics. Modem Law Review 61 (5): 740–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schneider, H. and Coutelle, C.: 1999, In utero gene therapy. Nature Medicine 5(3): 256–7. Stacey, J.: 1997, Teratologies: a cultural study of cancer. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  11. Strathern, M.: 1992, Reproducing the future: Essays on anthropology, kinship and the new reproductive technologies. Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  12. Williams, B.: 1990, Who might I have been? In: Chadwick, D.,. (eds.), Human genetic information: Science, law and ethics. Wiley, Chichester, p. 167–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth F. Chadwick

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations