Skip to main content

Humanities Higher Education: New Models, New Challenges

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that challenges from outside the university system have run concurrent with challenges from within — about the nature of knowledge, the discipline as a structurer of that knowledge and about the purpose of higher education — by philosophers of education and philosophers of language. It argues that a new model is needed: one that comes from the domain of the Humanities and is based on humanities’ distinct pedagogy. It suggests, moreover, that the construction of such a new model, if based on a clear and appropriate understanding of the relationship of knowledge to skill acquisition in the humanities, can provide a much-needed rationale for Higher Education as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnett, R. (1994). The Limits of Competence: Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. Buckingham and Bristol PA: SRHE/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1971). Intellectual field and creative project. In M.F.D. Young. (Ed.). Knowledge and ControlLondon: Collier and Macmillan. Con

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. and R. Schleifer. (1991). Criticism and Culture. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophic Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W.G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. (1966). Ethics and Education. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyani, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1970). The Myth of the Framework. In I. Lakatos and P. Musgrave. (Eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, J. (2001). Humanities Higher Education: New Models, New Challenges. In: Chambers, E.A. (eds) Contemporary Themes in Humanities Higher Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9678-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9678-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5608-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9678-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics