Advertisement

Representation in Psychophysics

  • Riccardo Luccio
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 295)

Abstract

To speak about representation in psychology with reference to psychophysics might appear somewhat paradoxical. If by ‘representation’ is meant (in a broad sense) a mental construct in the absence of (or at least independent from) actual sensory stimulation, then psychophysics is paradigmatically the exact contrary of the psychology of representation. In a certain sense, psychophysics is the branch of psychology which studies the relation between stimulation and sensation, and does so relatively regardless of mental contents. I believe that this image is only partly true, or least it is only adequate. In order to gain thorough understanding of the historical evolution of the concept of representation in psychology, careful examination of some aspects of psychophysics is recommended.

Keywords

Sensory Modality Differential Threshold Comparative Judgement Monthly Notice Mental Construct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albertazzi, L.: 1996, The Philosophy of Alexius Meinong, special issue of Axiomathes,, 7. Google Scholar
  2. Arnheim, R.: 1980, ‘The other Gustav Theodor Fechner,’ Gestalt Theory, 2, 133–140.Google Scholar
  3. Beretta, A.: 1969, TDS. Florence, OS.Google Scholar
  4. Bergson, H.: 1889, Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. Paris, Alcan.Google Scholar
  5. Bernoulli, D.: 1733, ‘Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis,’ Commentarium Academiae Scientiarum Petropolitanae, 5, 175–192.Google Scholar
  6. Bessel, F.W.: 1822, ‘Persönliche Gleichung bei Durchgangsbeobachtung,’ Astronomische Beobachtungen der Sternwarte zu Königsberg, 8, 39–72.Google Scholar
  7. Bouguer, P.: 1760, Traité d’optique sur la gradation de la lumière. Paris, Val.Google Scholar
  8. Brozek, J. and Gundlach, H. eds.: 1988, G.T. Fechner and Psychology. Passau, Passavia Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  9. Buttman, G.: 1973, The Shadow of the Telescope. New York, Scribner.Google Scholar
  10. Carterette, E.C. and Friedman, M. eds.: 1974, Handbook of Perception. Vol. 1. Roots of Perception. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, L.H. ed.: 1954, Consumer Behaviour. New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Conti, C.: 1975, Probabilità e valore nelle scienze sociali. Milan, Mazzotta.Google Scholar
  13. Dawes, W.R.: 1851, ‘On a Photometrical Method of Determining the Magnitudes of Telescopic Stars,’ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomic Society, 11, 187–198.Google Scholar
  14. Delboeuf, J.: 1872, Examen critique de la loi psychophysique: sa base et sa signification. Paris, Alcan.Google Scholar
  15. Delezenne, C.E.J.: 1827, ‘Sur les valeurs numériques des notes de la gamma,’ Recueil des travaux de la Societé des Sciences, de l’Agriculture et des Arts de Lille, 58, 1–56.Google Scholar
  16. Donders, F.C.: 1868/69, ‘Over de snelheid van psychische processen,’ Onderzoekingen gedaan in het Physiologisch Laboratorium der Utrechtsche Hoogeschool, 2, 92–120.Google Scholar
  17. Fechner, G.T.: 1824, Stapelia Mixta. Leipzig, Voss.Google Scholar
  18. Fechner, G.T.: 1838, ‘Über die subjektiven Complementarfarben,’ Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 44, 221–245, 513–535.Google Scholar
  19. Fechner, G.T.: 1840, ‘Über die subjektiven Nachbilder und Nebenbilder,’ Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 44, 193–221, 427–470.Google Scholar
  20. Fechner, G.T.: 1851, Zend-Avesta oder über die Dinge des Himmels und des Jenseit. Leipzig, Voss.Google Scholar
  21. Fechner, G.T.: 1860, Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
  22. Fechner, G.T.: 1875, Kleine Schriften. Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
  23. Gomes Penna, A.: 1988, ‘Bergson’s Critique of Fechner’s Psychophysics,’ in Brozek and Gundlach, eds., 1988, 151–155.Google Scholar
  24. Green, D.M. and Sweets, J.A.: 1966, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Gundlach, H.: 1988a, Index Psychophysicus. Passau, Passavia Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  26. Gundlach, H.: 1988b, ‘Fechner Scholarship — Aspects of its History,’ in Brozek and Gundlach, eds., 1988, 17–30.Google Scholar
  27. Helson, M.: 1964, Adaptation Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach in Behaviour. New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  28. Krueger, L.E.: 1989, ‘Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Towards a Unified Psychophysical Law,’ Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 251–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Legrenzi, P. and Luccio, R.: 1993, Immagini della psicologia. Bologna, il Mulino.Google Scholar
  30. Luccio, R.: 1993, ‘Il tempo della mente: Frans Cornelis Donders,’ in Legrenzi and Luccio, 1993, Immagini della psicologia. Bologna, il Mulino, 43–79.Google Scholar
  31. Luccio, R.: 1996, Tecniche di ricerca e analisi dei dati in psicologia. Bologna, il Mulino.Google Scholar
  32. Luce, R.D. 1959, Individual Choice Theory. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Meinong, A.: 1896, ‘Über die Bedeutung des Weber’schen Gesetzes. Beiträge zur Psychologie des Vergleichens und Messens,’ Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie des Sinnesorgane, 11, Sonder-Abdruck.Google Scholar
  34. Metzger, W.: 1974, ‘Consciousness, Perception and Action,’ in Carterette and Friedman, eds., 1974, 109–122.Google Scholar
  35. Plateau, J.: 1872, ‘Sur la mesure des sensations physiques et sur la loi qui lie l’intensité de ces sensations à l’intensité de la cause excitante,’ Bulletin de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 33, 376–385.Google Scholar
  36. Pliskoff, S.S.: 1977, ‘Antecedents to Fechner’s Law: The Astronomers J. Herschel, W.R. Dawes and N.R. Pogson,’ Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 28, 185–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pogson, N.R.: 1856, ‘Magnitude of Thirty-six of the Minor Planets for the First day of Each Month of the Year 1857,’ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomic Society, 17, 12–15.Google Scholar
  38. Potrc, M. and Vospernik, M.: 1996, ‘Meinong on Psychophysical Measurement,’ in Albertazzi, ed., 1996, 187–202.Google Scholar
  39. Purghé, F.: 1996, Metodi psicofisici e scaling multidimensionale. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  40. Romano, D.: 1990, Paradigmi. Milan, Cortina.Google Scholar
  41. Stevens, S.S.: 1951, ‘Mathematics, Measurement, and Psychophysics,’ in Stevens, ed., 1951, 1–49.Google Scholar
  42. Stevens, S.S. ed.: 1951, Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Stevens, S.S.: 1970, ‘Neural Events and the Psychophysical Law,’ Science, 170, 1043–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thurstone, L.L.: 1927, ‘A Law of Comparative Judgement,’ Psychological review, 34, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Torgerson, W.S.: 1954, ‘A Law of Categorical Judgement,’ in Clark, ed., 1954, 92–93.Google Scholar
  46. Turner, R.S.: 1988, ‘Fechner, Helmholtz and Hering on the Interpretation of Simultaneous Contrast,’ in Brozek and Gundlach, eds., 1988, 137–150.Google Scholar
  47. Weber, E.H.: 1834, De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Leipzig, Köhler. En. tr. 1978 De Tactu. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riccardo Luccio
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di PsicologiaUniversità di FirenzeFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations