Advertisement

G.F. Stout’s Philosophical Psychology

  • Elizabeth R. Valentine
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 295)

Abstract

My aim in this chapter will be to present some of the chief doctrines of George Frederick Stout’s philosophical psychology, particularly those which may have a bearing on current issues in cognitive science. As the main purpose is one of exposition, I shall rely heavily on quotations from his writings. Stout was an armchair psychologist: experimental psychology was for him a source of information rather than a substitute for thinking. It is peculiarly difficult to give an account of his philosophy for several reasons. The various strands are all closely interwoven. For example, embedded in his concept of noetic synthesis are criticisms of association, the doctrine of unity, and the role of thought in sensation. His philosophy is a synthesis. Mace reports that he once gleefully remarked: “I have got them all in my system.”1 Stout favours the via media; thus each statement must be qualified, easily leading to apparent paradox. In my view, these are more serious sources of difficulty than his terminology, though this can be confusing. On the one hand, he expresses new ideas in old-fashioned ways (“He hid his twentieth century light under a nineteenth century bushel”).2 More commonly, he expresses the same ideas in different ways.

Keywords

Physical Object Analytic Psychology Individual Consciousness Representative Theory Mere Appearance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyle, D.G.: 1993, Psychology — the Aberdeen Connection. Aberdeen, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  2. Broad, C.D.: 1945, ‘Professor G.F. Stout (1860–1944),’ Mind, 54, 285–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapman, A., Sheehy, N. and Conroy, W. eds.: 1997, Biographical Dictionary of Psychology. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Flugel, J.C.: 1933, A Hundred Years of Psychology. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
  5. Knight, R.: 1946, ‘George Frederick Stout: An Appreciation,’ British Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mace, C.A.: 1945, ‘George Frederick Stout 1860–1944,’ Proceedings of the British Academy, 31, 306–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mace, C.A.: 1954, ‘The permanent contribution to psychology of George Frederick Stout,’ British Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Passmore, J.A.: 1952, ‘Memoir: George Frederick Stout,’ in Stout 1952, xxv–xxiv.Google Scholar
  9. Pylkkänen, P. and Pylkkö, P., eds.: 1995, New Directions in Cognitive Science. Helsinki, Finnish Artificial Intelligence Society.Google Scholar
  10. Pylyshyn, Z.W.: 1984, Computation and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Schaar, M. van der: 1996, ‘From Analytic Psychology to Analytic Philosophy: the Reception of Twardowski’s Ideas in Cambridge,’ Axiomathes, 7, 294–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stout, G.F.: 1896, Analytic Psychology. Vols. I and II. London, George Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stout, G.F.: 1898, Manual of Psychology. London, University Tutorial Press. 1938, 5th edition.Google Scholar
  14. Stout, G.F.: 1930, Studies in Philosophy and Psychology. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Stout, G.F.: 1931, Mind & Matter. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Stout, G.F.: 1940, ‘The Philosophy of Samuel Alexander (I),’ Mind, 49, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stout, G.F.: (Unpubl.) ‘How Psychology is Concerned with Objects.’ Unpublished draft of part of Chapter I for the fifth edition of the Manual of Psychology, cited in Mace, 1954.Google Scholar
  18. Stout, G.F.: 1952, God and Nature, ed. by A.K. Stout. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Valentine, E.R.: 1995, ‘Deconstructing Cognition: Towards a Framework for Exploring Non- conceptualised Experience,’ in Pylkkänen and Pylkkö, eds., 1995, 1–9.Google Scholar
  20. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E.: 1991, The Embodied Mind. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wetherick, N.E.: 1997, ‘George Frederick Stout,’ in Chapman, Sheehy and Conroy, eds., 1997, 547.Google Scholar
  22. Wright, J.N.: 1944, ‘Obituary: Prof. G.F. Stout,’ Nature, No. 3911, October 14th, 481.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth R. Valentine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRoyal Holloway, University of LondonEgham, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations