Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 21))

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

The first part of the chapter gives an overview of the extent of the problem of deforestation; the last two parts indicate which measures may contribute to a reduction of deforestation. In our search for model solutions to the deforestation problem we first summarise the causes of deforestation, special attention being paid to the situation in Brazil and Costa Rica, the two countries where Precious Woods operates. Secondly, the consequences of forest destruction are discussed, with a summary of estimates of the economic costs of deforestation. These figures also in fact give an indication of how the rate of deforestation could be reduced. If forest products can be produced on a sustainable basis and sold at a competitive price, perhaps, together with other services of the forest, the incentives to protect and conserve the forest may increase. Within this section, the emphasis is put on timber. Furthermore, carbon storage is stressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Being aware that estimates of deforestation vary greatly and that a number of studies on the topic exist, we refer here mainly to FAO figures. This narrow source of data is justified by the purpose of this chapter: we simply want to demonstrate the approximate scale and rough trends of deforestation and do not attempt to draw an absolutely accurate picture of the current situation.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deforestation in FAO sources is generally defined as change in vegetation which reduces the crown cover to 10% or less (see also Amelung and Diehl, 1992: 116).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Interviews with José Miguel Brenes, general manager of Precious Woods Costa Rica, March 1998 and interview with Luis Ugalde (CATIE, Costa Rica ), March 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Interview with José Miguel Brenes (Precious Woods Costa Rica), Luis Ugalde (CATIE, Costa Rica) and author’s impression during fieldwork in Costa Rica.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The NPV is calculated as (1/r)a, where r is the interest rate and a the perpetual annual income stream derived from sustainable resource use.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See for example Schneider (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sustainability here refers to the timber yields and does not necessarily qualify for more stringent criteria of sustainability. See discussion in chapter below.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pearce and Moran refer to a study of Peters, Gentry and Mendelsohn (1989) which has, however, frequently been criticised, because the study does not appreciate the problem of limited demand for non-wood forest products.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Also, any assessment of the economic viability of forestry projects to be financed via timber sales (as envisaged by Precious Woods) hinges on the future export price for tropical timber.

    Google Scholar 

  10. In this context see also Janssen and Mohr (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider, for example, deduces a carbon storage price of 4,950 $/ha on the assumption that tax rates are equivalent to the net costs of CO2 emission reductions (Schneider 1995: 57). Pearce, in contrast, estimates the damage per ha deforested rain forest to be $ 1300 in terms of carbon release (Pearce 1990:256); he takes this value to be a conservative estimate.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nevertheless, people might not pay for existence values, but feel that they pay for option values (as they might wish to use the forest resources some time in the future) or they might see their contribution even as paying for use values as they benefit from the international environmental services of the rain forest (carbon storage). In order to understand which values people are really paying for, one would need to analyse the motivation of organisations (and their sponsors) engaging in debt for nature swaps.

    Google Scholar 

  13. This value appears not to take carbon storage into account, which alone, according to Pearce, constitutes a minimum value of $ 1300/ha ( Pearce 1990 ). Another explanation for the low value could be that it refers not to NPV but to annual benefits.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kägi, W. (2000). Deforestation: Extent, Causes and Consequences. In: Economics of Climate Change: The Contribution of Forestry Projects. Environment & Policy, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9600-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9600-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5372-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9600-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics