Skip to main content

Tourism and Recreation Surveys: The Problems of Sample Selection and Truncation Bias

  • Chapter
Book cover Tourism and the Environment

Part of the book series: Environment & Assessment ((ENAS,volume 6))

  • 393 Accesses

Abstract

The analysis of tourism, and subsequent policy recommendations, are often heavily dependent upon the reliability of sample surveys. Whilst considerable attention is devoted to obtaining a reasonable sample size — so that statistically significance of sample means can be assessed — and to minimising other errors common to both complete counts and surveys1, relatively little recognition is given to the problems of sample selection and truncation bias in tourism and recreation surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balkan, E. and J.R. Kahn, (1988) The value of changes in deer hunting quality: a travel-cost approach. Applied Economics 20, 533–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, F.W. and V.R. Leeworthy (1990) Recreation demand by tourists for saltwater beach days. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18, 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael, N.E., W.M. Hanemann and I.E. Strand (1984) Measuring the Benefits of WaterQuality Improvement Using Recreation Demand Models. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Report CR–811043–01–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Waterways (1989) Report and Accounts of the British Waterways Board 1988/89. Watford: British Waterways.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W.E. (1950) Some Theory of Sampling. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Transport (1987) Values of Journey Time Savings and Accident Prevention. Department of Transport, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, G.D. and K.G. Willis (1990) Contingent Valuation Techniques: A Review of Their Unbiasedness, Efficiency and Consistency. Countryside Change Working Paper Series. WP10. Countryside Change Unit, Department of Agricultural Economics and Food Marketing, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (1979) A Guide to Econometrics. Martin Robertson, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.S. (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maille, P. and R. Mendelsohn (1993) Valuing ecotourism in Madagascar. Journal of Environmental Management 38, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, E.R., W.D. Shaw and R.D. Rowe (1991) A discrete choice model of recreational participation, site choice, and activity valuation when complete trip data are not available. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20, 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.K. and Desvousges, W.H. (1985) The generalised travel-cost model and water quality benefits. Southern Economic Journal 52, 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.K. (1988) Selection and recreation demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, D. and R. Mendelsohn (1991) Valuing ecotourism a tropical rain-forest reserve. Ambio 20, 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K.G. and J.F. Benson (1989) Values of User Benefits of Forest Recreation: some further site surveys. Report to the Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K.G. and G.D. Garrod (1990) The individual travel-cost method and the value of recreation: the case of the Montgomery and Lancaster Canals. Environment and Planning C, Government and Policy 8, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K.G. and G.D. Garrod (1991a) An individual travel-cost method of evaluating forest recreation. Journal of Agricultural Economics 42, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K.G. (1991). The recreational value of the Forestry Commission Estate in Great Britain: a Clawson-Knetsch travel cost analysis. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 38, 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K.G. and G.D. Garrod (1991b) Valuing open access recreation on inland waterways: on-site recreation surveys and selection effects. Regional Studies 25: 6, 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Willis, K.G., Garrod, G.D. (2000). Tourism and Recreation Surveys: The Problems of Sample Selection and Truncation Bias. In: Briassoulis, H., van der Straaten, J. (eds) Tourism and the Environment. Environment & Assessment, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9584-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9584-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5385-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9584-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics