A Description of University-Industry R&D Collaboartion in the United Kingdom

Part of the Library of Public Policy and Public Administration book series (LPPP, volume 1)


For the United Kingdom, the growth in institutional management of university-industry collaboration has been almost as marked as the increase in volume. While much work still takes place on an informal level, without the need for financial exchanges or contractual terms, the increased involvement of institutions has allowed, for the first time, an accurate mechanism by which the extent of collaboration can be quantified.


Intellectual Property Academic Partner Salary Cost Teaching Company Collaborative Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Association for University Research and Industry Links/Confederation of British Industry. Research Partnerships Between Industry and Universities-A Guide to Better Practice. London: CBI Publications, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, H., Bond, R. and Mullins, P. An Anatomy of Research Personnel in UK Universities. Swindon, Science and Engineering Research Council, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Betz, F. Industry/University Centers for Connecting Industry to Science. Istanbul: Proceedings of the UNIC International Conference on Technology Management, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principles. The Costing of Research Projects in Universities: A Report and Guidance to Universities. London: CVCP, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. Department of Trade and Industry. Competitiveness: Helping Small Firms. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Department of Trade and Industry. Consultation on the Next Round of the Foresight Programme. London: DTI, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Trade and Industry. Survey of Industry-University Links 1995 and 1996. London: Innovation Unit, DTI, 1996 & 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Grorghiou, L. Cameron H., Stein J. A, Nedeva M., Janes M., Yates J., Pifer M., Boden M., and Senker J. The Impact of European Community Policies for Research and Technological Development upon Science and Technology in the United Kingdom. Report prepared for the Office of Science and Technology and European Commission. London: HMSO, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. Gourlay A R., Hargreaves K. E., McCracken, Seaton J. S., and Weyman-Jones T. The Management of Intellectual Property in UK Universities: A Compendium of Results. Department of Economics Research Paper No 97/28. University of Loughborough, November 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Hicks D., and Katz S. The Changing Shape of British Industrial Research. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex: SPRU, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. Higher Education Statistics Agency. Resources of Higher Education Institutions, 1996– 97 (and previous volumes for 1994– 95, 1995– 96). Cheltenham: HESA, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. H M Treasury, Department of Trade and Industry. Innovating for the Future: Investing in R&D. London: DTI, March 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Howells J., Nedeva M., and Georghiou L. Industry-Academic Links in the UK. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England, December 1998.Google Scholar
  14. Office of Science and Technology. Intellectual Property and the Public Sector Science Base. London: HMSO, 1992.Google Scholar
  15. Office of Science and Technology. Progress Through Partnership. London: Report of the Steering Group of the Technology Foresight Initiative, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. Office of Science and Technology. Foresight LINK Newsletter. London: DTI, April 1998.Google Scholar
  17. Office of Science and Technology. Realizing Our Potential. London: HMSO, 1993.Google Scholar
  18. Office of Science and Technology. Report on the Whitehall Audit of the Foresight Program. London: OST, October 1997.Google Scholar
  19. Office of Science and Technology. Winning Through Foresight: Key Issues. London: OST, 1998.Google Scholar
  20. Petrick, I. R., and Reischman, M. M. “Strategic Development of Engineering Policies for Patenting and Licensing,” Journal of the Society of Research Administrators. Vol XXVII, 1996.Google Scholar
  21. Perel, M. Discontinuities and Challenges in the Management of Technology. Research and Technology Management, July-August 1990.Google Scholar
  22. Pickering, J. F., Matthews, D., Wilson, C., and Kirkland, J. “The University: Industry Interface in the Generation of Intellectual Property,” Higher Education Quarterly. Vol. 53, No. 1, January 1999.Google Scholar
  23. Robson, E. H. “Linking Small Firms with Higher Education,” Industry & Higher Education. Vol. 12, No. 2, April 1996f.Google Scholar
  24. Senker, J., Senker, P., and Hall, A. Teaching Company Performance and Features of Successful Programmes. University of Sussex: Science Policy Research Unit, June 1993.Google Scholar
  25. Teaching Company Scheme. 1997– 98 Annual Report. Teaching Company Directorate, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. Universities Statistical Record. University Statistics: Volume 3, Finance. Published annually until 1994. Cheltenham: USR.Google Scholar
  27. Weyman-Jones, Gourmet, T., and Massey, S. Comparative Study of Systems for Intellectual Property Management in HEI’s in the UK, US and Germany. Final Report on ESRC Projects. L325253022. Loughborough University: Department of Economics, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.National Institute of Economic and Social ResearchLondonUK
  3. 3.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations