Abstract
Finding ways to channel knowledge, know-how, and technology from universities to industry for the benefit of the nation became an important public policy issue for the U.S. beginning in the late 1970s, the beginning of the era of global competition. Concern over declining rates of economic growth and reduced competitiveness of U.S. industry resulted in a policy approach that emphasized improving the linkages between U.S. firms and research universities. The policy goal was to improve the condition of firms, especially in innovation-intense industries, by using university research results and personnel to bring to the market new or improved products, processes, and services. Reacting to financial pressures, universities were receptive to the incentives included in the legislation and adopted a mission of research partnership with industry. Responding first to their declining competitiveness and later to the organizational stress created by corporate restructuring, the private sector also engaged in concerted efforts to link to universities.
This chapter and the next were written by Dianne Rahm and draw heavily on data collected during a two-phase research project conducted during 1993 and 1994 funded by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation. In phase I, a study population consisting of slightly less than 2,000 administrators or researchers within the top 100 U.S. research universities was surveyed. Two specially tailored surveys were developed. One emphasized researcher concerns and was sent to research professors affiliated with university centers or with departments of Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, and Physics. The other stressed university administrative issues and was sent to academic officials within each university. Of those, 1,114 completed surveys were returned yielding an overall response rate of 57%. Responses included 996 researcher surveys and 118 administrative surveys giving response rates of 56% and 63%, respectively. In phase two, site visits to 5 selected universities and firms which partner with them were made. Site visits were completed at The Pennsylvania State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Stanford University, and Washington University. Seventy personal interviews were conducted with university and industry personnel. The author is grateful for the support of the National Science Foundation received under grant # SBR-9305591.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Technology Pre-Eminence Act of 1991, PL102– 245, enacted Jan 29, 1992.
AUTM. AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 1996. Norwalk, CT: Association of University Technology Managers, 1998.
Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, PL 96– 517, enacted December 12, 1980.
Bean, Alden S., M. Jean Russo and Roger L. Whiteley. “Benchmarking Your R&D: Results from IRI/CIMS Annual R&D Survey for FY’96,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 41, No.1, January 1998, 21– 30.
Bowie, Norman. University-Business Partnerships: An Assessment. Maryland and London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.
Bozeman, Barry, Michael Crow, and Albert N. Link. Strategic Management of Industrial R&D. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1984.
Cohen, Wesley, Richard Florida, and W. Richard Goe. University-Industry Research Centers in the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 1994.
Cooke, Ian and Paul Mayes. Introduction to Innovation and Technology Transfer. Boston and London: Artech House, Inc., 1996.
Congressional Budget Office. J932– 18. “Using Federal R&D to Promote Commercial Innovation.” 1988.
Dodgson, Mark and Roy Rothwell. “Technology Strategies in Small and Medium-Sized Firms.” Edited by Mark Dodgson. Technology Strategy and the Firm: Management and Public Policy. London: Longman, 1989.
Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, PL 99– 502, enacted October 20, 1986.
Feller, Irwin. “What Agricultural Extension Has to Offer as a Model for Manufacturing Modernization,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Vol. 12, 1993, 574– 578.
Florida, Richard and Martin Kenney. The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America’s Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production. New York: Basic Books, 1990.
Fusfeld, Herbert. “Corporate Restructuring-What Impact on U.S. Industrial Research?” Research Management. Vol. 30, No. 4, 1987, 10– 17.
Gannes, Stuart. “The Good News About U.S. R&D,” Fortune. Vol. 117, No. 3, 1988, 48– 56.
Geiger, Roger. To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities 1900– 1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Glassie, Jefferson C. “Heading Off Antitrust With Smart Research,” Association Management. No. 39, No. 4, 1987,61– 63.
Hadwiger, Don F. The Politics of Agricultural Research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1982.
Jankowski, John E. “R&D: Foundation for Innovation,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 41, No. 2, March 1998, 14– 20.
Knoblauch, H., Law, E., and Meyer, W. State Agricultural Experiment Stations: A History of Research Policy and Procedure, Cooperative State Experiment Station Service. USDA, 1962.
Krieger, James H. “Cooperation Key to U.S. Technology Remaining Competitive,” Chemical Engineering News. Vol. 65, No. 17, 1987, 24– 26.
Lesko, John, Phillip Nicolai, and Michael Steve. Technology Exchange in the Information Age: A Guide to Successful R&D Partnerships. Columbus: Battel le Press, 1998.
Link, Albert N. and Gregory Tassey. Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry, University, Government Relationship. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
Mansfield, Edwin. “Academic Research and Industrial Innovation,” Research Policy. Vol. 20, 1991, 1– 12.
Matkin, Gary W. Technology Transfer and The University. New York, Oxford, Singapore, and Sydney: Maxwell Macmillan International, 1990.
Murray, Thomas J. “R&D Tax Shelters are Catching On,” Dun’s Business Month. Vol. 118, No. 6, 1981, 86–87.
National Cooperative Research Act of 1984, PL 98– 462, enacted October 11, 1984.
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, PL 104– 113, enacted February 1996.
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, PL 100– 418, enacted August 23, 1988.
Prestowitz, Clyde V. Trading Places: How We Are Giving Our Future to Japan and How to Reclaim It. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
Rahm, Dianne. “Academic Perceptions of University-Firm Technology Transfer,” Policy Studies Journal. Summer 1994, 267– 278.
Rahm, Dianne. “Business Expectations and University Interactions: A Suggested Typology from a Survey of U.S. Firms,” Industry and Higher Education. Vol. 10, No. 4, August 1996, 207– 218.
Rahm, Dianne and Thomas Luce, Jr. “Issues in the Design of State Science and Technology-Based Economic Development Programs: The Case of Pennsylvania’s Ben Franklin Partnership,” Economic Development Quarterly. Vol. 6, No. 1, February 1992, 41– 51.
Rea, Donald G., Harvey Brooks, Robert M. Burger, and Richard LaScala. “The Semiconductor Industry: Model for Industry/University/Government Cooperation,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 40, No. 4, July 1997, 46– 54.
Reams, Bernard D., Jr. University-Industry Research Partnerships: The Major Legal Issues in Research and Development Agreements. Westport: Quorum Books, 1986.
Rosssner, David, Catherine P. Ailes, Irwin Feller, and Linda Parker. “How Industry Benefits from NSF’s Engineering Research Centers,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 41, No. 5, September 1998, 40– 44.
Schultze, Charles L. Memos to the President: A Guide Through Macroeconomics for the Busy Policymaker. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1992.
Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, PL 96– 480, enacted October 21, 1980.
Technology Competitiveness Act. See House Report 100– 266 (August 4, 1987) and Senate Report 100– 80 (June 22, 1987) and Title V, Subtitle B of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, PL 100– 418, enacted August 23, 1988.
Trademark Clarification Act of 1984, PL 98– 620, enacted November 8, 1984.
Whiteley, Roger L., Alden S. Bean, and M. Jean Russo. “Meet Your Competition: Results from IRI/CIMS Annual R&D Survey for FY’95,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 40, No. 1, January 1997, 16– 23.
Zwart, Sara G. “The New Antitrust: An Aerial View of Joint Ventures and Mergers,” Journal of Business Strategy. Vol. 7, Spring 1987, 68– 76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahm, D., Kirkland, J., Bozeman, B. (2000). A Description of University-Industry R&D Collaboration in the United States. In: University-Industry R&D Collaboration in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9574-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9574-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5361-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9574-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive