Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Library of Public Policy and Public Administration ((LPPP,volume 1))

  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

Finding ways to channel knowledge, know-how, and technology from universities to industry for the benefit of the nation became an important public policy issue for the U.S. beginning in the late 1970s, the beginning of the era of global competition. Concern over declining rates of economic growth and reduced competitiveness of U.S. industry resulted in a policy approach that emphasized improving the linkages between U.S. firms and research universities. The policy goal was to improve the condition of firms, especially in innovation-intense industries, by using university research results and personnel to bring to the market new or improved products, processes, and services. Reacting to financial pressures, universities were receptive to the incentives included in the legislation and adopted a mission of research partnership with industry. Responding first to their declining competitiveness and later to the organizational stress created by corporate restructuring, the private sector also engaged in concerted efforts to link to universities.

This chapter and the next were written by Dianne Rahm and draw heavily on data collected during a two-phase research project conducted during 1993 and 1994 funded by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation. In phase I, a study population consisting of slightly less than 2,000 administrators or researchers within the top 100 U.S. research universities was surveyed. Two specially tailored surveys were developed. One emphasized researcher concerns and was sent to research professors affiliated with university centers or with departments of Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, and Physics. The other stressed university administrative issues and was sent to academic officials within each university. Of those, 1,114 completed surveys were returned yielding an overall response rate of 57%. Responses included 996 researcher surveys and 118 administrative surveys giving response rates of 56% and 63%, respectively. In phase two, site visits to 5 selected universities and firms which partner with them were made. Site visits were completed at The Pennsylvania State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Stanford University, and Washington University. Seventy personal interviews were conducted with university and industry personnel. The author is grateful for the support of the National Science Foundation received under grant # SBR-9305591.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Technology Pre-Eminence Act of 1991, PL102– 245, enacted Jan 29, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • AUTM. AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 1996. Norwalk, CT: Association of University Technology Managers, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, PL 96– 517, enacted December 12, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, Alden S., M. Jean Russo and Roger L. Whiteley. “Benchmarking Your R&D: Results from IRI/CIMS Annual R&D Survey for FY’96,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 41, No.1, January 1998, 21– 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, Norman. University-Business Partnerships: An Assessment. Maryland and London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, Barry, Michael Crow, and Albert N. Link. Strategic Management of Industrial R&D. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley, Richard Florida, and W. Richard Goe. University-Industry Research Centers in the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Ian and Paul Mayes. Introduction to Innovation and Technology Transfer. Boston and London: Artech House, Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office. J932– 18. “Using Federal R&D to Promote Commercial Innovation.” 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, Mark and Roy Rothwell. “Technology Strategies in Small and Medium-Sized Firms.” Edited by Mark Dodgson. Technology Strategy and the Firm: Management and Public Policy. London: Longman, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, PL 99– 502, enacted October 20, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, Irwin. “What Agricultural Extension Has to Offer as a Model for Manufacturing Modernization,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Vol. 12, 1993, 574– 578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard and Martin Kenney. The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America’s Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production. New York: Basic Books, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusfeld, Herbert. “Corporate Restructuring-What Impact on U.S. Industrial Research?” Research Management. Vol. 30, No. 4, 1987, 10– 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannes, Stuart. “The Good News About U.S. R&D,” Fortune. Vol. 117, No. 3, 1988, 48– 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, Roger. To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities 1900– 1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassie, Jefferson C. “Heading Off Antitrust With Smart Research,” Association Management. No. 39, No. 4, 1987,61– 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwiger, Don F. The Politics of Agricultural Research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, John E. “R&D: Foundation for Innovation,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 41, No. 2, March 1998, 14– 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch, H., Law, E., and Meyer, W. State Agricultural Experiment Stations: A History of Research Policy and Procedure, Cooperative State Experiment Station Service. USDA, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, James H. “Cooperation Key to U.S. Technology Remaining Competitive,” Chemical Engineering News. Vol. 65, No. 17, 1987, 24– 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesko, John, Phillip Nicolai, and Michael Steve. Technology Exchange in the Information Age: A Guide to Successful R&D Partnerships. Columbus: Battel le Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Albert N. and Gregory Tassey. Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry, University, Government Relationship. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin. “Academic Research and Industrial Innovation,” Research Policy. Vol. 20, 1991, 1– 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matkin, Gary W. Technology Transfer and The University. New York, Oxford, Singapore, and Sydney: Maxwell Macmillan International, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Thomas J. “R&D Tax Shelters are Catching On,” Dun’s Business Month. Vol. 118, No. 6, 1981, 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Cooperative Research Act of 1984, PL 98– 462, enacted October 11, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, PL 104– 113, enacted February 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, PL 100– 418, enacted August 23, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestowitz, Clyde V. Trading Places: How We Are Giving Our Future to Japan and How to Reclaim It. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, Dianne. “Academic Perceptions of University-Firm Technology Transfer,” Policy Studies Journal. Summer 1994, 267– 278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, Dianne. “Business Expectations and University Interactions: A Suggested Typology from a Survey of U.S. Firms,” Industry and Higher Education. Vol. 10, No. 4, August 1996, 207– 218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, Dianne and Thomas Luce, Jr. “Issues in the Design of State Science and Technology-Based Economic Development Programs: The Case of Pennsylvania’s Ben Franklin Partnership,” Economic Development Quarterly. Vol. 6, No. 1, February 1992, 41– 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea, Donald G., Harvey Brooks, Robert M. Burger, and Richard LaScala. “The Semiconductor Industry: Model for Industry/University/Government Cooperation,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 40, No. 4, July 1997, 46– 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reams, Bernard D., Jr. University-Industry Research Partnerships: The Major Legal Issues in Research and Development Agreements. Westport: Quorum Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosssner, David, Catherine P. Ailes, Irwin Feller, and Linda Parker. “How Industry Benefits from NSF’s Engineering Research Centers,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 41, No. 5, September 1998, 40– 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, Charles L. Memos to the President: A Guide Through Macroeconomics for the Busy Policymaker. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, PL 96– 480, enacted October 21, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technology Competitiveness Act. See House Report 100– 266 (August 4, 1987) and Senate Report 100– 80 (June 22, 1987) and Title V, Subtitle B of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, PL 100– 418, enacted August 23, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trademark Clarification Act of 1984, PL 98– 620, enacted November 8, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, Roger L., Alden S. Bean, and M. Jean Russo. “Meet Your Competition: Results from IRI/CIMS Annual R&D Survey for FY’95,” Research Technology Management. Vol. 40, No. 1, January 1997, 16– 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, Sara G. “The New Antitrust: An Aerial View of Joint Ventures and Mergers,” Journal of Business Strategy. Vol. 7, Spring 1987, 68– 76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rahm, D., Kirkland, J., Bozeman, B. (2000). A Description of University-Industry R&D Collaboration in the United States. In: University-Industry R&D Collaboration in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9574-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9574-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5361-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9574-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics