Abstract
In the present paper I would like to present some reflections which occurred to me upon reading Grosholz’s paper “The Partial Unification of Domains, Hybrids, and the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge.” However, I should warn the reader that although Grosholz’s paper provided the original stimulus for mine, in the end I pursue a number of issues which were perhaps not the central ones Grosholz was addressing. Grosholz begins by claiming that,
Relations among distinct areas of mathematical activity are most commonly discussed in terms of the reduction of axiomatized theories, where reduction is defined to be the deductive derivation of the axioms of the reduced theory as theorems of the reducing theory (Grosholz 1999, 81).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle. (1941). The Basic Works of Aristotle. Edited and Translated by R. McKeon. New York: Random House.
Arnauld, A. (1667). Nouveaux Elemens de Geometrie. Paris. Reprint in (Arnauld 1775–81, Vol. 42).
Arnauld, A. (1775–81). Oeuvres de Messire Antoine Arnauld. G. Du Pac de Bellegarde and J. Hautefage. (Eds.). Paris: S. D’Arnay.
Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P. (1872). The Port-Royal Logic. Translated by Thomas Spencer Baynes. 7th Edition. Edinburgh: Blackwood Publishing.
Barnes, J. (1975). Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biancani, G. (1615). De mathematicarum natura dissertatio, Bononiae. Translation in (Mancosu 1996, 178–212).
Bolzano, B. (1837). Wissenschaftslehre. Sulzbach: Seidel.
Bolzano, B. (1972). Theory of Science. Edited and Translated by R. George. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bolzano, B. (1978). Vermischte Philosophische und Physikalische Schriften. J. Berg. (Ed.). Part of Bernard-Bolzano Gesamtausgabe. (1969-), Winter, Kambartel, van Rootselaar. (Eds.). Stuttgart: Frömmann Verlag.
Fabri, H. (1669). Synopsis Geometrica. Lugduni Gallorum.
Gottignies, G. F. de. (1669). Elementa Geometriae Planae. Rome: Angeli Bernado.
Grosholz, E. (1985). “Two episodes in the unification of logic and topology.” British Journal for the Philosophy ofScience. Vol. 36: 147–57.
Grosholz, E. (1999). “The partial unification of domains, hybrids, and the growth of mathematical knowledge.” In this volume. Pages 81–91.
Guldin, P. (1635–1641). Centrobaryca. Viennae: Gelbhaar.
Kitcher, P. (1975). “Bolzano’s ideal of algebraic analysis.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 6: 229–69.
Mancosu, P. (1991). “On the Status of Proofs by Contradiction in the Seventeenth Century.” Synthèse. Vol. 88: 15–41.
Mancosu, P. (1992). “Aristotelian Logic and Euclidean Mathematics: Seventeenth-Century Developments of the Quaestio de Certitudine Mathematicarum.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 23: 241–65.
Mancosu, P. (1996). Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Menger, K. (1928). “Bemerkungen zur Grundlagenfragen.” Jahresbericht der Deutschen MathematikerVereinigung. Vol. 37: 213–26. Translated as “An intuitionistic-formalistic dictionary of settheory” in (Menger 1979, 79–87).
Menger, K. (1979). Selected Papers in Logic and Foundations, Didactics, Economics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Nehrlich, G. (1979). “What can geometry explain?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 30: 69–83.
Pereyra, B. (1576). De communibus omnium rerum naturalium principiis et affectionibus libri quindecim. Rome.
Philosophical Transactions. (1670). Vol. 5: 2054–7. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation and Klaus Reprint Corporation, New York, 1963.
Piccolomini, A. (1547). Commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum. Rome.
Proclus. (1970). A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Translated by Glenn R. Morrow. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Resnik, M., and Kushner, D. (1987). “Explanation, Independence and Realism in Mathematics.” British Journalfor the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 38: 141–58.
Rivaltus, D. (1615). Archimedis Opera quae extant novis demonstrationibus commentariisque illustrata per Davidem Rivaltum in Flurantia. Paris.
Salmon, W. (1990). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sandborg, D. (1996). Pick’s Theorem: A case study in mathematical explanation. Unpublished typescript.
Steiner, M. (1978). “Mathematical Explanation.” Philosophical Studies. Vol. 34: 135–51.
Steiner, M. (1983). “The Philosophy of Mathematics of Imre Lakatos.” The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 80: 502–21.
Steiner, M. (1999). “Penrose and Platonism.” In this volume. Pages 133–41.
Ulivi, E. (1982). “Il Teorema di Pappo-Guldino: Dimostrazioni ed Attribuzioni.”Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche. Vol. II : 179–208.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mancosu, P. (2000). On Mathematical Explanation. In: Grosholz, E., Breger, H. (eds) The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Synthese Library, vol 289. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5391-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9558-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive