Skip to main content

Mathematical Progress

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 289))

Abstract

‘What is progress in mathematics?’ The answer, at least a partial answer, seems easy: ‘I make mathematical progress when I solve a problem I wanted to solve or prove a theorem I wanted to prove.’ Now there’s surely something right about this, but the issue that brings us here isn’t my mathematical development or lack thereof; what we want to know is how mathematics as a discipline progresses. Does mathematics as a discipline progress when someone solves a problem she wanted to solve or proves a theorem she wanted to prove? Well, not if the problem had already been solved or the theorem had already been proved by someone else, at least as long as that previous solution or proof is well known to the mathematical community. But the shortcomings of the easy answer go deeper than this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bulloff, J. et al. (Eds.), Foundations of Mathematics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D. and Stewart, F. (1953). “Infinite games with perfect information.” Contributions to the Theory of Games. Annals of Mathematical Studies. Vol. 28: 254–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1938). “The consistency of the axiom of choice and of the generalized continuum hypothesis.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 24: 556–7. Reprinted in his (1990, 26–7).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1940). The Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Reprinted in his (1990, 33–101).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1947). “What is Cantor’s Continuum Problem?” 2nd ed. Reprinted in his (1990, 176–87).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1964). “What is Cantor’s Continuum Problem?” 2nd ed. Reprinted in his (1990, 254–70).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1990). Collected Works. Vol. II. S. Feffermann et al. (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guiness, I. (1970). “An unpublished paper by Georg Cantor.” Acta Mathematica. Vol. 124: 65–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallet, M. (1984). Cantorian Set Theory and Limitation of Size. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunen, K. (1970). “Some applications of iterated ultrapowers in set theory.” Annals of Mathematical Logic. Vol. 1: 179–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunen, K. (1971). “Elementary embeddings and infmitary combinatorics.” Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 36: 407–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunen, K. (1980). Set Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusin, N. (1917). “Sur la classification de M. Baire.” Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences. Vol. 164: 91–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, P. (1993). “Does V equal L?” Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 58: 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, P. (1997). Naturalism in Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. A. (1970). “Measurable cardinals and analytic games.” Fundamenta Mathematica. Vol. 66: 287 – 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. A. (1975). “Bore! determinacy.” Annals of Mathematics. Vol. 102: 363–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. A. (1980). “Infinite games.” Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Helsinki 1978. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. A. and Steel, J. (1988). “Projective determinacy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. Vol 85, 6582–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. A. and Steel, J. (1989). “A proof of projective determinacy.” Journal of the American Mathematical Society. Vol.2: 71–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschovakis, Y. (1980). Descriptive Set Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mycielski, J. and Steinhaus, H. (1962). “A mathematical axiom contradicting the axiom of choice.” Bulletin de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences. Vol.10: 1 – 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E., Suppes, P. Tarski, A. (Eds.). Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowbottom, R. (1964). “Some strong axioms of infinity incompatible with the axiom of constructibility.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin. Repr. in Annals of Mathematical Logic. Vol. 3: 1 – 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (1961). “Measurable cardinals and constructible sets.” Bulletin de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences. Vol. 9: 521–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (Ed.). (1971). Axiomatic Set Theory. Providence: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, J. (1966). “Some applications of model theory in set theory.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Revised version in Annals of Mathematical Logic. Vol. 3: 45–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, J. (1971). “The consistency of the GCH with the existence of a measurable cardinal,” in (Scott 1971, 391–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, J. (1971a). “Measurable cardinals and Δ1 3 well-orderings.” Annals of Mathematics. Vol. 94: 414 – 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solovay, R. M. (1969). “On the cardinality of Σ1 2 sets of reals,” in (Bulloff 1969, 58–73).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1962). “Some problems and results relevant to the foundations of set theory, “ in (Nagel et. al. 1962, 125–35).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulam, S. (1930). “Zur Masstheorie in der allgemeinen Mengenlehre.” Fundamenta Mathematica. Vol. 16: 140–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maddy, P. (2000). Mathematical Progress. In: Grosholz, E., Breger, H. (eds) The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Synthese Library, vol 289. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5391-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9558-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics