Advertisement

Global Environmental Policies: Between ‘Interstatist’ and ‘Transnational’ Arrangements

  • Bas Arts
Chapter
  • 128 Downloads
Part of the Environment & Policy book series (ENPO, volume 24)

Abstract

The political modernisation theory as outlined in chapter 1 will be applied to global environmental policies in this chapter. Therefore it is rather different in nature to the other case studies (chapters 4, 5, 7 and 8). As a global focus will replace the national one, some introductionary comments on policies in the global system will be made in this introduction. These will be followed by a short history of global environmental policies (section 2). Such historical insights are needed in order to be able to diagnose policy change in the last three decades. But to do so, knowledge of current developments in global environmental policies is inevitably needed as well. Therefore sections 3 and 4, next, discuss two issues which arose in the 1980s and for which policies have been designed and implemented in the 1990s: biodiversity and climate change. By dealing with these empirical domains, data and insights will be gathered on the basis of which the political modernisation theory can be applied and, hopefully, enriched. Section 5 deals with the four dimensions of a policy arrangement — policy coalitions, power, rules, and discourses — and ‘inserts’ the empirical data of the earlier sections into this theoretical scheme. Subsequently, the political modernisation thesis — the stability and change of policy arrangements in time — is considered in section 6. In section 7, finally, some conclusions are drawn.

Keywords

Clean Development Mechanism United Nations Environment Programme Joint Implementation Epistemic Community Policy Arrangement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, W. (1991), Sustainable Development and the ‘Greening’ of Development Theory, Niccos seminar ’Development Theories in the Nineties, Nijmegen: KUN.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, C. (1983), International Organizations, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  3. Arts, B. (1994a), Dauerhafte Entwicklung: eine begriffliche Abgrenzung, Peripherie. Zeitschrift fur Politik und Okonomie in der Dritten Welt, 14, (54), pp. 6–27.Google Scholar
  4. Arts, B. (1994b), The Survival of the Fittest? The North-South power struggle in the formation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, F. Schuurman, eds., Current Issues in Development Studies. Global Dimensions of Agency and Structure, Saarbrücken: Dreitenbach Publ., pp. 309–363.Google Scholar
  5. Arts, B. (1998), The Political Influence of Global NGOs. Case Studies on the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions, Utrecht: Van Arkel/International Books.Google Scholar
  6. Arts, B. and E. Mulleneers (1995), Vijftig jaar Verenigde Naties, vijfentwintig jaar mondiaal milieubeleid, B. Bomert and W. Van Genugten, eds., Vijftig Jaar Verenigde Naties: Grote Problemen, Bescheiden Middelen, Nijmegen: Studiecentrum voor Vredesvraagstukken, Cahier 66, pp. 125–156.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (1997), Global Risk Politics, M. Jacobs, eds., Greening the Millennium? The new politics of the environment, Oxford: The Political Quarterly/Blackwell, pp. 18–33.Google Scholar
  8. Bergesen, H. and G. Parmann, eds. (1993), Green Globe Yearbook 1993. An independent publication on environment and development from the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Norway, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bodansky, D. (1993), The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary, Yale Journal of International Law, 18 (451), pp. 453–559.Google Scholar
  10. Boehmer-Christiansen, S. (1994), Scientific Uncertainty and Power Politics: The Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Role of Scientific Advice, B. Spector, G. Sjöstedt and I. Zartman, eds., Negotiating International Regimes. Lessons. Learned from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), London: Graham and Trotham/Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 171–180.Google Scholar
  11. Burhenne-Guilmin, F. and S. Casey-Lefkowitz (1992), The New Law of Biodiversity, G. Handl, eds., Yearbook of International Environmental Law, London: Graham and Trotman/Martinus Nijhof, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
  12. Caldwell, L.K. (1990), International Environmental Policy. Emergence and Dimensions, Durham, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carroll, J.E., eds. (1988), International Environmental Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, P. and M. Finger (1994), The Earth Brokers. Power, Politics and World Development, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Clegg, S.R. (1989), Frameworks of Power, London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, K. and D. Earshaw (1992), The Implementation and Enforcement of European Community Environment Legislation, Environmental Politics, 1 (4), pp. 213–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duijse, P., A. Nentjes and J. Krozer (1998), Verhandelbare CO2-Emissierechten, Den Haag: Instituut voor Toegepaste Milieu-Economie.Google Scholar
  18. ECOSOC (1995) E/AC.70/1995/CRP.1, Working Document for the Second Session of the Open-Ended Working Group on the Review of Arrangements for Consultation with Non-Governmental Organizations.Google Scholar
  19. ENB (1997a), Report of the Third Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change, Earth Negotiation Bullitin, 12 (76).Google Scholar
  20. ENB (1997b), Summary of the 19th United Nations General Assembly Special Session to Review Implementation of Agenda 21, Earth Negotiation Bullitin, 5 (88).Google Scholar
  21. Feld, W. and R. Jordan (1983), International Organizations. A Comparative Approach, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  22. French, H.F. (1994), Making Environmental Treaties Work, Scientific American, (December 1994), pp. 94–97.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Glowka, L., F. Burhenne-Guilmin, et al. (1994), A Guide to the Convention on Biological DiversityGland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  25. Guzzini, S. (1993), Structural power: the limits of neorealist power analysis International Organization47(3, Summer 1993), pp. 443–478. Google Scholar
  26. Haas, P.M. (1993), Epistemic Communities and the Dynamics of International Environmental Co-Operation, V. Rittberger, eds., Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 168–201.Google Scholar
  27. Hocking, B. and M. Smith (1990), World Politics. An introduction to international relations, New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  28. Hoogenboom, B. (1998), Mexico and the NAFTA Environment Debate. The Transnational Politics of Economic Integration, Utrecht: Van Arkel/Intemational Books.Google Scholar
  29. Hurrell, A. and B. Kingsbury, eds. (1992), The International Politics of the Environment. Actors, Interests, and Institutions, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. IPCC (1990a), Policymakers Summary of the Scientific Assessment of Climate Change. Report to IPCC from Working Group I,Geneva.Google Scholar
  31. IPCC (1990b), Policymakers Summary of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change. Report from Working Group II to IPCC, Geneva.Google Scholar
  32. IPCC (1990c), Policymakers Summary of the Formulation of Response Strategies. Report prepared for IPCC by Working Group III, Geneva.Google Scholar
  33. Jacobs, M., eds. (1997), Greening the Millennium? The new politics of the environment, Oxford: The Political Quarterly/Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Jacobson, H. (1984),Networks of Interdependence. International organizations and the global political systemNew York: Alfred A. Knopf. Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, S. (1993), The Earth Summit: The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, London: Graham and Trotman/Martinus Nijhof.Google Scholar
  36. Juma, C. (1989), The Gene Hunters. Biotechnology and the Scramble for Seeds, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  37. Kaelberer, M. (1992), State Power and International Environmental Cooperation: A Comparison of Collaborative Efforts on Global Warming and Ozone Layer Depletion, ISA Convention, Princeton University, Department of Politics, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  38. Käkönen, J., eds. (1994), Green Security or Militarized Environment, Dartmouth: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  39. Kaufmann, J. (1980), United Nations Decision Making, Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthof and Noordhof.Google Scholar
  40. Keohane, R.O. and J.S. Nye, eds. (1989), Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition, Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
  41. Koch, K., R. Soetenendorp and A. van Staden, eds. (1994), Internationale Betrekkingen. Theorieën en Benaderingen, Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar
  42. Lélé, S. (1991), Sustainable development: a critical review, Word Development, 19 (6), pp. 607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liefferink, J.D., P.D. Lowe and A.P.J. Mol eds. (1993), European Integration and Environmental Policy, London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lieshout, R. (1993), Anarchie en Hierarchie. Een theorie van internationale betrekkingen en buitenlandse politiek, Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
  45. Lukes, S. (1974), Power. A Radical View, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. McCormick, J. (1989), The Global Environmental Movement, London: Belhaven Press. Miller, M.A.L. (1995), The Third World in Global Environmental Politics, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mintzer, I.M. and J.A. Leonard, eds. (1994), Negotiating Climate Change. The inside story of the Rio convention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mitchell, J. (1998), Companies in a World of Conflict, London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  49. Morgenthau, H.J. (1993), Politics among Nations. The struggle for power and peace, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  50. Nelissen, N.,J. Van der Straaten and L. Klinkers, eds. (1997), Classics in Environmental Studies. An Overview of Classic Texts in Environmental Studies,Utrecht: Van Arkel/International Books.Google Scholar
  51. Opschoor, H. (1989), Het nieuwe denken in het Kremlin en milieuveiligheid, Transaktie, 18 (4), pp. 347–356.Google Scholar
  52. Paterson, M. (1996), IR theory: Neorealism, Neoinstitutionalism and the Climate Change Convention, J. Vogler and M. Imber, eds., The Environment and International Relations, London: Routledge, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
  53. Princen, T. and M. Finger (1994), Environmental NGOs in world politics. Linking the local to the global, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Ray, L.R. (1987), Global Politics, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  55. Redclift, M. (1987), Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions, London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reinalda, B. (1997), Private in Form and Public in Purpose: (I)NGOs as Political Actors in World Politics, ECPR 25th joint sessions of workshops, Bem, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  57. Risse-Kappen, T., eds. (1995), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In. Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, Cambridge: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rowlands, I. and M. Greene, eds. (1992), Global Environmental Change and International Relations, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  60. Sabatier, P.A. (1987), Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change, and advocacy coalition framework, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8 (4), pp. 649–692.Google Scholar
  61. Sachs, I. (1980), Stratégies de l’écodéveloppement,Paris.Google Scholar
  62. Sanchez, V. and C. Juma, eds. (1994), Biodiplomacy. Genetic Resources and International Relations, Nairobi: ACTS Press.Google Scholar
  63. Schermers, H.G. (1985), Inleiding tot het Internationale Institutionele Recht, Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  64. Schermers, H.G. (1985), Internationaal Publiekrecht voor de Rechtspraktijk, Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  65. Schneider, S.H. (1989), The Changing Climate, Scientific America, (September 1989), pp. 38–47.Google Scholar
  66. Strange, S. (1988), States and Markets, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  67. Thompson-Feraru, A. (1974), Transnational Political Interests and the Global Environment, International Organization, 28 (1), pp. 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tolba, M.K. and O.A. El-Kholy (1992), The World Environment 1972–1992. Two decades of challenge, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  69. UNEP (1994), Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and Annexes,Geneva.Google Scholar
  70. Waltz, K.N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McCraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  71. Waters, M. (1995), Globalization, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Weiss, Thomas G., David P. Forsythe and Roger A. Coate (1994), The United Nations and Changing World Politics, Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  73. Weiss, L. (1997), Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State, New Left Review, 225, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  74. Wendt, A.E. (1987), The agent-structure problem in international relation theory, International Organization, 41 (3, Summer 1987), pp. 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wendt, A. E. (1992), Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics, International Organization, 46 (2, Spring 1992), pp. 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Willets, P., eds. (1982), Pressure Groups in the Global System, London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  77. Willets, P. (1996), From Stockholm to Rio and beyond: the impact of the environmental movement on the United Nations consultative arrangements for NGOs, Review of International Studies, 22 (1), pp. 57–80.Google Scholar
  78. Woerdman, E. (1997), Internationale onderhandelingen over klimaatbeleid: emissiereductie, Joint Implementation en verhandelbare emissierechten, Milieu, 1997 (5), pp. 218–227.Google Scholar
  79. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our common future, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Young, O.R. and G. Osherenko (1993), Testing Theories of Regime Formation: Finding from a Large Collaborative Research Project, V. Rittberger, eds., Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 223–251.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bas Arts

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations