Advertisement

Policy Arrangements

  • Bas Arts
  • Jan van Tatenhove
  • Pieter Leroy
Chapter
Part of the Environment & Policy book series (ENPO, volume 24)

Abstract

In chapter 1 we defined the concept of institutionalisation as a process of structuration and stabilisation by which policy arrangements are produced, reproduced or transformed. This process was, moreover, analysed in terms of ‘duality of structure’, which implies that change will occur through agents-ininteraction as well as through long-term structural transformations. These latter transformations were, as far as the political domain of society is concerned, conceptualised in the previous chapter as political modernisation. We consider this to be a long-term background process, the three stages of which can be characterised by certain practices and discourses with regard to governance on the one hand and by state, market and civil society interrelations on the other. As stated earlier, these successive discourses and practices give rise to different ‘ideal-types’ of policy arrangements. Although obviously coloured by their period of birth, such policy arrangements are not entirely determined by a particular stage of political modernisation, as they are the outcome of specific interactions between certain actors in day-to-day policy processes. We consider policy arrangements therefore as the concept that links long-term processes of political change with specific processes of policy making and implementation on the ground.

Keywords

Policy Discourse Policy Domain Policy Arrangement Interpretative Scheme Political Modernisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrow, M. (1996), The Global Age. State and Society Beyond Modernity, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arts, B. (1990), Brundtland en het concept van interdependentie, B. Arts, eds., Ontwikkeling, Milieu en Veiligheid: Mondiale Interdependentie, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Jan Mets, pp. 5–35.Google Scholar
  3. Arts, B. (1994), Dauerhafte Entwicklung: eine begriffliche Abgrenzung, Peripherie. Zeitschrift fur Politik und Okonomie in der Dritten Welt, 14 (54), pp. 6–27.Google Scholar
  4. Arts, B. (1998), The Political Influence of Global NGOs. Case Studies on the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions, Utrecht: Van Arkelllnternational Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bachrach, P. and M. Baratz (1962), Two Faces of Power, American Political Science Review, 56, pp. 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, U. (1996), World Risk Society as Cosmopolitan Society? Ecological Questions in a Framework of Manufactured Uncertainties, Theory, Culture & Society, 13 (4), pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (1997), Global Risk Politics, M. Jacobs, eds., Greening the Millennium? The new politics of the environment, Oxford: The Political Quarterly/Blackwell, pp. 18–33.Google Scholar
  8. Benton, T. (1997), Beyond Left and Right? Ecological Politics, Capitalism and Modernity, M. Jacobs, eds., Greening the Millennium? The new politics of the environment, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 34–46.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (1996), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume I, The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford UK, Malden USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M. (1997), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume II, The Power of Identity, Oxford UK, Malden USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (1998), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume 111 End of Millennium, Oxford UK, Malden USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, I.J. (1989), Structuration Theory. Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life, London: MacMillan Education Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. De Swaan, A. (1988), In care of the state: health care, education and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era,Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dryzek, J.S. (1997), The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Frouws, J. (1993), Mest en macht. Een politiek-sociologische studie naar belangenbehartiging en beleidsvorming inzake de mestproblematiek in Nederland vanaf 1970,Wageningen.Google Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. (1981), A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 1 Power, property and the state, London, Basingstoke: The MacMillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. (1985), The Nation-State and Violence, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Guzzini, S. (1993), Structural power: the limits of neorealist power analysis, International Organization, 47 (3), pp. 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hajer, M.A. (1997), The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Held, D. (1995), Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hoogenboom, B. (1998), Mexico and the NAFTA Environment Debate. The Transnational Politics of Economic Integration, Utrecht: Van Arkel/International Books.Google Scholar
  23. Huber, J. (1985), Ecologische modernisering, E. Van den Abbeele, eds., Ontmanteling van de groei. Leesboek over een andere economie, Nijmegen: Markant, pp. 161–168.Google Scholar
  24. Kickert, W.J.M., E.H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan eds. (1997), Managing Complex Networks. Strategies for the Public Sector, London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  25. Kolk, J.E.M. (1996), Forests in international environmental politics: international organisations, NGOs and the Brazilian Amazon, Utrecht: InternationalGoogle Scholar
  26. Books. Krasner, S.D. (1985), Structural conflict: The Third World against global liberalism, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Liefferink, J.D. (1995), Environmental policy on the way to Brussels. The issue of acidification between the Netherlands and the European Community, Wageningen: WAU.Google Scholar
  28. Litfin, K.T. (1994), Ozone Discourses: science and politics in global environmental cooperation, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lukes, S. (1974), Power. A Radical View, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Mol, A.P.J. (1995), The Refinement of Production. Ecological modernization theory and the chemical industry, Utrecht: Van Arkel.Google Scholar
  31. Nelissen, N.J.M. (1992), Besturen binnen verschuivende grenzen, Zeist: Kerckebosch.Google Scholar
  32. Princen, T. and M. Finger (1994), Environmental NGOs in world politics. Linking the local to the global, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Sabatier, P.A. (1987), Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change, and advocacy coalition framework, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8 (4), pp. 649–692.Google Scholar
  34. Sachs, I. (1977), Het menselijke leefmilieu, J. Tinbergen, eds., Naar een Rechtvaardige Internationale Orde. Een rapport van de Club van Rome, Amsterdam: Elsevier: pp. 309–321.Google Scholar
  35. Schattschneider, E.E. (1960), The semisovereign people: a realist’s view of democracy in America, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  36. Schumacher, E.F. (1974), Small is Beautiful. A Study of Economics as if People Mattered, London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  37. Strange, S. (1988), States and Markets, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  38. Waltz, K.N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McCraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Wapner, P. (1995), Politics Beyond the State. Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics, World Politics, 47 (3), pp. 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willets, P., eds. (1982), Pressure Groups in the Global System, London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  41. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our common future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bas Arts
  • Jan van Tatenhove
  • Pieter Leroy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations