Advertisement

The Institutionalisation of Environmental Politics

  • Jan van Tatenhove
  • Pieter Leroy
Chapter
Part of the Environment & Policy book series (ENPO, volume 24)

Abstract

In this chapter we focus on the institutionalisation of environmental politics as this domain emerged in Western European countries from the early 1970s. Institutionalisation is used here in its sociological meaning, referring to the construction and the preservation of day-to-day activities and interactions of actors in institutions, within a context of processes of societal and political change. More specifically, institutionalisation is regarded as the process leading to the formation, deformation and reformation of policy arrangements.

Keywords

Civil Society Environmental Policy Environmental Politics Agenda Setting Policy Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrecht, S.L. (1975), The Environment as Social Problem, A.L. Mauss, Social Problems as social movements, New York, pp. 556 - 605.Google Scholar
  2. Bachrach, P. and M. Baratz (1970), Power and Poverty: theory and practice, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bader, V.M. (1991), Collectief handelen: sociale ongelijkheid en collectief handelen, Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
  4. Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates (1975), The theory of environmental policy, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Blowers, A. and P. Leroy (1996), Environment and Society: shaping the future, Blowers, A. and P. Glasbergen eds., Environmental Policy in an International Context, book 3 - Prospects, London, pp. 255-283Google Scholar
  6. Blowers, A. (1997), Environmental Policy - Ecological Modernization or the Risk Society, Urban Studies, 34 (5/6), 845 - 871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buttel, F.H., A.P. Hawkins, et al. (1990), From Limits to Growth to Global Change - Constraints and Contradictions in the Evolution of Environmental Science and Ideology, Global Environmental Change, 1(1), 57 - 66.Google Scholar
  8. Buttel, F.H. and P. Taylor (1992), Environmental sociology and global environmental change - A critical assessment, Society and Natural Resources, (5), pp. 211-230.Google Scholar
  9. Cobb, R.W. and C.D. Elder (1972), Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, M.D., J.G. March, and J.P. Olson (1972), A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1), pp. 1 - 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downs, A. (1972), Up and Down with Ecology. The ‘issue-attention cycle’, Public Interest, 28, pp. 38 - 50.Google Scholar
  12. Eijk, C. van der and W.J.P. Kok (1975), Non-decisions reconsidered, Acta Politica, 10, pp. 277 - 301.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, R. and J. Kling (1993), Mobilizing the community, Newbury park: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Garner, R. (1996), Environmental Politics, London: Prentice Hall, Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  15. Glasbergen, P. eds. (1998), Co-operative Environmental Governance. Public-Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  16. Hajer, M. (1997), The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hanf, K. (1996), Implementing International Environmental Policies, A. Blowers and P. Glasbergen (eds.), Environmental Policy in and International Context III. Prospects, London: Arnold, pp. 197 - 222.Google Scholar
  18. Hannigan, J.A. (1995), Environmental Sociology. A social constructionist perspective, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Jänicke, M. and H. Weidner, eds. (1995), Successful Environmental Policy. A Critical Evaluation of 24 Cases, Berlin: Edition Sigma.Google Scholar
  20. Kingdon, J.W. (1984), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, Boston, Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  21. Klok, P.J. (1991), Een instrumententheorie voor milieubeleid: de toepassing en effectiviteit van beleidsinstrumenten, Enschede: Universiteit Twente, Faculteit Bestuurskunde.Google Scholar
  22. Liberatore, A. (1995), The Social Construction of Environmental Problems, P. Glasbergen and A. Blowers, Environmental Policy in an International Context, Tome I - Perspectives, London, New York: Wiley, pp. 59 - 84.Google Scholar
  23. Ligteringen, J.L. (1999), The feasibility of Dutch environmental policy instruments,Enschede.Google Scholar
  24. March, J.G. and J.P. Olson (1984), The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life, The American Political Science Review, 78 (3), pp. 734 - 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mayntz, R. (1978), Vollzugsprobleme der Umweltpolitik. Empirische Untersuchung der Implementation von Gesetzen im Bereich der Lufteinhaltung und des Gewaesserschutzes, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  26. Meadows, D.L. (1972), Rapport aan de Club van Rome. De grenzen aan de groei, Utrecht, Antwerpen: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  27. Mol, A.P.J. (1995), The Refinement of Production. Ecological modernization theory and the chemical industry, Utrecht: Van Arkel.Google Scholar
  28. Opschoor, J.B. and H.B. Vos (1989), Economic instruments for environmental protection, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  29. Potter, D. (1995), Environmental problems in their political context, Blowers, A. and P. Glasbergen eds., Environmental Policy in an International Context, book I - Perspectives, London, pp. 85-110Google Scholar
  30. Pressman, J.L. and A. Wildaysky (1973), Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, Why it‘s amazing that Federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Schoenfeld, A.C., R.F. Meier and R.J. Griffin (1979), Constructing a social problem: the press and the environment, Social Problems, 27 (1), pp. 38 - 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spaargaren, G. (1997), The Ecological Modernization of Production and Consumption. Essays in Environmental Sociology, Wageningen: WAU.Google Scholar
  33. Steunenberg, B., J. de Vries, and J.L. Soeters (1996), Het neo-institutionalisme in de bestuurskunde, Bestuurskunde, 5(5), pp. 212 - 216.Google Scholar
  34. Van Tatenhove, J. (1993), Milieubeleid onder dak? Beleidsvoeringsprocessen in het Nederlandse milieubeleid in de periode 1979-1990; nader uitgewerkt voor de Gelderse Vallei, Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
  35. Vermeulen, W. (1992), De vervuiler betaald. Onderzoek naar de werking van subsidies op vier deelterreinen van het milieubeleid, Utrecht: Van Arkel.Google Scholar
  36. Weale, A. (1992), The new politics of pollution, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wells, D.T. (1996), Environmental Policy: A Global Perspective for the Twenty-First Century, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Yearley, S. (1992), The Green Case. A sociology of environmental issues, arguments and politics, London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Zald, M.N. and J.D. McCarthy, eds. (1979), The dynamics of social movements: resource mobilization, social control, and tactics, Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan van Tatenhove
  • Pieter Leroy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations