Skip to main content

Capitum Selectum, Crossover Studies with Continuous Variables: Power Analysis

  • Chapter
Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials

Abstract

The crossover design is a sensitive means of determining the efficacy of new drugs because it eliminates between subject-variability. However, when the response in the first period carries on into the second (carryover effects) or when time factors can not be kept constant in a lengthy crossover (time effects), the statistical power of testing may be jeopardized. We recently demonstrated that the crossover design with binary variables is a powerful method in spite of such factors as carryover effects. Power analysis of crossover trials with continuous variables have not been explicitly studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Niemeyer MG, Zwinderman AH, Cleophas TJ, De Vogel EM. Crossover studies are a better format for comparing equivalent treatments than parallel-group studies. In: Kuhlmann J, Mrozikiewicz A, eds, What should a clinical pharmacologist know to start a clinical trial (phase I and II). Munich, Germany, Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 1998, pp 40–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scheffé H. Mixed models. In: Scheffé H, ed, The analysis of variance. New York, Wiley & Sons, 1959, pp 261–91.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cleophas TJ. Crossover studies: a modified analysis with more power. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 53: 515–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Willan AR,Pater JL. Carryover and the two-period crossover clinical trial. Biometrics 1986; 42: 593–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman PR. The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials. Stat Med 1989; 8: 1421–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fleiss JA. A critique of recent research on the two-treatment crossover design. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 237–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seim S. The AB/BA crosover: past, present and future. Stat Methods Med Res 1994; 3: 303–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grieve AP. Bayesian analyses of two-treatment crossover studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1994; 3: 407–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cleophas TJ, Van Lier HH. Clinical trilas with binary responses: power analyses. J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 36: 198–204.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nies AS, Spielberg SP. Individualization of drug therapy. In: Hardman JL et al., eds, Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hi11, 1996, pp 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cleophas, T.J., Zwinderman, A.H., Cleophas, T.F. (2000). Capitum Selectum, Crossover Studies with Continuous Variables: Power Analysis. In: Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9508-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9508-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6184-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9508-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics