Skip to main content

Historic Roots of Team Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
Work Teams: Past, Present and Future

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 6))

Abstract

Current levels of development in the theory and practice of work teams rest on a complex historical foundation. This chapter provides an overview of that foundation with an emphasis on early laboratory research and practical developments at work sites in Western Europe, the U.S., and Australia. The contributions of major thought leaders are mentioned, including Lewin, Emery, and Trist. And the path of development is traced up to the recent use of virtual teams. The theory continues to be further elaborated by field studies in a wide range of settings and by practice that has spread to new areas of business, to non-profit organizations, and to government. Finally, the business case for use of teams is briefly addressed, emphasizing the point that teams are so widely used now that the quality of their implementation rather than their presence is the key to competitive advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allport, F. H. (1924). Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allred, B. B., Snow, C. C. & Miles R. E. (1996). Characteristics of managerial careers in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 10(4), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. In. H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, Leadership, and Men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1950a). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15, 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1950b). Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in Group Problem-Solving. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Competitive organizational behavior: Toward an organizationally-based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartmess, A. & Cerny, K. (1993). Building competitive advantage through a global network of capabilities. California Management Review, 35(2), 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. G., & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1967-present). Advances in experimental social psychology (32 volumes). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, P. (1992). The learning curve at Volvo. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Classic Readings in Self-Managing Teamwork. King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2), 345–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyerlein, M. M., Johnson, D. A., & Beyerlein, S. T. (1994-present). Advances in the interdisciplinary study of work teams (six volumes). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, M. T., Salas, E., & Prince, C. (Eds.) (1997). Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickner, M. A., Harkins, S. G. & Ostrom, T. M. (1986). Effects of personal involvement: Thought-provoking implications for social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 763–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caminiti, S. (1995, February 20). What Team Leaders Need to Know. Fortune, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M. & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P. & Crocker-Hefter, A. (1996, Winter). Distinctive human resources are firms’ core competencies. Organizational Dynamics, 24(3), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. & Zander, A. (1953). Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, A. C. (1994). Bringing Out the Best in People. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W. Jr. & Evans, J. R. (1994). Total Quality Management, Organization, and Strategy. Minneapolis: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1895/1982). Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E. (1959/1978). The emergence of a new paradigm of work. Canberra, Australia: Center for Continuing Education, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18,21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E. & Trist, E. L. (1969). Socio-technical systems. In F. E. Emery (Ed.) Systems Thinking. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A. (1954). A theory of social comparison. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A., Schachter, S. & Back, K. (1950). Social Pressures in Informal Groups. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, K. (1993). Leading Self-Directed Work Teams: A Guide to Developing New Team Leadership Skills. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. (Ed.). (1995). Mary Parker Follett—Prophet of Management: A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Salas, E. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that Work (and Those That Don’t): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E., Ill (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 55, 259–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: A test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 7(5),250–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R., (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1976). Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading Groups in Organizations. In Goodman & Associates, Designing Effective Workgroups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. (1998). Organizational support systems for team-based organizations: Employee collaboration through organizational structures. Dissertation, University of North Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammei, M. (1996). Beyond reengineering: How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. New York: Harper Business

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W. F. (1977). Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM): The conceptual framework, derived rating scales, and an updated bibliography. Small Group Behavior, 4, 355–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. I. (1987). The History of the National Training Laboratories 1947–1986: Social Equality Through Education and Training. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, D, & Willard, M. (1995). Why teams can fail and what to do about it: Essential tools for anyone implementing self directed work teams. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin Professional Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1950). The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J. & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of grjoup size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70,371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E. & Associates (Eds.). (1992). Diversity in the Workplace: Human Resources Initiatives. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E. & Ruderman, M. N. (Eds.). (1995). Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. & Mann, I. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, F. P. (1994). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skilh. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1966/1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenback, J. R. & Smith, D. K. (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 819–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. & Bruun, S. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz, D. A. & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 936–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B., Williams, K. & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III (1984-present). Advances in group processes (16 volumes). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III (1988). High involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III (1992). The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., III, Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E. (1992). Employee involvement and total quality management: Practices and results in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concepts, method and reality in social science, social equilibrium and social change. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., Lippett, R., & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1967). The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual Teams: Reaching across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J. W. (Ed). (1987). Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankin, D., Cohen, S. G., & Bikson, T. K. (1996). Teams & technology: Fulfilling the promise of the new organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-Leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5(3), 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P. (1993). Business without Bosses: How Self Managing Teams are Building High-Performing Companies. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. (1933). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1950). Introduction. In G. C. Homans’ The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1994). Fit, failure and the hall of fame. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M., Jr. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldaschl, M., & Weber, W. G. (1998). The “three waves” of industrial group work: Historical reflections on current research on group work. Human Relations, 51, 347–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1985). Social Influence and Conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.) The Handbook of social Psychology. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsburn, J. D., Moran, L., Musselwhite, E., & Zenger, J. H. (1990). Self-directed work teams: The new American challenge. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, R. I. (1983). The Management and Maintenance of Quality Circles. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava, C. H. P. (1984). Managing new office technology: An organizational strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegels, C. C. (1995). Total Quality Management: A Survey of Its Important Aspects. Danvers, MA: Boyd & Fraser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage through People. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1995). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R. J. (Ed.). (1991). Leadership, Perspective, and Restructuring for Total Quality. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D. S. & Hickson, D. J. (1989). Writers on Organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R. E., & Pasmore, W. A. (1992). Organizing for learning: Research in Organizational Change and Development, 6, 37–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, H., & Finley, M. (1995). Why teams don’t work: What went wrong and how to make it right. Princeton, NJ: Petersons Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. J. & Dickson, W. J. (1939/1967). Management and the Worker: An account of research conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruderman, M. N., Hughes-James, M. W. & Jackson, S. E. (Eds.). (1996).Selected Research on Work Team Diversity. Washing, DC: American Psychological Association; Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, R., & Kwum, S. K. (1993). Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78,450–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, F. P. & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Groups as human resources. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 5, 323–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27(187), 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M. J. & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E., Mclntyre, M., Halfhill, R., & Richards, H. (in press). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in Social Psychology of Inter group Relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982) Instrumentality, identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Inter group Relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. C. (1982). Quality Circles: How to Make Them Work in America. New York: Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. (1981). The socio-technical perspective: The evolution of socio-technical systems as a conceptual framework and as an action research program. In A. H. Van de Ven & W. F. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior, pp. 17–75. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal getting. Human Relations14, 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L., Higgin, G. W., Murray, H. Pollock, A. G. (1963). Organizational Choice: Capabilities of Groups at the Coal Face Under Changing Conditions. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E., Emery, F., & Murray, H. (1997). The social engagement of social science: A Tavistock anthology, Vol. 3: The socio-ecological perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E., & Murray, H. (1990). The social engagement of social science: A Tavistock anthology, Vol. 1: The socio-psychologicalperspective. Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E., Murray, H., & Trist, B. (1993). The social engagement of social science: A Tavistock anthology, Vol. 2: The socio-technical perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965) Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages in small group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2, 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 3, 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E. (1977). Work innovations at Topeka: After six years. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 75,422–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 76–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, M.R. (1987). Productive Workplaces: Organizing and Managing for Dignity, Meaning, and Community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, P. (1997). Hammer’s horror story is beyond redemption. People Management, 3(6), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., Harkins, S.G. & Latane, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Porter, G., Beyerlein, M. (2000). Historic Roots of Team Theory and Practice. In: Beyerlein, M.M. (eds) Work Teams: Past, Present and Future. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9492-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9492-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5609-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9492-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics