Skip to main content

Information and Communication Technology and the Redefinition of the Functional and Normative Boundaries of Government

  • Chapter
Governance in Modern Society

Part of the book series: Library of Public Policy and Public Administration ((LPPP,volume 4))

Abstract

In 1996 the Dutch parliament passed a law (the Koppelingswet), which enables a large number of (quasi-) public and private organizations, like the immigrant office, the tax administration, social security agencies, hospitals and notary’s offices, to exchange electronic data regarding the permit of residency of foreigners and immigrants. The goal of this coupling operation is the reduction of fraud and abuse of services by people who have no residency permit. The information resources of the immigrant offices and other organizations are being shared and integrated, which leads to changes in the organizational boundaries of these organizations; to some extent they are beginning to blur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, J.S. (1980) Interorganizational processes and organization boundary activities. In: Staw, B.J. and G.R. Salancik (eds.) Research in organizational behavior 2: 321–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. (1979) Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barret, S. and B. Konsynski (1982) Interorganizational information sharing systems. MIS Quaterly Special Issue 6: 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, V.J.J.M. (1993) Nieuwe vormen van sturing en informatisering. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, V.J.J.M. (1998) Grenzeloze overheid. Over ICT en grensveranderingen in het openbaar bestuur. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, V.J.J.M. (1998) Wiring public organization and changing organizational boundaries. In: LTh.M. Snellen and W.B.J.H. van de Donk (eds.) Public administration in the information age. Amsterdam/Berlin/Oxford/Tokyo/Washington: IOS Press. 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J.K. (1975) The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quaterly 20: 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkens M.C. et al (1997) Beginselen van de democratische rechtsstaat. Deventer: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. and E. Friedberg (1980) Actors and systems. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donk, W.B.J.H. van de. De schema in arena. Lelystad: Vermande.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1965) A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W.M. (1966) The organization-set: towards a theory of interorganizational relations. In: J. Thompson (ed.) Approaches to organizational design. Pittsburg: Pittsburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissen, P.H.A. (1989) Bureaucratische cultuur en informatisering. Den Haag: SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissen, P.H.A. (1996) De virtuele Staat. Schoonhoven: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, J.E. and Th.E. Drabek (1973) Complex organizations. New York/London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. and R.L. Kahn (1966) The social psychology of organization. NewYork/London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhove, de D. (1996) Gekoppelde intelligentie. Epe: SMO

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. and P.E. White (1961) Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quaterly 5: 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manet, C.B. (1971) On the specification of interorganizational dimensions. Sociology and Social Research 56: 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.J. and A.K. Rice (1967) Systems of organization. London/New York: Tavistock

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979) The structuring of organization. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G.A. (1986) Images of organization. London/Beverly Hills/New Dehli: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, G. (1981) Power in organizations. Cambridge Mass: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, G. and G.R. Salancik (1978) The external control of organization. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot, A., R. Reichwald and R. Wigand (1995) Die grenzenloze Unternehmunng. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, J.A. (1987) Organizational economics: Notes on the use of transaction-cost theory in the study of organization. Adminsitrative Science Quaterly 32: 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1992) Organizations. Newbury Park/London/New Dehli: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1995) Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks/London/New Dehli: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. (1962) Organizations and output transactions. American Journal of Sociology 68 (3): 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. (1967) Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H., G. Walker and Liston (1979) Coordination patterns within an interorganizational network. Human Relations 32 (1): 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R.L. (1967) The interorganizational field as a focus for investigation. Administrative Science Quaterly 12: 396–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1969) The social psychology of organizing. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (1992) Systemtheorie. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby, M.B. Brewer and Y. Peng (1995) Collaboration structure and information dilemmas in biotechnology: organizational boundaries as trust production. National Bureau of Economic Research.Working Paper. Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuurmond, A. (1994) De infocratie. Rotterdam: Phaedrus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuurmond, A. and I.Th.M. Snellen (1997) From Bureaucracy to infocracy. In: Taylor, J.A., I.Th.M. Snellen and A. Zuurmond. Beyond BPR in public administration. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bekkers, V.J.J.M. (2000). Information and Communication Technology and the Redefinition of the Functional and Normative Boundaries of Government. In: van Heffen, O., Kickert, W.J.M., Thomassen, J.J.A. (eds) Governance in Modern Society. Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9486-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9486-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5594-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9486-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics