Skip to main content

Integrating Climate Policies in the European Environment: A Policy Report

  • Chapter
Book cover Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy

Abstract

The discussion on climate policy is still quite open, and many issues remain unsolved. Previous chapters have shown many advances and new useful results. However, the debate that took place during the Second EFIEA Policy Workshop on ‘Integrating Climate Policies in the European Environment’,1 where the above chapters have been circulated and discussed, is far richer than the results that they contain.2 This is why we would like to summarize in this concluding chapter the many ideas, proposals, doubts, conflicting and consensus views that were debated during the conference, that were discussed within the panel sessions, that are contained in the many papers that have been prepared for the conference, and of which only a small part is gathered in this book.

This report summarizes the main ideas, proposals, scientific achievements, consensus and conflicting issues that emerged at the Second EFIEA Policy Workshop, held at Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Palazzo delle Stelline, Corso Magenta 63, Milan, Italy, March 4–6,1999. EFIEA, the European Forum for Integrated Environmental Assessment, is a concerted action funded by the Environment and Climate Programme of the European Commission, Directorate-General XII (contract no. ENV4-CT97–0450). The two main objectives of the EFIEA are: (i) to improve the scientific quality of integrated environmental assessment; (ii) to strengthen the interaction between environmental science and policy making. In addition, the EFIEA fosters cooperation between scientists and decision makers inside the European Union, communication and cooperation outside the EU, and training of IEA techniques. The Second EFIEA Policy Workshop was devoted to improving communication and stimulate co-operation between different stakeholders, policy makers and scientists on the most relevant climate policy issues. The Authors of this report are grateful to Pier Vellinga and Richard Toi for many helpful suggestions and remarks. They have, however, the sole responsibility for the opinions expressed in the report and for any misrepresentation of some participants’ opinion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albrecht, Johan (1998). Environmental consumer subsidies and potential reduction of C02 emissions. Centre for Environmental Economics and Environmental Management, University of Gent. Working Paper 98/59, October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, Johan (1999). Making C02 emission trading more effective: integrating tradable certificates, Centre for Environmental Economics and Environmental Management, University of Gent. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banuri, T. et al. (1996). Equity and social considerations. In: Bruce et al. eds. Climate change 1995: economic and social dimension of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 79–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, Marcel, den Elzen, M. and Metz, B. (1999). Global climate protection and equitable burden sharing — an exploration of some options. Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, Peter (1999). International greenhouse gas emission trading — with special reference to the Kyoto Protocol. Department of Economics, Stockholm University. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosello, Francesco and Roson, Roberto (1999). Distributional consequences of alternative emissions trading schemes. FEEM and University Ca’ Foscari of Venice. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acutt, Melinda and Elliott, Caroline (1999). Regulatory conflict? Environmental and economic regulation of electricity generation. Department of Economics and Accounting, University of Liverpool, and Department of Economics, University of Lancaster. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlagh, Reyer (1999). Discounting and sustainability in applied IAMs. Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottinger, Hans. Economic damage control for greenhouse gas emissions. In: Keiei to Keizai, 78(2) September 1998, Economics Society of Nagasaki University. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Technical Assessment Reports. 1996,1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, Josef (1998). Joint implementation and clean development mechanism in the natural gas sector. Institute for Economy and the Environment at the University of St. Gallen and FEEM. Paper prepared for the Fourth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, organized by the International Energy Agency, ABB and the Paul Scherrer Institute, 30 August-2 September, 1998, Interlaken, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, Josef (1998). Strategies for risk management of joint implementation investments. In: Riemer, P., Smith, A. and Thambimuthu, K., eds. Greenhouse gas mitigation: technologies for activities implemented jointly. Elsevier, 357–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, Josef (1999). (Self-) enforcement of joint implementation and Clean Development Mechanism contracts. Institute for Economy and the Environment at the University of St. Gallen and FEEM. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, Michael (1999). International trade and the environment: how to handle carbon leakage. Department of Economics, University of Oslo. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, Chris (1999). Stabilisation and delayed cutbacks: incorporating sulphates into the calculation of impacts of two almost identical climate change scenarios. Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, Alan S. and Richels, Richard G. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol: a cost-effective strategy for meeting environmental objectives? Stanford University and EPRI. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsiliani, Laura (1999). Imperfect competition and environmental tax reforms: theory and evidence from Italian data. Tilburg University and Center for Economic Research. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsiliani, Laura and Renström, Thomas (1999a). Inequality and environment protection: a politico-economy approach. Tilburg University and Center for Economic Research. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsiliani, Laura and Renström, Thomas (1999b). Time inconsistency in environmental policy: tax earmarking as precommitment solution. Tilburg University and Center for Economic Research. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Philippe (1997). Institute for systems, informatics and safety — EC joint research centre ‘If you don’t know how to fix it, please stop breaking it!’ The precautionary principle and climate change. In: Foundations of Science. 2:263–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Philippe (1998). Institute for systems, informatics and safety — EC joint research centre New estimate of the carbon sink strength of EU forests integrating flux measurements, field surveys, and space observations: 0.17–0.35 Gt(C). Ambio. 27(7):1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Philippe (1999a). From communication to design in the European climate policy context. Institute for systems, informatics and safety — EC joint research centre. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Philippe (1999b). Care, clarity and completeness: keys to highlighting costs and identifying opportunities in the context of European climate policy design. Institute for systems, informatics and safety — EC joint research centre. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Pamela, Markyanda, Anil and Hunt, Alistair (1999). Measuring the indirect costs and benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation options: methodology and a case study from Hungary. University of Bath. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, Axel and Stronzik, Marcus (1999). Early crediting of emission reduction — a panacea or Pandora’s box? Center for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W.D. (1997). Discounting in economics and climate change: an editorial comment. Climatic Change. 37:315–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onigkeit, J. and Alcamo, J. A different perspective for global climate policy: combining burden sharing and climate protection. Centre for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Germany. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proost, S. (1999). Transport, urban air policies and climate change. Center for Economic Studies, Katholieke Universiteit of Leuven. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringius et al. (1997). Differentiation, leaders and fairness: negotiating climate commitments in the European Community. Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, Oslo, Norway. Report 1997–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Adam Z. and Casier, Stephen D. (1998). Carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. economy — a structural decomposition analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics. 11(3–4):1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Adam Z. and Edmonds, Jae (1998). International equity and differentiation in global warming policy. Environmental and Resource Economics. 12:25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Adam Z. (1999). Burden-sharing and climate change policy beyond Kyoto: implications for developing countries. Environmental and Development Economics. 3:392–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Adam Z., Bulte, Erwin and Folmer, Henk (1999). Long-run implications for developing countries of joint implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation. Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, Pennsylvania State University. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Adam Z. and Collamer, Nathan (1999). The changing role of transaction costs in the evolution of joint implementation. International Environmental Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Adam Z. and Stevens, Brandt (1999). A dynamic analysis of fairness in global warming policy: Kyoto, Buenos Aires and beyond. Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, Pennsylvania State University. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shogren, Jason (1999). Benefits and costs of Kyoto. University of Wyoming. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, P.R. (1999). Fairness in climate change: bridging the north-south divide. Indian Institute of Management. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, Richard (1998). Time discounting and optimal emission reduction: an application of FUND. In: Climatic Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, Richard (1999). Equitable cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, Richard (1999). The optimal timing of greenhouse gas emission abatement, individual rationality and intergenerational equity. Nota di Lavoro 3.98. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, Richard (1999). Welfare specifications and optimal control of climate change: an application of FUND. Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens et al. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol: an economic and game-theoretic interpretation. CLIMNEG Working Paper circulated at the Second EFIEA policy workshop, March 1999. Milan: FEEM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carraro, C., Goria, A. (2000). Integrating Climate Policies in the European Environment: A Policy Report. In: Carraro, C. (eds) Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9484-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9484-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5439-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9484-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics