Abstract
In December 1997, 38 industrialized and transitional countries agreed to the Kyoto Protocol, which committed them to targets and timetables to reduce six greenhouse gases (GHGs). In November 1998, in Buenos Aires, at the Fourth Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP-4), efforts were made to improve upon Kyoto by expanding the number of co-operating countries and enhancing the range of policy instruments to implement its objectives. However, COP-4 was a failure, as only two developing countries made commitments, and little progress was made in increasing the flexibility of policy implementation.
Adam Rose is Professor and Head of the Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Brandt Stevens is an Economist with the Demand Analysis Office, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA. The authors wish to thank Shu Yi Liao for his assistance in compiling some of the data and in running the simulations. The views expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the positions of the institutions with which they are affiliated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agarwal, A. and S. Narain (1991). Global warming in an unequal world: a case of environmental colonialism. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.
Barrett, S. (1992). Acceptable allocations of tradeable carbon emission entitlements in a global warming treaty. In: S. Barrett et alCombating global warming. Geneva, Switzerland: UNCTAD.
Barrett, S, M. Grubb, K. Roland, A. Rose, R. Sandor and T. Tietenberg (1992). Combating global warming: a global system of tradeable carbon emission entitlements. Geneva, Switzerland: UNCTAD.
Chao, H. and S. Peck (1998). Pareto optimal environmental control and income distribution with global climate change. Discussion Paper, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
Cline, W. (1992). Economics of global warming. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 3:1–44.
Edmonds, J., M. Wise and D. Barns (1995). Carbon coalitions: the cost and effectiveness of energy agreements to alter trajectories of atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy. 23:309–35.
Eyckmans, J, S. Proost and E. Schokkaert (1993). Efficiency and distribution in greenhouse negotiations. Kyklos. 46:363–97.
Fankhauser, S. (1994). The social costs of greenhouse gas emissions: an expected value approach. Energy Journal. 15:155–84.
Framework Convention on Climate Change, Conference of the Parties (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Kyoto, 10 December.
Halsnaes, K. (1996). The economics of climate change mitigation in developing countries. Energy Policy. 24:917–27.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1996). Climate change: economic assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larsen, B. and A. Shah (1994). Global tradable carbon permits, participation incentives and transfers. Oxford Economic Papers. 46:841–56.
Manne, A. and R. Richels (1991). Global C02 emission reductions: the impacts of rising energy costs. Energy Journal, 12:87–107.
Nordhaus, W. and Z. Yang (1996). A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. American Economic Review. 86:741–65.
Peck, S. C. and T. J. Teisberg (1992). CETA: a model for carbon emissions trajectory assessment. Energy Journal. 13:55–77.
Rose, A. (1992). Equity considerations of tradeable carbon entitlements. In: S. Barrett et al.Combating global warming. Geneva: UNCTAD.
Rose, A. and B. Stevens (1993). The efficiency and equity of marketable permits for C02 emissions. Resource and Energy Economics. 15:117–46.
Rose, A. and B. Stevens (1998). A dynamic analysis of fairness in global warming policy: Kyoto, Buenos Aires, and Beyond. Journal of Applied Economics. 1:329–62.
Rose, A., E. Bulte and H. Folmer (1999). Long-run implications of joint implementation for developing countries. Environmental and Resource Ecoomics. (Forthcoming).
Rose, A., B. Stevens, J. Edmonds and M. Wise (1998). International equity and differentiation in global warming policy: an application to tradeable emission permits. Environmental and Resource Economics. 12(1):25–51.
Stevens, B. and A. Rose (1998). A dynamic analysis of the marketable permits approach to global warming policy: a decomposition of sources of advantage. Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Stevens, B., A. Rose and S. Y. Liao (1998). An analysis of the efficiency of marketable permits when benefits are endogenous. Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Tietenberg, T. and D. Victor (1994). Possible administrative structures and procedures for implementing a tradable entitlement approach to controlling global warming. In: T. Tietenberg et al. Combating global warming: possible rules, regulations, and administrative arrangements for a global market in C0 2 emission entitlements. New York: United Nations.
Tol, R. (1995). The damage costs of climate change: towards more comprehensive calculations. Environmental and Resource Economics. 5:353–74.
Van der Mensbrugghe, D. (1995). Regional carbon tax required for equiproportional C0 2 emission reduction from baseline. Paris: OECD.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rose, A., Stevens, B. (2000). A Dynamic Analysis of the Efficiency and Equity of Tradeable Greenhouse Gas Emissions Permits. In: Carraro, C. (eds) Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9484-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9484-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5439-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9484-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive