Skip to main content

A Dynamic Analysis of the Efficiency and Equity of Tradeable Greenhouse Gas Emissions Permits

  • Chapter
Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy

Abstract

In December 1997, 38 industrialized and transitional countries agreed to the Kyoto Protocol, which committed them to targets and timetables to reduce six greenhouse gases (GHGs). In November 1998, in Buenos Aires, at the Fourth Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP-4), efforts were made to improve upon Kyoto by expanding the number of co-operating countries and enhancing the range of policy instruments to implement its objectives. However, COP-4 was a failure, as only two developing countries made commitments, and little progress was made in increasing the flexibility of policy implementation.

Adam Rose is Professor and Head of the Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Brandt Stevens is an Economist with the Demand Analysis Office, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA. The authors wish to thank Shu Yi Liao for his assistance in compiling some of the data and in running the simulations. The views expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the positions of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agarwal, A. and S. Narain (1991). Global warming in an unequal world: a case of environmental colonialism. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1992). Acceptable allocations of tradeable carbon emission entitlements in a global warming treaty. In: S. Barrett et alCombating global warming. Geneva, Switzerland: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S, M. Grubb, K. Roland, A. Rose, R. Sandor and T. Tietenberg (1992). Combating global warming: a global system of tradeable carbon emission entitlements. Geneva, Switzerland: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, H. and S. Peck (1998). Pareto optimal environmental control and income distribution with global climate change. Discussion Paper, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, W. (1992). Economics of global warming. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 3:1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J., M. Wise and D. Barns (1995). Carbon coalitions: the cost and effectiveness of energy agreements to alter trajectories of atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy. 23:309–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyckmans, J, S. Proost and E. Schokkaert (1993). Efficiency and distribution in greenhouse negotiations. Kyklos. 46:363–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser, S. (1994). The social costs of greenhouse gas emissions: an expected value approach. Energy Journal. 15:155–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Framework Convention on Climate Change, Conference of the Parties (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Kyoto, 10 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsnaes, K. (1996). The economics of climate change mitigation in developing countries. Energy Policy. 24:917–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1996). Climate change: economic assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, B. and A. Shah (1994). Global tradable carbon permits, participation incentives and transfers. Oxford Economic Papers. 46:841–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. and R. Richels (1991). Global C02 emission reductions: the impacts of rising energy costs. Energy Journal, 12:87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. and Z. Yang (1996). A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. American Economic Review. 86:741–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, S. C. and T. J. Teisberg (1992). CETA: a model for carbon emissions trajectory assessment. Energy Journal. 13:55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. (1992). Equity considerations of tradeable carbon entitlements. In: S. Barrett et al.Combating global warming. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. and B. Stevens (1993). The efficiency and equity of marketable permits for C02 emissions. Resource and Energy Economics. 15:117–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. and B. Stevens (1998). A dynamic analysis of fairness in global warming policy: Kyoto, Buenos Aires, and Beyond. Journal of Applied Economics. 1:329–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A., E. Bulte and H. Folmer (1999). Long-run implications of joint implementation for developing countries. Environmental and Resource Ecoomics. (Forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A., B. Stevens, J. Edmonds and M. Wise (1998). International equity and differentiation in global warming policy: an application to tradeable emission permits. Environmental and Resource Economics. 12(1):25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B. and A. Rose (1998). A dynamic analysis of the marketable permits approach to global warming policy: a decomposition of sources of advantage. Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B., A. Rose and S. Y. Liao (1998). An analysis of the efficiency of marketable permits when benefits are endogenous. Department of Energy, Environmental, and Mineral Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. and D. Victor (1994). Possible administrative structures and procedures for implementing a tradable entitlement approach to controlling global warming. In: T. Tietenberg et al. Combating global warming: possible rules, regulations, and administrative arrangements for a global market in C0 2 emission entitlements. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. (1995). The damage costs of climate change: towards more comprehensive calculations. Environmental and Resource Economics. 5:353–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Mensbrugghe, D. (1995). Regional carbon tax required for equiproportional C0 2 emission reduction from baseline. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, A., Stevens, B. (2000). A Dynamic Analysis of the Efficiency and Equity of Tradeable Greenhouse Gas Emissions Permits. In: Carraro, C. (eds) Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9484-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9484-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5439-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9484-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics