Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture ((PSCC,volume 7))

  • 115 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter One illuminated a difficult set of political and aesthetic criticisms that could be avoided entirely with a plausible nonperfectionist justification of arts subsidy. The remainder of this book seeks to formulate such an alternative. Rather than claiming a life with art is intrinsically superior to other ways of living, the book argues the arts are instrumentally valuable to what is perhaps our most widely-held public value—democratic self-rule. This chapter lays the groundwork for the larger argument by examining our commitment to democracy. It argues that our commitment to democracy rests on a contingent belief in the value of human autonomy, as well as a belief that democracy is the form of governing that best respects autonomy. The chapter concludes by exploring the extent to which our commitment to democracy implies an obligation to educate future citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Wolff, Robert Paul. In Defense of Anarchism. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson, William. On Justifying Democracy. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Constitutional democracy seeks to avoid this possibility by “placing personal freedoms effectively beyond popular control,” an approach reflected in the American Bill of Rights. However, as unlikely as their repeal may be, the Constitution makes provision for repealing any and all such amendments through (an albeit stringent) process of popular vote. See Gutmann, Amy. “The Disharmony of Democracy,” in Democratic Community, John W. Chapman and Ian Shapiro, eds., New York: New York University Press, 1993, p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. “Moral Disagreement in Democracy,” in Contemporary Political and Social Philosophy. Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge Press Syndicate, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fishkin, James S. Democracy and Deliberation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991, pp. 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dewey, John. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1926, p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwartz, D.T. (2000). The Commitment to Democracy. In: Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9444-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9444-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5450-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9444-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics