Abstract
Contractarian theories come in two basic varieties. On the one hand, political contractarians attempt to explain, understand, and justify the authority of the state and the existence of various political institutions in terms of what it would be rational for agents to agree to in certain specified circumstances. Moral contractarians, on the other hand, attempt to explain, understand, and justify morality itself as the result of a bargain between rational agents in specified circumstances.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Jules Coleman, “Market Contractarianism” in Morals, Markets, and the Law (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1988), ch. 10.
David Gauthier, Morals by Agreement ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1986 ), p. 167.
Ibid., p. 170.
Ibid., p. 172.
Ibid., p. 180.
Ibid., p. 167.
I am indebted to Howard Sobel for bringing this passage to my attention.
Gauthier, op. cit., p. 152.
Ibid., p. 163.
See Jody S. Kraus and Jules L. Coleman, “Morality and the theory of rational choice”, in Peter Vallentyne, ed., Contractarianism and Rational Choice: Essays on David Gauthier’s Morals by Agreement (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 256. and Gauthier “Why Contractarianism?”, in Vallentyne, op. cit., p. 22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bright, B. (2000). The Poverty of Market Contractarianism. In: Narveson, J., Dimock, S. (eds) Liberalism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9440-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9440-0_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5591-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9440-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive