Skip to main content

The Effect of Plant Age on the Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Rice Blast in Arkansas

  • Conference paper
Advances in Rice Blast Research

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant Pathology ((DIPP,volume 15))

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1997 to determine how plant maturity affected the rate and distance of rice blast development from foci. A sulfate non-utilizing (sul) mutant of P.grisea was used as a marked strain that could be distinguished from wild-type (background) inoculum. Plants, 28 or 42 days old, of the susceptible cultivar M204’ were inoculated with P. grisea in the greenhouse. Inoculated plants were then transplanted as foci in the centers of 12.5-m2 plots of M204 which also were either 28 or 45 days old (660 and 1090 degree day thermal units, respectively). Lesion formation was detected three days after transplanting on greenhouse inoculated plants and the focal strength was determined to be 45 lesions / focus in the younger plants and 90 lesions / focus in the older plants. The number of lesions per plant were recorded weekly at distances of 0.3, 1.6, 3.1, 4.7, and 6.3-m from the focal center (0.09-m2). Disease developed rapidly at the focus within 10days in both the younger and older plants (6 and 5 lesions / plant respectively). However, disease spread from foci differed considerably between the different aged plants whereby disease occurred earlier and was more severe in the younger plants. For example, a mean of 15 lesions / plant were observed on the younger plants I.6-m from the foci after 18 days, while only 1 lesion / plant was observed at the same distance in the older plants. After 30days, the mean number of lesions observed on the younger plants at all distances (45, 32, 24, 14 and 12 lesions / plant, respectively) was significantly higher than on the older plants (12, 12, 4, 2, and 0.5 lesions / plant, respectively). The sul mutant was recovered from over 90% of the lesions collected 10 and 40 days after transplanting, indicating inoculum introduced at foci at the beginning ofthe season was responsible for initiating and perpetuating the epidemic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bastiaans, L. 1993. Understanding yield reduction in rice due to leaf blast. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands. Pages 1–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harp, T.L. and Correll, J.C. 1998. Recovery and characterization of spontaneous, selenate-resistant mutants of Magnaporthe grisea,the rice blast pathogen. Mycologia 90, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, R.S. ed. 1990. Rice production handbook. University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service. Misc. Pub. 192. 90 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. H. 1987. Disease dispersal gradients of rice blast from a point source. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 3, 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, C. H., T.H. Barksdale, and M.A. Marchetti. 1984. Rice blast epidemiology. Bulletin 853. The Pennsylvania State University, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station, University Park, Pennsylvania. 33 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, D.H., TeBeest, D.O. and Lee, F.N. 1998. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Disease Progress of Rice Blast on Susceptible and Resistant Cultivars. Plant Disease 83, (Submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnschmidt, H.O., Teng, P.S. Bonman, J.M., and Kranz, J. 19931–4 new assessment key for leaf blast (BI). IRRN 18, 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, H. 1975. Meteorological factors in the epidemiology of rice blast. Ann. Rev. of Phytopathol. 13, 239256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, C.Q. and P.S. Teng. 1993. Path coefficient and regression analysis of the effects of leaf and panicle blast on tropical rice yield. Crop Prot. 12, 296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks, J.C. and Schein, R.D. 1997. Epidemiology and Plant Disease Management, Oxford University Press, New York. 427 pages.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

D. Tharreau M. H. Lebrun N. J. Talbot J. L. Notteghem

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Long, D.H., Te Beest, D.O., Correll, J.C. (2000). The Effect of Plant Age on the Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Rice Blast in Arkansas. In: Tharreau, D., Lebrun, M.H., Talbot, N.J., Notteghem, J.L. (eds) Advances in Rice Blast Research. Developments in Plant Pathology, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9430-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9430-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5436-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9430-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics