Skip to main content

Modeling the Articulatory Dynamics of Two Levels of Stress Contrast

  • Chapter
Prosody: Theory and Experiment

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 14))

Abstract

One of the most intractable problems in the description of utterance prosody is that of understanding speech timing control. Gösta Bruce’s seminal monograph on Swedish word accents in sentence context (Bruce 1977) highlighted an aspect of this problem that is crucially important for the perception of intonational contrasts in many languages — that of modeling what speakers do when they utter a given tune for a sentence and coordinate it with the string of words that constitute its text. By decomposing the tune into independent contributions from word accent, focal phrase accent, and final boundary events, Bruce was able to show that a robust correlate of the contrast between Accent I and Accent II involves a difference in timing, relative to rhythmically critical events in the text, of tonal events that are common to both word accent types. While much work remained to be done (cf. Bruce 1990 and the literature reviewed there), Bruce’s careful attention to prosodic structure, both at the level of lexical contrasts and at the level of focal prominence contrasts for the phrase or utterance as a whole, allowed him to build a phonological model of Swedish intonation contours that could generate precise, testable quantitative predictions. This work was a foundation stone for Pierrehumbert’s later phonological model for English intonation (Pierrehumbert 1980; Liberman and Pierrehumbert 1984; Beckman and Pierrehumbert 1986), a model which produced a synthesis system capable of generating by rule the full range of grammatical intonations. for English (Anderson et al. 1984). Summarizing such developments in intonation synthesis over the last fifteen years, we can say that Bruce’s work on the Swedish model has inspired, directly or indirectly, implementable phonological models of intonation systems for many languages (see reviews in Ladd 1992, 1996; Pierrehumbert, This volume). The English model, in particular, underscores the importance of accurate tonal timing, since there are pairs of accent types that are like the Swedish word accents in contrasting just in tune-text alignment (Pierrehumbert and Steele 1989), and at the same time, there are differences in timing for the same accent type when it is coordinated with rhythmic events at different structural positions in the text (Silverman and Pierrehumbert 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbs, J.H. and Gilbert, B.N. 1973. A strain gauge transducer system for lip and jaw motion in two dimensions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 16, 248–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel, S.M. 1972. Duration discrimination of noise bursts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51, 1219–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M.D., Pierrehumbert, J.B. and Liberman, M.Y. 1984. Synthesis by rule of English intonation patterns. Proc. 1984 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 1, 2.8.1–2. 8. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannert, R. 1982. An FO-dependent model for segment duration? Reports from Uppsala University, Department of Linguistics 8, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. 1986. Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. 1996. When is a syllable not a syllable? In T. Otake and A. Cutler (eds), Phonological Structure and Language Processing: Cross-Linguistic Studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 95–123.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. and Edwards, J. 1994. Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In P.A. Keating (ed) Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M., Edwards, J. and Fletcher, J. 1992. Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics. In Docherty and Ladd (eds), 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. and Hirschberg, J. 1994. The ToBI annotation conventions. Ms. Ohio State University. [Obtain by writing to tobi@ling.ohio-state.edu.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. and Pierrehumbert, J.B. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3, 255–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14, 109–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browman, C.P. and Goldstein, L. 1990. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In J. Kingston and M.E. Beckman (eds), 341–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G. 1977. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund: Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G. 1983. Accentuation and timing in Swedish. Folia Linguistica 17, 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G. 1990. Alignment and composition of tonal accents: comments on Silverman and Pierrehumbert’s paper. In Kingston and Beckman (eds), 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R., Granström, B. and Klatt, D.H. 1979. Some notes on the perception of temporal patterns in speech. Proc. IXth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. II, 260–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, C.H., Umeda, N. and Browman, C. 1973. Automatic synthesis from text. IEEE Transactions on Audio Electroacoustics AU-21, 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creelman, C.D. 1962. Human discrimination of auditory duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34, 582–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, K. 1995a. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, K. 1995b. On status of redundant features: the case of backing and rounding in American English. In B. Connell and A. Arvaniti (eds). Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 61–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, K., Beckman, M.E. and Edwards, J. 1993. The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation. Language and Speech 36, 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denes, P. 1955. Effect of duration on the perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27, 761–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, G.J. and Ladd, D.R. (eds) 1992. Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D.B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27, 765–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D.B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1, 126–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C. and Rietveld, A.C.M. 1992. Intonation contours, prosodic structure and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 20, 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J., Cassidy, S., Fletcher, J. and McVeigh, A. 1993. The mu+ system for corpus based speech research. Computer Speech and Language 7, 305–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J., Fletcher, J. and Beckman, M.E. 1996. Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English. Paper presented at the 5th Conference in Laboratory Phonology, Northwestern University, 6–8 July 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J., Fletcher, J. and Roberts, C. 1995. Coarticulation and the accented unaccented distinction: evidence from jaw movement data. Journal of Phonetics 23, 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. 1978. Vowel duration change and its underlying physiological mechanisms. Language and Speech 21, 354–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, A.S. and Fairbanks, G. 1953. The influence of consonantal environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huss, V. 1978. English word stress in post-nuclear position. Phonetica 35, 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J.A.S., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., Saltzman, E.L. and Kay, B. 1985. A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77, 266–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, R. and Netsell, R. 1971. Effects of stress contrasts on certain articulatory parameters. Phonetica 24, 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, J. and Beckman, M.E. (eds). 1990. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D.H. 1976. Linguistic uses of syllable duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59, 1208–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D.H. 1979. Synthesis by rule of segmental durations in English sentences. In B. Lindblom and S. Öhman (eds) Frontiers of Human Communication Research. New York: Academic Press, 287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, D.P. and Moll, K.L. 1976. A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities. Journal of Phonetics 4, 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D.R. 1992. An introduction to intonational phonology. In Docherty and Ladd (eds), 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D.R. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Laeufer, C. 1992. Patterns of voicing-conditioned vowel duration in French and English. Journal of Phonetics 20, 411–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehiste, 1. 1972. The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51, 2018–2024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehiste, I. 1975. The phonetic structure of paragraphs. In A. Cohen and S. Nooteboom (eds) Structure and Process in Speech Perception. Heidelberg: Springer, 195–203.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W.J.M. 1992. Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations. Cognition 42, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, M. and Pierrehumbert, J. 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff and R. Oerhle (eds) Language Sound Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 157–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, B. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35, 1773–1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, B. 1967. Vowel duration and a model of lip mandible coordination. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report 4 1967, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyberg, B. 1979. Final lengthening–partly a consequence of restrictions on the speed of fundamental frequency change? Journal of Phonetics 7, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatani, L.H. and Aston, C.H. 1978. Acoustic and linguistic factors in stress perception. Ms., Bell Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatani, L.H., O’Conner, K.D. and Aston, C.H. 1981. Prosodic aspects of American speech rhythm. Phonetica 38, 84–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer, S., Munhall, K.G., Kelso, J.A.S., Tuller B. and Harris, K. 1988. Patterns of interarticulator phasing and their relation to linguistic structure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84, 1653–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, S.G. 1973. The perceptual reality of some prosodic durations. Journal of Phonetics 1, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, S., Zetterlund, S., Nordstrand, L. and Engstrand, O. 1979. Predicting segment duration in terms of a gesture theory of speech production. Proc. IXth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 2, 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, J.P. 1977. Rule synthesis of English from diadic units. Proc. 1977 IEEEInternational Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 568–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, D. and Munhall, K. 1985. Control of rate and duration of speech movements.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77, 640–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The Phonetics and Phonology of English Intonation. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J. This volume. Tonal elements and their alignment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J. and Steele, S. 1989. Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica 46 (4), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Port, R.F. 1981. Linguistic timing factors in combination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman, E. 1986. Task dynamic coordination of the speech articulators: a preliminary model. In H. Heuer and C. Fromm (eds) Generation and Modulation of Action Patterns. New York: Springer-Verlag, 129–144.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman, E. and K. Munhall. 1989. A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology 1, 333–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, K.E.A. and Pierrehumbert, J.B. 1990. The timing of prenuclear high accents in English. In Kingston and Beckman (eds), 72–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K.N. and House, A.S. 1963. Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 6, 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, V. 1987. Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: articulatory and acoustic analyses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82, 847–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, V. 1988. F1 structure provides information for final-consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84, 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderslice, R. and Ladefoged, P. 1972. Binary suprasegmental features and transformational word-accentual rules. Language 48, 819–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, C.W. and Ostendorf, M. 1994. Automatic labeling of prosodic patterns. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 469–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beckman, M.E., Cohen, K.B. (2000). Modeling the Articulatory Dynamics of Two Levels of Stress Contrast. In: Horne, M. (eds) Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9413-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9413-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5562-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9413-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics