Skip to main content

Rights and the Presumption of Care

  • Chapter
Rights and Reason

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 44))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

Carl Wellman has done much to clarify our thinking on rights. He helps us understand how, exactly, “Carl has a right to X” should be analyzed, and to see the different kinds of rights there are, such as institutional, especially legal, rights, and moral, including individual and corporate, rights. His topology is surely useful, though it can be challenged. And his arguments for the clarification that can be achieved by employing the Hohfeldian model of claims, liberties, powers, and immunities for the rights in question can benefit all of us who deal with moral issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba: 1965, Civic Culture. Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Brian: 1995, Justice as Impartiality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, Harry: 1998, “Civic Education and Liberal Legitimacy,” Ethics, 108, pp. 719–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, Claudia (ed.): 1991, Feminist Ethics. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daggar, Richard: 1997, Civic Virtues. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, Alexis: 1955, Democracy in America. (12th edn), Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John: 1916, Democracy in Education. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John: 1963, Experience and Education. Collier Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Marilyn: 1993, What Are Friends For? Feminist Perspectives On Personal Relationships And Moral Theory. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, William: 1992, Liberal Purposes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol: 1982, In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, Amy: 1987, Democratic Education. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia: 1999a, forthcoming, “Caring Relations and Principles of Justice,” in James Sterba (ed.), Controversies in Feminism. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia: 1999b, forthcoming, “Feminist Ethical Theory,” in Klaus Brinkmann (ed.), The Paideia Project: Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia: 1993, Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia: 1995–1996, “Justice and Utility: Who Cares?” Philosophical Exchange, SUNY Brockport, NY: Center for Philosophical Exchange, pp. 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia: 1999c, forthcoming, “Liberalism and the Ethics of Care,” in Claudia Card (ed.), On Feminist Ethics and Politics. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia: 1984, Rights and Goods. Justifying Social Action. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia (ed.): 1995, Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, Alison: 1991, “Feminist Ethics: Projects, Problems, Prospects,” in Claudia Card (ed.), Feminist Ethics. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Jean: 1997, “Autonomy, Relationality, and Feminist Ethics,” Hypatia, 12(2), pp. 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, Robert: 1998, Everything For Sale. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will: 1989, Liberalism, Community and Culture. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will and Wayne Norman: 1994, “Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory,” Ethics, 104, pp. 352–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, Stephen: 1995, “Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls?” Ethics, 108, pp. 468–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Diana T.: 1989, Self, Society, and Personal Choice. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Diana T. (ed.): 1997, Feminists Rethink The Self. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel: 1984, Caring: A Feminine Approach To Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C: 1997, “The Feminist Critique of Liberalism,” The Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, Susan Moller: 1998, “Feminism and Multiculturalism: Some Tensions,” Ethics, pp. 108, 661–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okin, Susan Moller: 1989, Justice, Gender, and the Family. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D.: 1994, Making Democracy Work. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D.: 1996, “The Strange Disappearance of Civic America,” The American Prospect, 24(Winter), pp. 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Fiona: 1999, Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tester, Keith: 1992, Civil Society. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan C: 1996, “Care as a Political Concept,” in Nancy J. Hirschmann and Christine Di Stefano (eds.), Revisioning the Political. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan C: 1993, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, Carl: 1985, A Theory of Rights. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard: 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Held, V. (2000). Rights and the Presumption of Care. In: Friedman, M., May, L., Parsons, K., Stiff, J. (eds) Rights and Reason. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9403-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9403-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5408-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9403-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics