Skip to main content

Why did Gottlob Frege and Ernst Schröder Fail in their Attempts to Persuade German Philosophers of the Virtues of Mathematical Logic?

  • Chapter
The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge

Part of the book series: The New Synthese Historical Library ((SYNL,volume 48))

  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

Gottlob Frege (1848–1925) is well known to everyone interested in logic and philosophy, and his Begriffsschrift (1879) is considered the work which began the era of modern mathematical logic. Ernst Schröder (1841–1902) is in turn best remembered for his monumental Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik (1890–1905) which is the culmination of the Boolean tradition in the algebra of logic. Although Schröder and Frege were mathematicians writing primarily for a mathematical audience, they both attempted to reach philosophers as well. Schröder explicitly addressed his writings to both mathematicians and philosophers (1877, p. v; 1890, p. vi). Frege published most of his papers in philosophical journals and wished that logicians would accept his innovations (1879, p. xiii). Yet, despite their efforts to attract the attention of contemporary German philosophers, both Frege and Schröder remained isolated figures whose writings were either strongly criticized or completely neglected. Schröder managed to generate some interest in his ideas, but Frege’s influence remained very limited for a long time. Frege’s ideas began eventually to have an impact in Germany through Russell’s The Principles of Mathematics (1903).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boole, G. (1954). An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. New York: Dover Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, T. (1972). On the Life and Work of Gottlob Frege. In: Frege (1972), pp. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1963). Intellectual Autobiography. In: P. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, pp. 3–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipert, R. (1980). Ein Karlsruher Pioneer der Logik. Ernst Schröders Beitrag zur Logik und zu den Grundlagen der Mathematik. Fridericiana H. 27, pp. 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Reprinted in: G. Frege (1964). Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze. Hildesheim: G. Olms. An English translation in: Frege (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1894). Rezension von: E.G. Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik I. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 103, pp. 313–332. An English translation in: Frege (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1906). Antwort auf die Ferienplauderei des Herrn Thomae. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 15, pp. 586–590. An English translation in: Frege (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1971). On the Foundations of Geometry and Formal Theories of Arithmetic. Translated and edited by E.-H. Kluge. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. Translated by T. W. Bynum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1974). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik / The Foundations of Arithmetik. Reprinted and translated by J. L. Austin, 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1980). Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Abridged for the English edition by Brian McGuiness and translated by Hans Kaal. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1983). Nachgelassene Schriften. Edited by Hans Hermes, Friedrich Kambartel, and Friedrich Kaulbach. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1984). Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. Edited by Brian McGuinness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, S. (1879). Rezension von Schröder, Der Operationskreis des Logikkalküls. Vierteljahrsschriftfür wissenschaftliche Philosophie 3, pp. 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamacher-Hermes, A. (1994). Inhalts- oder Umfangslogik? Die Kontroverse zwischen E. Husserl und A. Voigt. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, J. (1994). Styles of Scientific Thought. The German Genetics Community 1900–1933. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, R. (1879). Rezension von Frege: Be griffs schrift. Archiv der Mathematik und Physik 63, Litterarischer Bericht 252, pp. 44–45. An English translation in: Frege (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1891a). Rezension von Schröder, Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik. Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen, pp. 243–278. An English translation in: Husserl (1994b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1891b). Der Folgerungscalcul und die Inhaltslogik. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 15, pp. 168–189. An English translation in: Husserl (1994b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1893). A. Voigts ‘Elementary’ Logik und meine Darlegungen zur Logik des Logischen Kalküls. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 17, pp. 111–120. An English translation in: Husserl (1994b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). Logical Investigations. An English translation of the second edition by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1994a). Briefwechsel, Band 5: Die Neukantianer. Edited by Karl Schumann. Dordrect, Boston and London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E. (1994b). Collected Works, vol. 5: Early writings in the philosophy of logic and mathematics. Translated by Dallas Willard and edited by Rudolf Bernet. Dordrect, Boston and London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. S. (1864). Pure Logic or the logic of quality apart from quantity. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. S. (1879). The Principles of Science, a Treatise on Logic and Scientific Method. 3rd edition. London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jourdain, P.E.B. (1911). The philosophy of Mr. Bertrand Russell. The Monist 21, pp. 481–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M. (1995). Psychologism, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswitz, K. (1879). Rezension von Frege: Begriffsschrift. Jenaer Literaturzeitung 6, pp. 248–249. An English translation in: Frege (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, H. (1880). Logik: Drei Bücher vom Denken, vom Untersuchungen und vom Erkennen. 2nd edition. Leipzig: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, C. (1980). State, Society, and University in Germany 1700–1914. Cambridge, London and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaëlis, C.T. (1880). Rezension von Frege, Begriffsschrift. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 12, pp. 232–240. An English translation in: Frege (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oettingen, A. J. von (ed.) (1904). J. C. Poggendorff s biographisch-literarisches Handwörterbuch zu den exacten Wissenschaften. Leipzig: Verlag von J. A. Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckhaus, V. (1988). Brilliant young lady-mathematician. Ernst Schröders Urteil über Christine Ladd-Franklin. Arbeitsberichte aus dem DFG-Projekt Fallstudien zur Begründung einer Sozialgeschichte der Logik 16, pp. 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckhaus, V. (1990). Hilbertprogram und Kritische Philosophie. Das Göttinger Modell interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit zwischen Mathematik und Philosophie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer, F. (1969). The Decline of German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1890–1933. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1967). The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell 1872–1914. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, H. (1880). Die Naturgesetze und ihr Zusammenhang mit den Prinzipien der abstracten Wissenschaften. Dritter Teil: Die Theorie der Erkenntnis oder die logischen Gesetze. Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, S.F.V. (1893). Rezension von Schröder, Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik, vol. 1. Jahrbuch über die Fortschritte der Mathematik 22, pp. 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz-Dumont, O. (1878). Die mathematischen Elemente der Erkenntnistheorie. Berlin: Carl Duncker’s Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, E. (1877). Der Operationskreis des Logikkalkuls. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, E. (1880). Rezension von Frege, Begriffsschrift. Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, Hist.-literarische Abt. 25, pp. 81–94. An English translation in: Frege (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, E. (1890). Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik (exacte Logik), 1. Band. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, E. (1899). On Pasigraphy: Its Present State and the Pasigraphic Movement in Italy. The Monist 9, pp. 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. & S. Schaffer (1985). Leviathan and the Airpump, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigwart, C. (1873). Logik, Erster Band: Die Lehre vom Unheil, vom Begriff und vom Schluss. Tübingen: Verlag der H. Laupp’sehen Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, H. (1980). Gottlob Frege. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomae, J. (1906). Gedankenloser Denker, eine Ferienplauderei. Jahresberichte der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 15, pp. 434–438. An English translation in: Frege (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomae, J. (1906). Erklärung. Jahresberichte der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 15, pp. 590–591. An English translation in: Frege (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J. (1881). Symbolic Logic. London: MacMillan & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pulkkinen, J. (2000). Why did Gottlob Frege and Ernst Schröder Fail in their Attempts to Persuade German Philosophers of the Virtues of Mathematical Logic?. In: Kusch, M. (eds) The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. The New Synthese Historical Library, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9399-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9399-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5390-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9399-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics