Abstract
Context modelling and its influence on the linguistic structure of texts has been the object of much research, especially within functional theories of language [Halliday, 1978; Kress and Threadgold, 1988; Lemke, 1988; Fairclough, 1989]. In these theories the issue is how broadly the concept of context is defined. For earlier functional linguists, it referred basically to the linguistic context, whereas for some contemporary theorists who operate within a much broader social semiotics, context needs to be more discursively understood as a multi-levelled phenomenon, and ‘text’ as the product of varying contextual levels and components. In general, researchers have recognized at least three levels of context—cultural, situational and textual—each one consisting of different components and variables, with variations in the schemes of classifications, and in interpretations of the significance of the concepts.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
I. Bäcklund. Theme in English telephone conversation. Paper delivered at the 17th International Systemic Congress, Stirling, Scotland, June 1990.
M. Berry. Thematic options and success in writing. In Language and Literature-Theory and Practice: A Tribute to Walter Grauberg. C. Butler, R. and J. Cardwell, eds. University of Nottingham, 1989.
N. E. Enkvist. Text strategies: single, dual, multiple. In Language topics: essays in honour of Michael Halliday. Vol.II. R. Steele and Threadgold, eds. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1987.
N. E. Enkvist. More about text strategies. In Perspectives on Language Performance. Studies in Linguistics, Literary Criticism and Language Teaching and Learning, W. Lörscher and R. Schulze, eds. Günter Narr, Tübingen, 1987.
N. Fairclough. Language and Power. Longman, London, 1989.
Firbas, 1992] J. Firbas. On some basic problems of Functional Sentence Perspective. In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice. M. Davies and L. Ravelli, eds. Pinter, London, 1992.
G. Francis. Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse, Word, 40, 20 1221, 1989.
G. Francis. Theme in the daily press. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 4, 51–87, 1990.
P. H. Fries. On the status of theme in English: arguments from discourse. In Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts. Petöfi and Sozer, eds. Buske Verlag, Hamburg, 1981.
P. H. Fries. A personal view of theme. In Thematic development in texts, M. Ghadessy, ed. pp. 1–19, Pinter, London, 1995.
M. Ghadessy. Thematic development and its relationship to register and genres. In Thematic Development in Texts, M. Ghadessy, ed. pp. 129–146. Pinter, London, 1995.
T. Givon. Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction. Volume 1. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1984.
J. E. Grimes. The Thread of Discourse. Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 207. Mouton, The Hague and Paris, 1975.
M. A. K. Halliday. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Journal of Linguistics, 3, 37–81, 1967
M. A. K. Halliday. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Meaning. Edward Arnold, London, 1978
M. A. K. Halliday. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London, 1985.
Hovy et al.,1993] E. Hovy, J. Lavid, V. Mittal and C. Paris. Employing knowledge resources in a new text planner architecture. In Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation,R. Dale, E.Hovy, D. Röstner, and O. Stock, eds. pp. 57–72. Springer, 1993.
D. Hymes. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: an Ethnographic Approach. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1974.
G. Kress and T. Threadgold. Towards a social theory of genre. Southern Review, 21, 215–243, 1988.
J. Lavid. Theme, Discourse Topic and Information Structuring. Deliverable R1.2.2b of WP1.2.2. Esprit Basic Research Project 6665 DANDELION, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, October 1994.
J. Lavid. The relevance of corpus-based research for contrastive linguistic and computational studies: thematization as an example. In Corpora in Semantic and Pragmatic Research. pp. 117–139. Publicaciones del Instituto de Lingüfstica Aplicada. Barcelona: Universidad Pompeu Fabra, 1998.
Lavid et al.,1999] J. Lavid, W. Ramm and C. Villiger. Thematization in English and in German: empirical and computational findings. Submitted for publication.
H. Leckie-Tarry. Language and Context: A Functional Linguistic Theory ofRegister. Pinter, London and New York, 1995.
J. L. Lemke. Text structure and Text Semantics. In Pragmatics, Discourse and Texts: Some Systemically-inspired Approaches, Steiner and Veltman, eds. Pinter, London, 1988.
R. E. Longacre. The Grammar of Discourse. Plenum Press, New York and London, 1983.
W. C. Mann. An overview of the the Penman text generation system. Technical Report SI/ RR-83–114, USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA, 1983.
J. R. Martin. More than what the message is about: English Theme. In Thematic Development in Texts, M. Ghadessy, ed. pp. 23–258. Pinter, London, 1995.
C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. International Language Sciences Publishers, Tokyo, 1995.
C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and J. Bateman. Text Generation and Systemic-Functional Linguistics: Experiences from English and Japanese, Pinter, London, 1991.
W. Nash. Designs in Prose. Longman, London, 1980.
Ramm et al.,1995] W. Ramm, A. Rothkegel, E. Steiner and C. Villiger. Discourse Grammar for German. Deliverable R2.3.2 of WP 2 Grammar Integration,ESPRIT Basic Research Project 6665 DANDELION, University of Saarland, Saarbrcken, 1995
D. L. Rubin. The influence of communicative context on stylistic variation in writing. In The Development of Oral and Written Language in Social Contexts, Pelligrini and Yawkey, eds. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1984.
Teich et al.,forthcoming] E. Teich, J. Bateman and L. Degand. (forthcoming). Multilingual textuality: experiences from multilingual text generation. In Selected Papers from the Fourth European Workshop on Natural Language Generation,Pisa, Italy, M. Zock and G. Adorni, eds.. Springer, Berlin, forthcoming.
T. Virtanen. Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English. Abo Akademi University Press, 1992
E. Werlich. A Text Grammar of English. Quelle and Meyer, Heidelberg, 1983.
L. Wang. Analysis of thematic variations in Buried Child. Paper delivered at the First Biennial Conference on Discourse. Hangzhou Peoples Republic of China, June 1991.
S. P. Witte and R. D. Cherry. Writing processes and written products in composition research. In Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. Written Communication Manual 1, C. R. Cooper and S. Greenbaum, eds. Sage, Beverly Hills, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lavid, J. (2000). Contextual Constraints on Thematization in Written Discourse: An Empirical Study. In: Bonzon, P., Cavalcanti, M., Nossum, R. (eds) Formal Aspects of Context. Applied Logic Series, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9397-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9397-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5472-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9397-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive