Skip to main content

Requirements for Dialogue Context Modelling

  • Chapter
Formal Aspects of Context

Part of the book series: Applied Logic Series ((APLS,volume 20))

  • 210 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is concerned with context in relation to language understanding, focusing on the interactive use of language in dialogues. Language understanding in general requires contextual information in order to assign appropriate meanings to linguistic expressions; the understanding of utterances in dialogue involves context in an additional, more fundamental way, in that it requires us to relate utterances to their causes and intended effects. In other words, for language used in interaction, the very notions of understanding and utterance meaning should be defined in terms of context properties and how they change through communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn et al.,1994] R. Ahn, R. J. Beun, T. Borghuis, H. C. Bunt and C. van Overveld. The DENK architecture: a fundamental approach to user interfaces. Artificial Intelligence Review,8, 431–445, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Alexandersson. Some ideas for the automatic acquisition of dialogue structure. In Proc. 11th Twente Workshop on Language Technology. Enschede: University of Twente, pp. 149–158, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. J. Beun. The recognition of declarative questions in information dialogues. PhD Thesis, Tilburg University, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. Beun. Speech act generation in cooperative dialogue. In Proc. 11th Twente Workshop on Language Technology. Enschede: University of Twente, pp. 71–79, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Bilange. Modélisation du dialogue oral personne-machine par une approche structurelle: theorie et réalisation. PhD Thesis, Rennes I University, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bratman et al.,1988] M. E. Bratman, D. J. Israel and M. E. Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence,4, 349–355, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. C. Bunt. Information Dialogues as Communicative Actions in Relation to User Modelling and Information Processing. In The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue. M. M. Taylor, F. Néel and D. G. Bouwhuis, eds. pp. 47–73. North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. C. Bunt. Context and Dialogue Control. THINK Quarterly, 3, 19–31, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. C. Bunt. Semantics and pragmatics in the DELTA dialogue system. In Proc. of the2nd Spoken Dialogue and Discourse Workshop. L. Dybkjaer, ed. pp. 1–27, Roskilde University, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bunt, 1996] H. C. Bunt. Dynamic Interpretation and Dialogue Theory. In The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue, Vol. 2., M. M. Taylor, E. Néel and D. G. Bouwhuis, eds. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. C. Bunt. Iterative context specification and dialogue analysis. In Abduction, Belief and Context: Studies in Computational Pragmatics. H. C. Bunt and W. J. Black, eds. pp. 73–129. University College Press, London, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bunt et al.,1984] H. C. Bunt, R. J. Beun, Dols, J. van der Linden and G. Schwartzenberg. The TEN- DUM dialogue system and its theoretical basis. IPO Annual Progress Report,19, 105–113, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. C. Bunt and K. van der Sloot. Parsing as dynamic interpretation of feature structures. In Recent Advances in Parsing Technology. H. Bunt and M. Tomita, eds. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, 1996.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Bunt et al.,1998a] H. C. Bunt, R. Ahn, L. Kievit, P. Piwek, M. Verlinden, R. J. Beun, and C. van Overveld. Multimodal Cooperation with the DENK System. In Multimodal Human-Computer Communication: Systems, Techniques and Experiments. H. C. Bunt, R. J. Beun and T. Borghuis, eds. pp. 39–67. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1374, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bunt et al.,1998b] H. C. Bunt, L. Kievit, P. Piwek, M. Verlinden, R. J. Beun, T. Borghuis and C. van Overveld. Cooperative dialogue with the multimodal DENK system. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conference of Cooperative Multimodal Communication CMC/98. H. C. Bunt, R. J. Beun, T. Borghuis, L. Kievit and M. Verlinden, eds. SOBU, Tilburg University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. J. Grosz and C. L. Sidner. Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175–204, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Kamp and U. Reyle. From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Kievit. Context-driven natural language interpretation. PhD Thesis, Tilburg University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Maier. A multi-dimensional representation of context in a speech translation system. In Proc. IJCAI’95 Workshop on Context in Natural Language Processing, L. Iwanka and W. Zadrozny, eds. pp. 78–85, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Maier. Context construction as a subtask of dialogue processing–the Verbmobil case. In Proc. 11th Twente Workshop on Language Technology. pp. 113–122. University of Twente, Enschede, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Moeschler. Argumentation et conversation, éléments pour une analyse pragmatique du discours. Hatier, Paris, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Piwek. Logic, Information and Conversation. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. Prince and D. Pemel. Several knowledge models and a blackboard memory for human-machine robust dialogues. Natural Language Engineering, 1, 113–145, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rats, 1996 ] M. Rats. Topic management in information dialogues. PhD Thesis, Tilburg University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Rats and H. C. Bunt. Information Packaging in Dutch Information Dialogues. In Proc. 3rd Spoken Dialogue and Discourse Workshop. L. Dybkjaer, ed. pp. 52–73. Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute for Production Technology, Odense, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Roulet. L’articulation du discours en francais contemporain. Peter Lang, Bern, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. R. Searle Speech Act Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. R. Traum. The TRAINS-93 Dialogue Manager. In Proc. 11th Twente Workshop on Language Technology, pp. 1–11. University of Twente, Enschede, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vilant et al.,1994] A. Vilnat, B. Grau and G. Sabah) Control in man-machine dialogue. THINK, 3,32–55, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bunt, H. (2000). Requirements for Dialogue Context Modelling. In: Bonzon, P., Cavalcanti, M., Nossum, R. (eds) Formal Aspects of Context. Applied Logic Series, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9397-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9397-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5472-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9397-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics