Skip to main content

The Present Version of Constructive Type Theory (1995)

  • Chapter
History and Philosophy of Constructive Type Theory

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 290))

  • 227 Accesses

Abstract

What is here being called the present version of constructive type theory is a synthesis and elaboration of the versions (7) and (8) of constructive type theory. This chapter sets out with preliminaries which are philosophical methodological guidelines underlying the organization and presentation of the present version of constructive type theory. The following two sections discuss the non-dependent types and objects as well as the dependent types and objects resp. The third section moreover explains, how to construct new types and objects from given ones, where the former will be called function types and the latter function objects. These sections define a whole type structure, but nothing has been said so far about what types there are. The sixth and seventh sections introduce two ground types, namely the ground type of sets and the ground type of propositions resp. And the ‘application’ of the just mentioned type structure to the ground type of sets yields in the ninth section constructive set theory, while the ‘application’ of the same type structure to the ground type of propositions yields in the tenth section constructive logic. The eleventh section reveals that the theories of these two ground types, i.e. constructive set theory and constructive logic, not only share the same (type-) structural features, but they also have other essential features in common which allow to establish a precise correspondence (often called isomorphism) between sets and propositions. The twelfth and last section introduces the sequents and shows that there is a precise correspondence (that can also be called isomorphism) between types and sequents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dubislav (1931), pp. 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Curry (1977), Chapter 3, Sect. C, or Curry and Feys (1958), Chapt. 2, Sect. E.

    Google Scholar 

  3. To see how Curry inspired the conception of def. identity in constructive type theory, cf. Sect. viii. of this chapter.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Solomon (1970). pp. 398–401.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scholz (1930), pp. 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. In his (1983A), p. 235, he advocates this order (for the first time) for all the concepts or notions to be really defined in that paper. In his (1990), p. 141, he appears to generalize this statement to include all concepts whatsoever.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. Dummett (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S Patzig (1973), pp. 61,62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. p. 76; in the same direction cf. Frede (1987). lhe bulk ot rredes and Patzig’s papers is critical in the sense of a discussion and critique of earlier interpretations of Artistotle’s categories, and the positive attempt at an interpretation of their own is tentative and fragmentary.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 0 Cf. Körner (1955), Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. Bar-Hillel (1957) and Thompson (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quine (1969), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. l8 p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gottlieb (1979), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20p84

    Google Scholar 

  21. p92

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geach (1967, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Griffin (1977), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. pp. 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  25. pp. 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26p.21.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cf. also Stegmüller (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cf. Def. 5.1 in Thompson (1991), p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Apart from Leibniz, the following quotes are taken from Rüthing (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pfeiffer and Dahan-Dalmedico (1986), pp. 217–218, and also Chapt. 6, §§7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rüthing (1984), p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cf. also Martin-Löf (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cf. Hatcher (1982), Chapter 4, Sect. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cf. de Bruijn (1970, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Curry and Feys (1958), cf. Introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  36. This whole section is based on Tasistro (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tasistro (1993), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  38. For the details, cf. pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  39. p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  40. p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cf. pp. 14–16. For the details of these justifications, cf. pp. 20, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  43. p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  44. p. 22

    Google Scholar 

  45. p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46pp. 25, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  47. pp. 25, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  48. p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  49. For details, cf. p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  50. p. 26/7.

    Google Scholar 

  51. p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  52. P. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53p 27

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bochenski (1970), §40.

    Google Scholar 

  55. The following quotes are taken from Hallett (1984), pp. 33, 34, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Parsons (1967), p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cf. van Dalen et al. (1978), Chapter 2, Sect. 4. For an informal account, cf. Boolos (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Van Dalen et al. (1978), Chapter 1, Sect. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Aczel (1978), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  60. pp. 61, 62.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cf. Hatcher (1982), Chapter 4, Sect. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hatcher (1982), p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cf. also Jacobs (1989), pp. 402, 403.

    Google Scholar 

  64. p. 404.

    Google Scholar 

  65. This note (1) makes use of Sundholm (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Cf. e.g. Quine (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Berg (1962), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Cf. Martin-Löf’s examples in version (7), pp. 25, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dummett (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  70. For these notes, cf. Thompson (1991), pp. 68, 74.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Cf. Nordström et al. (1990), pp. 103, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  72. For details, cf. version (6), pp. 74ff.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Cf. Nordström et al. (1990), pp. 72,73.

    Google Scholar 

  74. For an example, cf. Nordström et al. (1990), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Cf. Nordström et al. (1990), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  76. p.66.

    Google Scholar 

  77. p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  78. pp. 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Cf. p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  80. p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Aczel (1978), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Cf. Nordström et al. (1990), pp. 100, 101.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Cf. Jacobs (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Cf. Schroeder-Heister (1984, 1984A).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Cf. for these distinctions Troelstra and van Dalen (1988), pp. 189, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Bishop (1967), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Swaen (1989), esp. pp. 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Frege (1893), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Cf. Nordström et al. (1990), pp. 84, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Swaen (1989), pp. 65, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  91. For an example cf. version (7), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sommaruga, G. (2000). The Present Version of Constructive Type Theory (1995). In: History and Philosophy of Constructive Type Theory. Synthese Library, vol 290. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9393-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9393-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5403-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9393-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics