Skip to main content

Individualistic and Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
The Reality of the Unobservable

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 215))

  • 337 Accesses

The quantum mechanical formalism which was discovered by Heisenberg1 and Schrödinger2 in 1925 was first interpreted by Born3 in a statistical sense. The formal expressions p(φ,a i )=|(φ,φa i |2, i∈N were interpreted as the probabilities that a quantum system S with preparation φ possesses the value a i which belongs to the state φa i . This original Born-interpretation which was formulated for scattering processes was, however, not tenable in the general case. The probabilities must not be related to the system S in state φ since in the preparation φ the value a i of an observable A is in general not subjectively unknown but objectively undecided. Instead, one has to interpret the formal terms p(φ, a i ) as the probabilities for finding the value a i . after the measurement of the observable A of the system S with preparation φ. In this improved version, the statistical or “Born interpretation” is used in present day literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • M. Born, “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge”, Zeitschriflßr Physik, 37 , 1926, 863–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Busch, P. Latiti and P. Mittelstaedt, The Quantum Theory of Measurement, Springer, Heidelberg 1991,2nd ed. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be considered complete?”, Phys. Rev, 32 ,1935,777–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Everett, The Theory of the Universal Wave Function. Theses. Princeton University, 1957. Reprinted in B.S. DeWitt

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Graham eds., The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.Y. 1973, 1–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Finkelstein, “The Logic of Quantum Physics”, Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 25 , 1962, 621–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Giere, “Objective Single-Case Probabilities”, in P. Suppes ed. et al. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 1973,457–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Graham, “The Measurement of Relative Frequency”, in B.S. De Witt and N. Graham eds., The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.Y. 1973, 229–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Hartle, “Quantum Mechanics of Individual Systems”, Am. J. of Phys. 36 , 1968,704–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.Heisenberg, “Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen”, Zeitschrif für Physik 33, 1925, 879–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Heisenberg, “Die Plancksche Entdeckung und die physikalischen Probleme der Atomphysik”, Universitas 14 , 1959, 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • P Mittelstaedt, “The Measuring Process and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, Intern. Journ. of Theor. Phys. 32 , 1993, 1763–1775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Popper, “The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability and the Quantum Theory”, in S. Körner ed., Observation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics, Butterworth, London 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Popper, Quantum Theory and the Schism of Physics, Postscript III to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, 1982. W.W. Bartley Illrd ed. Hutchinson, London, Melbourne 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Schneider, “Two Interpretations of Objective Probabilities”, Philosophia Naturalismi, 1994, 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Schrödinger, “Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem”, Annalen der Physik 79 , 1926,361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Sklar, “Is Probability a Dispositional Property?”, The Journal of Philosophy 67 ,1970,355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.S. De Witt, “The Many-Universes Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, IL Corso, Academic Press, New York 1971, 167–218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mittelstaedt, P. (2000). Individualistic and Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Agazzi, E., Pauri, M. (eds) The Reality of the Unobservable. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 215. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9391-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9391-5_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5458-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9391-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics