Abstract
Medical concepts, such as health, illness and disease, have been the focus of studies in the disciplines of anthropology, sociology and philosophy for a number of decades. There has been debate concerning mainly the respective merits of a medical view of these concepts, stressing the biological basis, and a sociological/anthropological view, which emphasises their dependence on the cultural and social context in which they are used. Most debaters, in particular the representatives of the social sciences, have sided with the sociological interpretation of these concepts. In the philosophical arena, on the other hand, quite different theories have been proposed; a forceful analysis essentially defending the medical view has been given by C. Boorse [9], [10] and [11], whilst many equally forceful criticisms of this view have been presented by a number of later theorists (for instance G.J. Agich [1], H.T. Engelhardt [28], K.W.M. Fulford [30] and myself [71]; for a recent response by Boorse, see [12]).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nordenfelt, L. (2000). On the Notion of Health as Ability. In: Action, Ability and Health. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9361-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9361-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5412-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9361-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive