Skip to main content

Subcontracting military power: The privatisation of security in contemporary Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Chapter
Under the Counter and over the Border

Abstract

This article seeks to establish a clear difference between the classical view of mercenaries as hired guns and the more recent, business oriented, phenomenon of private security companies. The limitations of the definitions currently used in international law will be explored and their impact on the control of private military forces assessed. The article will then go on to identify the particular circumstances existing in Africa that provide such a fertile environment for the operation of private security companies. The activities of Executive Outcomes and Sandline International Ltd will be used as case studies, particularly their operations in Sierra Leone. Their corporate connections will be highlighted, especially their links to mineral extraction companies, and how these are used to finance their operations by the host countries. Finally, recent attempts to legislate to control the activities of these companies are examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Of the recent literature, the most useful general overviews are: Thomas K. Adams, “The New Mercenaries and the Privatization of Conflict”, Parameters (US Army War College Quarterly) Summer 1999. Accessible at; http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usawc/parameters/99/sum mer/adams.htm; David Isenberg, “Soldiers of Fortune Ltd: A Profile of Today’s Private Sector Corporate Mercenary Firms”, paper for the Center for Defense Information, Washington, DC, November 1997, accessible at: http://www.cdi.org; David Shearer, “Private Armies and Military Intervention”, Adelphi Paper 316 (Oxford, Oxford University Press/International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1998).

  2. Shearer, “Private Armies”, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adams, “the New Mercenaries”, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Enrique Ballesteros, United Nations Special Rapporteur, “Report on the question of the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination”, United Nations Document E/CN.4/1998/31, 27.1.98, paras 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Britain still recruits for the Royal Gurkha Rifles in Nepal and many nationalities are to be found within the ranks of the French Foreign Legion.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Foreign Legion has been heavily involved in many of France’s military interventions in Africa, particularly in Chad and more recently in Rwanda in 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shearer, “Private Armies”, p. 15. See also Peter Tickler, The Modern Mercenary: Dog of War or Soldier of Honour? (Wellingborough, Patrick Stephens Ltd, 1987), and Mike Hoare, Congo Mercenary (London, Robert Hale Ltd, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 32 Battalion was largely made up of Angolans led by South African officers and NCOs.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Roy May and Arnold Hughes, “Armies on loan: Toward an explanation of transna-tional military intervention among Black African states”, in S. Baynham (ed.), Military Power & Politics in Black Africa (London, Croom Helm, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. “Des ex-gendarmes de l’Elysée participeraient au recrutement de mercenaires pour le Zaire”, Le Monde, 8.1.97; “Mercenaries bark but don’t bite”, New African, April 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adams, “The New Mercenaries”, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See MPRI’s website a http://www.mpri.com

  14. Rhys Dogan and Michael Pugh, From Military to Market Imperatives: Peacekeeping and the New Public Policy, paper presented at the British International Studies Association Conference, University of Durham, 17–18.12.96.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See S.Decalo, “The Process, Prospects and Constraints of Démocratisation in Africa”, African Affairs 1992, p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Eastern Europe’s Arsenal on the Loose: Managing Light Weapons Flows to Conflict Zones”, BASIC occasional paper, 26.5.98. Accessible http://www.bacisint.org. See also, Al Venter, “Arms into Africa”, New African, January 1999.

  17. See Roy May and Gerry Cleaver, “African peacekeeping: Still dependent?”, International Peacekeeping Summer 1997, 4(2): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See, Gerry Cleaver and Roy May, “Peacekeeping: The African Dimension”, Review of African Political Economy, Dec. 1995, 22(66): 485–497; Gerry Cleaver and Roy May, “African Perspectives: Regional Peacekeeping”, in Roy May and Oliver Furley (eds.), Peacekeeping in Africa (Aldershot, Ashgate, 1999), pp. 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Roy May and Gerry Cleaver, “African peacekeeping: Still dependent?” ; Gerry Cleaver, “The African Crisis Response Initiative”, paper presented at the biennial conference of the African Studies Association of the UK, University of London 14–16.9.98.

    Google Scholar 

  22. West Africa, 28.7–3.8.97, p. 1196 and p. 1199; “Gabon, France discuss military bases”, Pan African News Agency 30.7.97.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shearer, “Private Armies”, p. 41. See also, Isenberg, “Soldiers of Fortune Ltd.”; “Africa’s new enforcers”, The Independent, 16.9.96; “Corporate dogs of war who grow fat amid the anarchy of Africa”, The Observer, 19.1.97.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Unlike the other units mentioned, Koevoet was a highly effective counter-insurgency unit of the South West Africa Police. See Helmoed-Roemer Heithman and Paul Hannon, Modern African Wars 3: South West Africa (Osprey Men at Arms, No. 242, London, Osprey Publishing, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Shearer, “Private Armies”, and Isenberg, “Soldiers of Fortune Ltd.”

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shearer, “Private Armies”, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Isenberg, “Soldiers of Fortune Ltd.”

    Google Scholar 

  28. Alfred B. Zack-Williams, “Dimensions on West African Conflicts”, paper presented at the AS AUK Symposium “Vulnerabilities”, Coventry University, 16.9.99.

    Google Scholar 

  29. David J. Francis, “Mercenary Intervention in Sierra Leone: Providing National Security or International Exploitation?”, Third World Quarterly 1999, 20(2): 319–338, 326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peta Thorneycroft, “Mobutu couldn’t afford South African mercenaries”, Weekly Mail & Guardian 18.7.99 http://www.sn.apc.organisation/wmail

  31. See Adams, “The New Mercenaries”. Also, Sophie Pons, “Executive Outcomes to close on its own terms,” Daily Mail & Guardian, 11.12.99, http://www.mg.com.za

  32. See, Select Committee on Foreign Affairs, Sierra Leone, 2nd Report Session 1998–99, HC-116, http://www.parliament.the-statiooffice.co.uk/pa/cml99899/cmsel

  33. See Isenberg, “Soldiers of Fortune Ltd”; Enrique Ballesteros, “Report on the question of the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination”, United Nations Document E/CN.4/1999/11, 13.1.99.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Francis, “Mercenary Intervention in Sierra Leone”, p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ballesteros, E/CN.4/1999/11, para. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Francis, “Mercenary Intervention”, p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Enrique Ballesteros Report on the question of the use of mercenaries as a means of violat-ing human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination. United Nations Document A/54/326 7/9/99. Paragraph 52.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ibid, para. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid, para. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid, para. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Regulation of Foreign Military assistance Bill, South African Ministry of Defence (B54–97), para 6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. “Cook to lift ban on mercenaries”, The Sunday Times, 3.10.99.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid. See also, “Double edged Sword: The case for a pragmatic assessment of mercenary forces”, The Times, 5.5.98.

    Google Scholar 

  45. “Rough Diamonds”, The Guardian (Education Supplement), 7.9.99.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  48. “Diamonds traded for guns lose their sparkle”, The Sunday Telegraph, 3.10.99.

    Google Scholar 

  49. “De Beers ban on gem sales hits UNITA”, Daily Telegraph, 8.10.99.

    Google Scholar 

  50. See Isenberg, “Soldiers of Fortune Ltd”.

    Google Scholar 

  51. See Gerry Cleaver and Roy May, “African perspectives: regional peacekeeping”.

    Google Scholar 

  52. “Nigerian troops announce Sierra Leone pullout”, BBC World Service, 21.10.99. http://news.bbc.co.uk

  53. A.J. Venter, “Security in the Badlands”, Combat and Survival Dec. 1999, 11(9).

    Google Scholar 

  54. “Zimbabwe losses add up in Congo”, BBC World Service, 25.11.99. http://news.bbc.co.uk

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cleaver, G. (2000). Subcontracting military power: The privatisation of security in contemporary Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Phythian, M. (eds) Under the Counter and over the Border. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9335-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9335-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5569-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9335-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics