Solar Magnetism and the Second Solar Spectrum

Future directions
  • J. O. Stenflo
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 243)


The key to a unified understanding of the fundamental astrophysical building blocks, like magnetoturbulence, flux tubes, dynamo processes, and heating mechanisms, is to be found at the smallest scales. All instruments have a resolution cut-off, beyond which much of the physics is hidden from view. Larger telescope apertures are needed, not only to extend the spatial resolution cut-off to allow us to see structures at the scales of the pressure scale height and photon mean free path, but also to enhance the polarimetric sensitivity, since high-resolution solar observations are always photon starved. An increasingly sophisticated array of indirect diagnostic techniques are becoming available, allowing us to explore the physics beyond any spatial-resolution cut-off in ever greater detail. In particular the applications of the Hanle effect have matured to the extent that we may now go from the simplistic one-parameter models to more realistic interpretative schemes based on continuous distributions for a magnetoturbulent spectrum and use both Zeeman and Hanle observations as joint constraints for a Stokes inversion that aims to determine the free parameters of the magnetoturbulent distributions. The “second solar spectrum” that is due to coherent scattering processes offers a wealth of new diagnostic possibilities, but it has also revealed new physics that is not yet fully understood, since it seems to imply paradoxical properties of the Sun’s magnetic field that appear incompatible with our basic understanding of solar magnetism.

Key words

polarization magnetic fields scattering Sun: photosphere 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bianda, M., Solanki, S.K., Stenflo, J.O.: 1998a, Astron. Astrophys. 331, 760.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianda, M., Stenflo, J.O., Solanki, S.K.: 1998b, Astron. Astrophys. 337, 565.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlsson, M.: 1986, Uppsala Astron. Observ. Report 33.Google Scholar
  4. Engvold, O., Andersen, T. (eds.): 1990, LEST Design, LEST Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Faurobert-Scholl, M.: 1993, Astron. Astrophys. 268, 765.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Faurobert-Scholl, M., Feautrier, N., Machefert, F., Petrovay, K., Spielfiedel, A.: 1995, Astron. Astrophys. 298, 289.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Fluri, D.M., Stenflo, J.O.: 1999, Astron. Astrophys. 341, 902ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Frazier, E.N., Stenflo, J.O.: 1972, Solar Phys. 27, 330.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Howard, R., Stenflo, J.O.: 1972, Solar Phys. 22, 402.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Landi Degl’Innocenti, E.: 1998, Nature 392, 256.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Livingston, W.C., Harvey, J.W.: 1971, in R. Howard (ed.), Solar Magnetic Fields, IAU Symp. 43, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin, S.F.: 1990, in J.O. Stenflo (ed.), Solar Photosphere: Structure, Convection and Magnetic Fields, IAU Symp. 138, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Povel, H.P.: 1995, Optical Engineering 34, 1870.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rüedi, I., Solanki, S.K., Livingston, W., Stenflo, J.O.: 1992, Astron. Astrophys. 263, 323.ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruiz Cobo, B., Del Toro Iniesta, J.C.: 1992, Astrophys. J. 398, 375.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simon, G.W., Brandt, P.N., November, L.J., Scharmer, G.B., Shine, R.A.: 1994, in R.J. Rutten, C.J. Schrijver (eds.), Solar Surface Magnetism, Kluwer, pp. 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Solanki, S.K.: 1993, Space Sci. Rev. 63, 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Solanki, S.K., Zufferey, D., Lin, H., Rüedi, I., Kuhn, J.: 1996, Astron. Astrophys. 310, L33.ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Stenflo, J.O.: 1973, Solar Phys. 32, 41.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stenflo, J.O.: 1982, Solar Phys. 80, 209.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stenflo, J.O.: 1994, Solar Magnetic Fields — Polarized Radiation Diagnostics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stenflo, J.O.: 1996, in J.O. Stenflo, K.N. Nagendra (eds.), Solar Polarization, Proc. 1st SPW, Kluwer, Dordrecht, p. 1 (also Solar Phys. 164, 1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stenflo, J.O., 1997, Astron. Astrophys. 324, 344.ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Stenflo, J.O., Keller, C.U.: 1996, Nature 382, 588.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stenflo, J.O., Keller, C.U.: 1997, Astron. Astrophys. 321, 927.ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Stenflo, J.O., Harvey, J.W., Brault, J.W., Solanki, S.K.: 1984, Astron. Astrophys. 131, 33.Google Scholar
  27. Stenflo, J.O., Keller, C.U., Gandorfer, A.: 1998, Astron. Astrophys. 329, 319.ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Venkatakrishnan, P.: 1986, Nature 322, 156.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, J., Wang, H., Tang, F., Lee, J.W., Zirin, H.: 1995, Solar Phys. 160, 277.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zirin, H.: 1987, Solar Phys. 110, 101.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. O. Stenflo
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of AstronomyETH ZentrumZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations