Advertisement

The Systematisation and Interpretation of Statutes. Some Thoughts on Theoretical and Practical Legal Science

  • Aulis Aarnio
Part of the Law and Philosophy Library book series (LAPS, volume 41)

Abstract

I will begin by specifying the three concepts required to understand the topic. These are the concept of method, the characterisation of what should be understood by legal science (namely, legal dogmatics or “Rechtsdogmatik”) and thirdly, the perspective on the method of discourse adopted in this presentation.

Keywords

Legal Rule Legal Theory Legal Norm Legal Argumentation Regulative Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographical Information

I. Monographs

  1. 1.
    Perillisen oikeusasemasta (On the legal status of an heir), Porvoo, 1967 (including Zusammenfassung).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kysymyksiä testamenttioikeuden alalta (Questions on the law of inheritance), Vammala, 1969 (including Zusammenfassung). Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luentoja perintöoikeudesta I (Lectures on the law of inheritance I), Vammala, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oikeudellisen ajattelun perusteista (On the bases of legal thinking), Vammala, 1971Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luentoja perintöoikeudesta II (Lectures on inheritance law II), Vammala, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jälkisäädökset (Last will and testament), Vammala, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perintöoikeus (Law of inheritance), Vammala, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laki, teko ja tavoite (Law, act and goal), Forssa, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jälkisäädökset (Last will and testament), Vammala, 19752.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    On Legal Reasoning, Loimaa, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aviovarallisuusjärjestelmät (Community property systems), Helsinki, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitä lainoppi on? (What is jurisprudence?), Helsinki, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denkweisen der Rechtswissenschaft, Vienna, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oikeussäännösten tulkinnasta (On the interpretation of statutes), Helsinki, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    (with Sami Mahkonen) Suomen avioliittoikeus (Finnish matrimonial law), Jyväskylä, 1983.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    (with Ahti Saarenpää and Pekka Santala) Maatilan sukupolvenvaihdos (The transfer of a farm to a descendent), Jyväskylä, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    (with Urpo Kangas)) Suomen jäämistöoikeus I (Finnish law of inheritance I), Jyväskylä, 19833.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suomen jäämistöoikeus II (Finnish law of inheritance II), Jyväskylä, 19912.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    (with Markku Helin) Suomen avioliittooikeus (Finnish matrimonial law), Jyväskylä, 19923.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Rational as Reasonable,Dordrecht, 1987.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lo racional como razonable,E. Garzôn Valdés (transi.), Madrid, 1991.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Le rationnel comme raisonnable, G. Warland (transi.), Brussels/Paris, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    (with Markku Helin) Avioliittolain muutetut säännökset (The revised statutes of marriage act), Tampere, 1988.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Laintulkinnan teoria (The theory of legal interpretation), Juva, 1989.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    (with Urpo Kangas and Pertti Puronen) Perunkirjoitusopas (A guide to the inventory of the deceased’s estate), Jyväskylä, 19964.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    (with A. Peczenik and G. Bergholtz) Juridisk argumentation (Legal argumentation), Stockholm, 1990.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    (with Urpo Kangas) Avioliitto, perintö ja testamentti (Marriage, inheritance and last will and testament), Jyväskylä, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Swedish edition Äktenskap, ary och testamente, Jyväskylä, 1995.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Derecho, racionalidad y comunicacidn social. Ensayos sobre filosofia del derecho, Mexico D.F., 1995.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reason and Authority. A Treatise on the Dynamic Paradigm of Legal Dogmatics, Aldershot, 1997.Google Scholar

II. Essays and collections of articles

  1. 1.
    Legal Point of View, Helsinki, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence, Helsinki, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murusia matkan varrelta (Bits and pieces along the way), Tampere, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sankarit vailla siipiä (Heroes without wings), Tampere, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lain ja kohtuuden tähden (For law and reasonableness), Juva/Porvoo, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wegen zu Recht und Billigkeit. Vorträge und Aufsätze, Berlin, 1988.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hämärässä laulaa punakylkirastas (Redwing sings in the twilight), Tampere, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Silmäyksiä (Glances), Tampere, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Järki ja auktoriteetti. Puhuttua ja kirjoitettua vuosilta 1988–1994 (Reason and authority. Words and thoughts from 1988–94), Tampere, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kohtaamisia. Lehtikirjoituksia vuosilta 1994–95 (Encounters. Newspaper articles from 1994–95), Tampere, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sirpaleita (Fragments), Tampere, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ajatuksia Johannes Richterin varjossa. (Thoughts in the shadow of Johannes Richter), Tampere, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aulis Aarnio
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TampereFinland

Personalised recommendations