Abstract
A questionnaire study (Nott and Wellington, 1997) had found that a majority of the science graduates on a teacher training programme conducted some practical work in schools in a fraudulent manner, i.e. they ‘conjured’ to get the right empirical results. During post-questionnaire interviews trainee science teachers claimed that they had also frequently made up results for their practical exercises as undergraduates. This raised the question as to whether it was only the deviants who entered teaching after graduating. An equivalent sample of science graduates on a doctoral programme was interviewed to determine if they had conjured as undergraduates. It was found that the majority of both groups had conjured results for practical exercises as undergraduates. All the doctoral research students could understand why their fellow graduates would need to conjure with and in front of children. None of the doctoral students said that they conjured as researchers although some were convinced that other researchers may do. In conclusion we argue that normative scientific behaviour may be inculcated through investigations and open ended activities where the audience to be persuaded is one’s own peers; counter-normative scientific behaviour may be encouraged by the current systems of university laboratory work where the sole audience to be persuaded is one’s assessor.
Key words
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science Education: Border Crossing into the Subculture of Science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.
Nott, M. and Smith, R. (1995). “Talking your way out of it”, “rigging” and “conjuring”: What science teachers do when practicals “go wrong”. International Journal of Science Education 17 (3), 399–410.
Nott, M. and Wellington, J. (1996a). Ethics and morals in the science classroom. In M. Oakes (ed.) Proceedings of the 1995 ASE INSET Services Annual Conference The Public Understanding of Science–a controversial issue? (pp. 23–32 ) Hatfield: ASE
Nott, M. and Wellington, J. (1996b). When the Black Box Springs Open: Practical Work in School Science and the Nature of Science. International Journal of Science Education 18, (7), 807–818.
Nott, M. and Wellington, J. (1997). Producing the Evidence: Science teachers initiations into practical work Research in Science Education 27, (3) 395–409.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nott, M., Wellington, J. (1999). When does Normative Scientific Behaviour Start?. In: Bandiera, M., Caravita, S., Torracca, E., Vicentini, M. (eds) Research in Science Education in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9307-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9307-6_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5218-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9307-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive