Abstract
The paper takes its departure from the following question: How is it possible that, by a reconstructive history of science as is practised for example by Thomas Kuhn, we can learn something from history, i.e. not only about the facts that may be described and causally-externally-explained by value-free science but also about the reasons,or norms,of practicing good science? Must not this enterprise lead to a dilemma: i.e. either to deriving norms from empirical facts and thus committing a naturalistic fallacy,or to presupposing already norms of scientific rationality in the evaluation of the reasons and norms of the scientists to be understood, and thus to committing a logical circle in the attempt of learning something new about norms of good science.
The response my paper provides to this challenge is presented by introducing the — non-vicious — hermeneutic circle, as a central methodical device of normative hermeneutics. This approach is then illustrated through an argument with Karl Popper’s ‘Third World Hermeneutics’ (and, in passing, with Imre Lakatos’). In this context, the method of the hermeneutic circle as I understand it, amounts to a synthesis between Third World Hermeneutics, taken as a heuristics, and hermeneutic experience, taken as a semiotically specific kind of empirical evidence which is different from empirical evidence in the natural sciences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Apel, K.-O. Die Erklären/Verstehen-Kontroverse in transzendentalpragmatischer Sicht Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp 1979. (Engl. Übersetzung: Understanding and Exploration. A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1984 )
Apel, K.-O.Die Idee der Sprache in der Tradition des Humanismus von Dante bis Vico. 3. Aufl. Bonn: Bouvier 1980
Apel, K.-O.“C. S. Peirce and Post-Tarskian Truth”. in: E. Freeman (ed.): The Relevance of Charles Peirce La Salle, Ill.: The Hegeler Institute, 1983, S. 189–223.
Apel, K.-O.“Intentions, Conventions, and Reference to Things: Dimensions of Understanding. Meaning in Hermeneutics and in Analytic Philosophy of Language”. In: H. Parret/J. Bouveresse (Hg.): Meaning and Understanding. Berlin-New York: de Gruyter 1981. S. 79–111
Apel, K.-O.“Linguistic Meaning and Intentionality. The Compatibility of the `Linguistic Turn’ and the Pragmatic Turn’ of Meaning Theory Within the Framework of a Transcendental Semiotics”. In: H. Silverman./D. Welton (Hg.): Critical and Dialectical Phenomenology. Albany: State University of NewYork Press 1987. S. 2–53
Böhler, D.: Rekonstruktive Pragmatik. Frankfurt/M.. Suhrkamp 1985
Buck, R. C./Cohen, R. S. (Hg.): Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science VIII. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel 1971
Feyerabend, P.: Against Method. Outline of an anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Books 1975
Kuhn, Th. S.. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1962. 2. Aufl. mit einer Nachschrift 1969
Kuhn, Th. S. “Notes on Lakatos”. In: Buck, R. C./Cohen, R. S. (Hg.): Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science VIII. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel 1971 S. 137–146
Lakatos, I.: “History of Science and its Rational Reconstruction”. In: Buck, R.C./Cohen, R.S. (Hg.): Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science VIII. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel 1971 S. 91 136
Lakatos, I./Musgrave, A. (Hg.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1971
Olschki, L.: Geschichte der neusprachlichen wissenschaftlichen Literatur 3 Bd.e. Heidelberg — Halle, 1919–27
Popper, K.R.: The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan 1967
Popper, K.R. “On the Theory of Objective Mind” (1968). In: Ders.. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1972 Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1972
Popper, K.R. Conjectures and Refutations. 4. Aufl. London: Routledge and Kegan 1972
Popper, K.R. “The Logic of the Social Sciences” In: Th.W. Adorno u.a.: The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. London: Heinemann 1976
Rickert, H.: Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung 4. Aufl. Tübingen 1921
Rickert, H. Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. 7. Aufl. Tübingen 1926
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Apel, KO. (1999). Wissenschaftsgeschichte als Hermeneutisches Problem. In: Fehér, M., Kiss, O., Ropolyi, L. (eds) Hermeneutics and Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 206. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9293-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9293-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5257-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9293-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive