Skip to main content

The Changing of the Role Accorded to the Lay Public in Science

  • Chapter
Hermeneutics and Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 206))

Abstract

Reflecting upon the topic indicated by the title, I was astonished to realize that although many different roles (moral, political, financial ones) are accorded to the public by thinkers of different persuasions and fields of expertise, none of the roles is, however, a truly cognitive one.1 And that none of the strictly taken philosophers of science in the last two centuries has been concerned with systematically exploring the cognitive aspect of the relationship between science and its public. Lots of excellent papers deal with how the public can promote or hinder (by political or financial means) scientific research, but none of them with whether the public has or can have a role at all in the process of scientific cognition and how this would affect the evaluation and acceptance of knowledge claims within science itself.

A former version of this paper has been published in the International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1990.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Algarotti, F. (1739): Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy Explain’d for the Use of the Ladies (London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Basalla, G. (1976): Popular Science: the Depiction of Science in Pop Culture, in: Holton and Blanpied eds. (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. (1988): Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity: The Core-set Revisited, Soc. Stud. Sci. vol. 18. No. 4., Nov. 1988. pp. 725–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culliton, R.: Science’s Restive Public, in: Holton and Morrison (eds.) (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elena, A. (1987): The Birth of the Experimental Method: an Externalist Approach (ms. of a talk given at the Boston Colloquium, Oct. 1987 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehér, M. (1990): The Triumphal March of a Paradigm, TRACTRIX, Vol. 2, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1977): Science in a Free Society, NLB, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1987): On Regulating What is Known: A Way to Social Epistemology, Synthese, vol. 71, No. 1, Oct. 1987. pp. 145–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1987): Modelling Collective Belief, Synthese, vol. 73. no. 1. Oct. 1987, pp. 184–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1987): Foundations of Social Epistemics, Synthese, vol. 73, No.1., Oct. 1987., pp. 109–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1975): The Emergence of Probability, Cambridge Univ. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwig, J. (1985): Epistemic Dependence, J. Phil. vol. LXXXII, No. 7. July, 1985, pp. 335–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. and Blanpied, W. (1976) eds.: Science and its Public: the Changing Relationship, BSPS XXXIII, Reidel Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. and Morrison, R.S. (eds.) (1979): Limits of Scientific Inquiry,New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1902): An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Selby and Bitge ed., Oxford, Oxford Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1894): An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Fraser (ed.) Oxford, Oxford Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, F. (1987): Justification, Sociality and Autonomy, Synthese, vol. 73, No. 1, Oct. 1987. pp. 43–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1984): Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology, Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 14, No. 4, Nov. 1984. pp. 481–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. and Schaffer S. (1985): Leviathan and the Air-Pump,Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. (1983): Probability and Certainly in 17th century England, Princeton, Univ. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. and Grofman, B. (1984): Optimizing Group Judgmental Accuracy in the Presence of Interdependence, Public Choice 43, pp. 329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shils, R. (1976): Faith, Utility and Legitimacy of Science, in: Holton and Blanpied eds. (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1979): Remarks made at a conference on Biomedical Research and the Public, Airlie House, Apr. 1976 (quoted by Culliton, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fehér, M. (1999). The Changing of the Role Accorded to the Lay Public in Science. In: Fehér, M., Kiss, O., Ropolyi, L. (eds) Hermeneutics and Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 206. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9293-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9293-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5257-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9293-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics