Abstract
The Polish trade union is called Solidarity. Its members were active in the protest movement against communist party leader Jaruzelski. By collective actions such as strikes and demonstrations, the Polish suppression system of the seventies and early eighties was unsettled and finally collapsed. What is the motivation behind joint action? When does it occur and when does it not occur? Is it possible to distinguish between several types of solidarity or is each and every joint action in its basic elements equivalent with the protest movement in Poland? What are the causes of solidarity, the attitudes of the participants of joint actions, the cohesiveness of the group, or peculiarities of the social system? These questions will be tackled in the following essay with a special emphasis on the motivation of joint action and the social context under which it exerts its influence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Adams, J. S.: 1965, Inequity in social exchange’, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology,vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M.: 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NY.
Alain, M.: 1985, An empirical validation of relative deprivation’, Human Relations 38, 739749.
Austin, W. and Walster, E.: 1975, Equity with the world: the transrelational effects of equity and inequity’, Sociometry 38, 474–496.
Axelrod, R.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.
Axelrod, R.: 1986, An evolutionary approach to norms’, American Political Science Review 80, 1095–1111.
Batson, C. D.: 1994, Why act for the public good? Four answers’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, 603–610.
Batson, C. D.: 1995, Prosocial motivation: Why do we help others’, in A. Tesser (ed.), Advanced Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 333–381.
Bierhoff, H. W.: 1988, Affect, cognition, and prosocial behavior’, in K. Fiedler and J. Forgas (eds.), Affect, Cognition and Social Behavior, Hogrefe, Lewiston, NY, pp. 167–182.
Bierhoff, H. W.: 1993a, Attitude toward the disadvantaged: determinants and correlates’, in European Association of Experimental Social Psychology (ed.), Social Psychology in Europe, Abstract Book, p. 215.
Bierhoff, H. W.: 1993b, Sozialpsychologie (Social Psychology), Kohlhammer, Stuttgart. Bornstein, G. and Ben-Yossef, M.: 1994, Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30, 52–67.
Brehm, S. S. and Kassin, S. M.: 1993, Social Psychology, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Chen, X. P. and Komorita, S. S.: 1994, The effects of communication and commitment in an public goods social dilemma’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60, 367–386.
Crosby, F.: 1976, A model of egoistical relative deprivation’, Psychological Review 83, 85113.
Dawes, R. M.: 1988, Rational Choice in an Uncertain World, Harcourt Brace, San Diego, CA. Dawes, R. M. McTavish, J. and Shaklee, H.: 1977, Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a common dilemma situation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 1–11.
Deutsch, M.: 1982, Interdependence and psychological orientation’, in V. Derlege and J. Grzelak (eds.), Cooperation and Helping Behavior: Theories and Research, Academic Press, San Diego, Ca, pp. 15–42.
Dion, K. L.: 1986, Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation’, in J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman and M. P. Zanna (eds.), Relative Deprivation and Social Comparison, • Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 159–179.
Doise, W.: 1986, Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dorris, J. W.: 1972, Reactions to unconditional cooperation: A field study emphasizing variables neglected in laboratory research’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 22, 387–397.
Edney, J. J.: 1980, The commons problem: Alternative perspectives’, American Psychologist 35, 131–150.
Eisenberg, N. and Miller, P.: 1987, Empathy and prosocial behavior’, Psychological Bulletin 101, 91–119.
Eisenberger, R., Cotterell, N. and Marvel, J.: 1987, Reciprocation ideology’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 743–750.
Gouldner, A. W.: 1960, The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement’, American Sociological Review 25, 161–178.
Gurney, J. N. and Tierney, K. J.: 1982, Relative deprivation and social movements: A critical look at twenty years of theory and research’, Sociological Quarterly 23, 33–47.
Hertel, G. and Fiedler, K.: 1994, Affective and cognitive influences in a social dilemma game’, European Journal of Social Psychology 24, 131–145.
Hoffman, M. L.: 1976, Empathy, role taking, guilt, and development of altruistic motives’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior, Holt, New York, pp. 124–143.
Holländer, H.: 1990, A social exchange approach to voluntary cooperation’, American Economic Review 80, 1157–1167.
Jones, E. E. and Pittman, T. S.: 1982, Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation’, in J. Suls (ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self, vol. 1, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 231–262.
Kelley, H. H. and Thibaut, J. W.: 1978, Interpersonal Relations, Wiley, New York.
Kerr, N. L. and Kaufmann-Gilliland, C. M.: 1994, Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 513–529.
Knight, G. P. and Dubro, A. F.: 1984, Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic social values: An individualized regression and clustering approach’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 98–105.
Komorita, S. S. and Barth, J. M.: 1985, Components of reward in social dilemmas’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, 364–373.
Komorita, S. S., Chan, D. K. S. and Parks, C.: 1993, The effects of reward structure and reciprocity in social dilemmas’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29, 252–267.
Lane, J. and Anderson, N. H.: 1976, Integration of intention and outcome in moral judgment’,Memory and Cognition 4, 1–5.
Liebrand, W. B. G.: 1984, The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an n-person multi-stage mixed-motive game’, European Journal of Social Psychology 14, 239–264.
Lynn, M. and Oldenquist, A.: 1986, Egoistic and nonegoistic motives in social dilemmas’, American Psychologist 41, 529–534.
Messick, D. M. and Brewer, M. B.: 1983, Solving social dilemmas: A review’, in L. Wheeler and P. Shaver (eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 4, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 11–44.
Messick, D. M. and McClintock, C. G.: 1968, Motivational bases of choice in experimental games’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4, 1–25.
Misra, J., and Hicks, A.: 1994, Catholicism and unionization in affluent postwar democracies: Catholicism, culture, party and unionization’, American Sociological Review 59, 304–326.
Montada, L., Schmitt, M. and Dalbert, C.: 1986, Thinking about justice and dealing with one’s own privileges: A study of existential guilt’, in H. W. Bierhoff, R. Cohen and J. Greenberg (eds.), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum, New York, pp. 125–143.
Montada, L. and Schneider, A.: 1991, Justice and prosocial commitments’, in L. Montada and H. W. Bierhoff (eds.), Altruism in Social Systems, Hogrefe, Lewiston, New York, pp. 58–81.
Newton, J. W., Mann, L. and Geary, D.: 1980, Relative deprivation, dissatisfaction, and militancy: A field study in a protest crowd’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 10, 384397.
Orbell, J. M. and Dawes, R. M.: 1993, Social welfare, cooperators’ advantage, and the option of not playing the game’, American Sociological Review 58, 787–800.
Orbell, J. M., van de Kragt, A. J. C. and Dawes, R. M.: 1988, Explaining discussion-induced cooperation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 811–819.
Parks, C. D. and Vu, A. D.: 1994, Social dilemma behavior of individuals from highly individualist and collectivist cultures’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 38, 708–718.
Pruitt, D. G.: 1968, Reciprocity and credit building in a laboratory dyad’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8, 143–147.
Pruitt, D. G. and Kimmel, M. J.: 1977, Twenty years of experimental gaming: critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future’, Annual Review of Psychology 28, 363–392.
Raub, W. and Voss, T.: 1986, Die Sozialstruktur der Kooperation rationaler Egoisten’,Zeitschrift für Soziologie 15, 309–323.
Runciman, W. G.: 1966, Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, University of California Press, Berkely, CA.
Sayles, M. L.: 1984, Relative deprivation and collective protest: An impoverished theory?’, Sociological Inquiry 54, 449–465.
Stäcker, K.: 1977, Frustration, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.
Stern, P. C.: 1986, Toward a social psychology of solidarity’, American Psychologist 41, 229231.
Stroebe, W. and Frey, B. S.: 1982, Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods’, British Journal of Social Psychology 21, 121–137.
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C.: 1986, The social identity theory of intergroup behavior’, in S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, II, pp. 7–24.
Tajfel, H. and Wilkes, A. L.: 1963, Classification and quantitative judgment’, British Journal of Psychology 54, 101–114.
Tedeschi, J. T.: 1970, Threats and promises’, in P. Swingle (ed.), The Structure of Conflict, Academic Press, New York, pp. 155–191.
Tedeschi, J. T. and Riess, M.: 1981, Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research’, in J. T. Tedeschi (ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research, Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–22.
ter Voert, M., Felling, A. and Peters, J.: 1994, The effect of religion on self-interest morality’, Review of Religious Research 35, 302–323.
Tesser, A., Gatewood, R. and Driver, M.: 1968, Some determinants of gratitude’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9, 233–236.
Trafimow, D. and Fishbein, M.: 1994, The moderation effect of behavior type on the subjective norm-behavior relationship’, Journal of Social Psychology 134, 755–763.
Triandis, H. C.: 1989, The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts’, Psychological Review 96, 506–520.
Tripathi, R. C. and Srivastava, R.: 1981, Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes’, European Journal of Social Psychology 11, 313–318.
Turner, J. C.: 1987, Rediscovering the Social Group. A Self-Categorization Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.
Van Lange, P. A. M. and Kuhlman, D. M.: 1994, Social value orientations and impressions of partner’s honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 126–141.
Van Lange, P. A. M. and Liebrand, W. B. G.: 1991, The influence of other’s morality and own social orientation on cooperation in the Netherlands and the U.S.A.’, International Journal of Psychology 26, 429–449.
Walker, I. and Mann, L.: 1987, Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13, 275–283.
Wilke, H. A. M. and Braspenning, J.: 1989, Reciprocity: Choice shift in a social trap’, European Journal of Social Psychology 19, 317–326.
Witt, L. A. and Silver, N. C.: 1994, The effects of social responsibility and satisfaction on extrarole behaviors’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 15, 329–338.
Yamagashi, T. and Cook, K. S.: 1993, ‘Generalized exchange and social dilemmas’, Social Psychology Quarterly 56, 235–248.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bierhoff, H.W., Küpper, B. (1999). Social Psychology of Solidarity. In: Bayertz, K. (eds) Solidarity. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5137-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9245-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive