Skip to main content

Toulmin’s Argumentation Model

  • Chapter
Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation

Part of the book series: Argumentation Library ((ARGA,volume 1))

  • 346 Accesses

Abstract

In The Uses of Argument (1958), Stephen Toulmin introduces his argumentation model. The central question in this book is which norms must be applied in evaluating argumentation. According to Toulmin, the logical criterion of formal validity is not adequate for the evaluation of arguments in everyday language because it does not take into account the specific material criteria of soundness in various fields in which these arguments occur. Using his argumentation model, Toulmin tries to show that evaluation norms are partly universal, or ‘field-invariant’ as he puts it, and partly specific, or ‘field-dependent’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Because Toulmin’s argumentation theory and its advantages and disadvantages have been discussed at length by others, I will confine myself here to a short description of the model. For or a more comprehensive discussion of Toulmin’s model, see van Eemeren et al. (1996:129–162). See also Alexy (1989:79–92), Horovitz (1972:167–175).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Outside the field of legal argumentation, there are also other applications of Toulmin’s model. See van Eemeren et al. (1996:149–153) for an overview of applications.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Toulmin, Rieke and Janik (1984:38,46,62,86) and Snoeck Henkemans (1992:46).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henket (1991) uses the model for practical argumentation used by Jonsen and Toulmin (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Snedaker’s analysis shows that a simple argument can, in principle, be analyzed in terms of Toulmin’s model. However, she does not answer the question of how more complex forms of argument can be analyzed.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feteris, E.T. (1999). Toulmin’s Argumentation Model. In: Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. Argumentation Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9219-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9219-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5175-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9219-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics