Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diversity in Phaseolus Species in Relation to the Common Bean

  • Chapter
Book cover Common Bean Improvement in the Twenty-First Century

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant Breeding ((DIPB,volume 7))

Abstract

The genus was originally defined by Linnaeus (see Delgado Salinas, 1985; Westphal, 1974). The poor initial definition of the genus, together with the biological wealth of tropical forms in this group of legumes, resulted in the naming of hundreds of species (over 400), especially in the period 1810–1910. Early reviews by Bentham (1840), Hassler (1923), and Piper (1926), however, contributed to the clarification of natural groups at a higher level, and lead to the definition of several sections. Consolidation of these sections, mostly after 1950, thanks to the contributions of Urban (1928), Verdcourt (1970), Maréchal et al. (1978), and Lewis & Delgado Salinas (1994), resulted in several new genera, including Vigna, Phaseolus sensu stricto, Macroptilium, Ramirezella, and recently Misanthus. At the International Legume Conference of 1978, a definition of the genus was narrowly defined for a natural group of American legumes within the Phaseolinae with the following main attributes: stipules not extending below insertion, presence of uncinate hairs, floral bracts persistent up to or past flowering, absence of extra floral nectaries, and style not extending beyond the stigma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abawi, G. S., R. Provvidenti, D.C. Crosier & J.E. Hunter. 1978. Inheritance of resistance to white mold disease in Phaseolus coccineus. J. Hered. 69:200–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acosta Gallegos, J., C. Quintero, J. Vargas, O. Toro, J. Tohme & C. Cardona. 1998. A new variant of arcelin in wild common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L., from southern Mexico. Genet. Resources & Crop Evol. 45:235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam-Blondon, A.F., M. Sévignac, H. Bannerot & M. Dron. 1994. SCAR, RAPD and RFLP markers linked to a dominant gene (Are) conferring resistance to anthracnose in common bean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:865–870.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, M.N., P.D. Ascher & D.W. Davis. 1981. Interspecific hybridization in Euphaseolus through embryo rescue. HortScience 16:541–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Yasiri, S.A. & D.P. Coyne. 1964. Effect of growth regulators in delaying pod abscission and embryo abortion in the interspecific cross Phaseolus vulgaris × P. acutifolius. Crop Sci. 4:433–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Yasiri, S.A. & D.P. Coyne. 1966. Interspecific hybridization in the genus Phaseolus. Crop Sci. 6:59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade-Aguilar, J.A. & M.T. Jackson. 1988. Attempts at interspecific hybridization between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. acutifolius A.Gray using embryo rescue. Plant Breed. 101:173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baggett, J.R. 1956. The inheritance of resistance to strains of bean yellow mosaic virus in the interspecific cross Phaseolus vulgaris × P. coccineus. Plant Dis. Rptr. 40:702–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannerot, H. 1979. Cold tolerance in beans. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 22:81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa Fevereiro, V.P. 1986–87. Macroptilium (Bentham) Urban do Brasil (Leguminosae — Faboideae — Phaseoleae — Phaseolinae). Arq. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 28:109–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, M.J. 1996. List of genes — Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 39:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basurto Peña, F.A., D. Martinez Moreno, M.A. Martinez Alfaro & A. Castellanos Villegas. 1996. Frijol gordo abreviador, una forma precoz de Phaseolus coccineus L. spp. darwinianus Hernández X. & Miranda C, en Nauzontla, Pue. Geografia Agrícola (México) 22–23:95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudoin, J.P., J.P. Barthélémy & V. Ndungo. 1991. Variability of cyanide contents in the primary and secondary genepools of the lima bean, Phaseolus lunatus L. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genet. Resources Newsl. 85:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudoin, J.P., R. Maréchal, E. Otoul & F. Camarena. 1985. Interspecific hybridizations within the Phaseolus vulgaris — Phaseolus coccineus L. complex. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 28:64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerra Velásquez, V.L. & P. Gepts. 1994. RFLP diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in its centres of origin. Genome 37:256–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, S., O. Toro Ch., A.V. González, M.I. Chacón & D.G. Debouck. 1997. Wild-weed-crop complexes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) in the Andes of Peru and Colombia, and their implications for conservation and breeding. Genet. Resources & Crop Evol. 44:73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belivanis, T. & C. Doré. 1986. Interspecific hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. angustissimus A. Gray using in vitro embryo culture. Plant Cell Rep. 5:329–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G. 1840. De leguminosarum generibus commentationes. Annin. Wien. Mus. Naturg. 2:61–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, M. 1984. Gregor Mendel: la légende du génie méconnu. La Recherche 151:46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak, J.P. & E. Kooistra. 1975. A successful cross between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. ritensis Jones with the aid of embryo culture. Euphytica 24:669–679.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., N. Anderson & P. Ascher. 1996. Congruity backcross (CBC) hybrids used to create three-species hybrids with Phaseolus acutifolius cytoplasm. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 39:98–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrow, R. 1981. Stress tolerance of Southwestern Phaseolinae. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 24:94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrow, R.A. 1980. Frost tolerance of the Phaseolinae of the Southwestern United States. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 23:62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, J.B. & O.J. Crocomo. 1989. Interspecific hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris, P. acutifolius and P. lunatus using in vitro technique. Turrialba 39:243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caicedo, A.L., E. Gaitán, M.C. Duque, O. Toro Chica, D.G. Debouck & J. Tohme. 1999. AFLPs fingerprinting of Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) and related wild species of South America. Crop Sci. 39:(in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarena, F. & J.P. Baudoin. 1987. Obtention des premiers hybrides interspécifiques entre Phaseolus vulgaris et Phaseolus polyanthus avec le cytoplasme de cette dernière forme. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 22:43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, C. & J. Kornegay. 1989. Use of wild Phaseolus vulgaris to improve beans for resistance to bruchids. pp. 90–98. In S. Beebe (ed), Current Topics in Breeding of Common beans. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S.S., M.J. Bassett & K.H. Quesenberry. 1981. Cytogenetic analysis of interspecific hybrids between common bean and scarlet runner bean. Crop Sci. 21:75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, D.P., M.L. Schuster & S. Al-Yasiri. 1963. Reaction studies of bean species and varieties to common blight and bacterial wilt. Plant Dis. Rptr. 47:534–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G. 1989. Early beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. lunatus L.) domesticated for their aesthetic value? Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 32:62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G. 1990. Wild beans as a food resource in the Andes. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 33:102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G. 1991. Systematics and morphology, pp. 55–118. In A. van Schoonhoven & O. Voysest (eds.), Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement. C.A.B. Int., Wallingford, U.K. & CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G. 1992. Frijoles, Phaseolus spp. pp. 45–60. In E. Hernández Bermejo & J. León (eds.), Cultivos Marginados: Otra Perspectiva de 1492. FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G. 1996. Colombian common and Lima beans: views on their origin and evolutionary significance. Revista CORPOICA 1:7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G., R. Araya Villalobos, R.A. Ocampo Sánchez & W.G. González Ugalde. 1989a. Collecting Phaseolus in Costa Rica. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genet. Resources Newsl. 78/79:44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G., R. Castillo & J. Tohme. 1989b. Observations on little-known Phaseolus germplasm of Ecuador. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genet. Resources Newsl. 80:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G. & J. Smartt. 1995. Beans, Phaseolus spp. (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). pp. 287–294. In J. Smartt & N.W. Simmonds (eds.), Evolution of Crop Plants. 2nd ed. Longman, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck, D.G., O. Toro, O.M. Paredes, W.C. Johnson & P. Gepts. 1993. Genetic diversity and ecological distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in northwestern South America. Econ. Bot. 47:408–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Salinas, A. 1985. Systematics of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae) in North and Central America. Ph.D. dissertation. Univ. of Texas, Austin, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Salinas, A., A. Bruneau & J.J. Doyle. 1993. Chloroplast DNA phylogenetic studies in New World Phaseolinae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Phaseoleae). Syst. Bot. 18:6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Salinas, A., T. Turley & M. Lavin. 1998. Cultivated and wild species of Phaseolus in phylogenetic context. Amer. J. Bot. (supplem) 85:123. (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, A.S., L.H. Pollard & A.P. Lorz. 1962. Cytological behavior of an F1 species cross (Phaseolus lunatus L. var Fordhook × Phaseoluspolystachyus L.). Cytologia 27:369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A.M. 1980. Structure, variation, evolution, and classification in Phaseolus. pp. 337–347. In R.J. Summerfield & A.H. Bunting (eds.), Advances in Legume Science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, C.T. & J.G. Waines. 1988. Interspecific hybrid compatibility of selected Phaseolus vulgaris L. lines with P. acutifolius A. Gray, P. lunatus L., and P. filiformis Bentham. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 31:201–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, C.T. & J.G. Waines. 1989. Interspecific hybridization of common beans with tepary beans. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 32:70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermond, C. 1855. Recherches sur les fécondations réciproques de quelques végétaux. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 2:748–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fofana, B., J.P. Baudoin, X. Vekemans, D.G. Debouck & P. du Jardin. 1999. Molecular evidence for an Andean origin and a secondary gene pool for the Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) using chloroplast DNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:202–212.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G.F. 1918. Southwestern beans and teparies. Bulletin No. 68. Univ. Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn, Tucson, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyre, R., P.W. Skroch, V. Geffroy, A.F. Adam-Blondon, A. Shirmohamadali, W.C. Johnson, V. Llaca, R.O. Nodari, P.A. Pereira, S.M. Tsai, J. Tohme, M. Dron, J. Nienhuis, C.E. Vallejos & P. Gepts. 1998. Towards an integrated linkage map of common bean. 4. Development of a core linkage map and alignment of RFLP maps. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:847–856.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freytag, G.F. 1975. Research related to the origin and improvement of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). pp. 159–163. In J. Bird & K. Maramorosch (eds), Tropical Diseases of Legumes. Academic Press, New York, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freytag, G.F. & D.G. Debouck. 1996. Phaseolus costaricensis, a new wild bean species (Phaseolinae, Leguminosae) from Costa Rica and Panama, Central America. NO VON 6:157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garver, S. 1934. The Redfield tepary bean, an early maturing variety. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 3:397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D.F. & N.F. Weeden. 1994. Isozyme evidence supporting a single geographic origin for domesticated tepary bean. Crop Sci. 34:1390–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepts, P. 1988. A middle American and an Andean common bean gene pool. pp. 375–390. In P. Gepts (ed.), Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepts, P. & D.G. Debouck. 1991. Origin, domestication, and evolution of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). pp. 7–53. In A. van Schoonhoven & O. Voysest (eds.), Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement. C.A.B. Int., Wallingford, U.K. & CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepts, P., T.C. Osborn, K. Rashka & F.A. Bliss. 1986. Phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Econ. Bot. 40:451–468.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González, A., J. Lynch, J.M. Tohme, S.E. Beebe & R.E. Macchiaveli. 1995. Characters related to leaf photosynthesis in wild populations and landraces of common bean. Crop Sci. 35:1468–1476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V. 1975. Genetics of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, M., D.A. Lightfoot, M.C. Mok & D.W.S. Mok. 1991. Analyses of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus Lam. hybrids by RFLP: preferential transmission of P. vulgaris alleles. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:703–709.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, M., M.C. Mok & D.W.S. Mok. 1994. RFLP analysis of preferential transmission in interspecific hybrids of Phaseolus vulgaris and P. coccineus. J. Hered. 85:174–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez Salgado, A., P. Gepts & D.G. Debouck. 1995. Evidence for two gene pools of the Lima bean, Phaseolus lunatus L., in the Americas. Genet. Resources & Crop Evol. 42:15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi, K.R. & P.D. Ascher. 1988. Fertile, intermediate hybrids between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. acutifolius from congruity backcrossing. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1:51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, A., D. Zink & W. Nagl. 1995. Microsatellite fingerprinting in the genus Phaseolus. Genome 38:507–515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassler, E. 1923. Revisio specierum austro-americanarum generis Phaseoli L. Candollea 1:417–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C.H. 1988. Aspects of unconscious selection and the evolution of domesticated plants. Euphytica 37:77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, G.W. 1919. Climatic adaptations of the white tepary bean. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 11:247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Xolocotzi, E., S. Miranda Colin & C. Prywer. 1959. El origen de Phaseolus coccineus L. darwinianus Hdz. X. & Miranda C, subspecies nova. Rev. Soc. Mex. Hist. Nat. 20:99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervieu, F., H. Bannerot & G. Pelletier. 1994. A unique cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) determinant is present in three Phaseolus species characterized by different mitochondrial genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:314–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hervieu, F., L. Charbonnier, H. Bannerot & G. Pelletier. 1993. The cytoplasmic male-sterility (CMS) determinant of common bean is widespread in Phaseolus coccineus L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. Curr. Genet. 24:149–155.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honma, S. 1956. A bean interspecific hybrid. J. Hered. 47:217–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honma, S. & O. Heeckt. 1959. Interspecific hybrid between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. lunatus. J. Hered. 50:233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbeling, N. 1957. New aspects of breeding for disease resistance in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 6:111–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucl, P. & G.J. Scoles. 1985. Interspecific hybridization in the common bean: a review. HortScience 20:352–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.E., M.H. Dickson, M.A. Boettger & J. A. Cigna. 1982. Evaluation of plant introductions of Phaseolus spp. for resistance to white mold. Plant Dis. 66:320–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, A.M. & D.P. Coyne. 1975. Genetics of stigma shape, cotyledon position, and flower color in reciprocal crosses between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus coccineus (Lam.) and implications in breeding. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100:622–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaaska, V. 1996. Isoenzyme diversity and phylogenetic affinities among the Phaseolus beans (Fabaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 200:233–252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, M., D. Zink & W. Nagl. 1995. RFLPs of the rRNA genes in the genus Phaseolus. Genet. Resources & Crop Evol. 42:97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, G., D.P. Coyne & P. Read. 1992. Interspecific hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris × Phaseolus acutifolius. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 35:206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kami, J., V. Becerra Velásquez, D.G. Debouck & P. Gepts. 1995. Identification of presumed ancestral DNA sequences of phaseolin in Phaseolus vulgaris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92:1101–1104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. 1965. Archeology and domestication in American Phaseolus (beans). Econ. Bot. 19:358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, L. & L.N. Kaplan. 1988. Phaseolus in archaeology, pp. 125–142. In P. Gepts (ed), Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katanga, K. & J.P. Baudoin. 1987a. Obtention de nouveaux hybrides interspécifiques avec Phaseolus lunatus L. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 22:33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katanga, K. & J.P. Baudoin. 1987b. Obtention et observations d’un nouvel hybride interspécifique entre deux espèces sauvages: Phaseolus filiformis Benth. × Phaseolus angustissimus A. Gray. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 22:153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katanga, K. & J.P. Baudoin. 1990. Analyses méiotiques des hybrides F1 et étude des descendances F2 chez quatre combinaisons interspécifiques avec Phaseolus lunatus L. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 25:237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J.D. & P.N. Miklas. 1998. The role of RAPD markers in breeding for disease resistance in common bean. Mol. Breed. 4:1–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khairallah, M.M., B.B. Sears & M.W. Adams. 1992. Mitochondrial restriction fragment length polymorphisms in wild Phaseolus vulgaris L.: insights on the domestication of the common bean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:915–922.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1991. The neutral theory of molecular evolution: a review of recent evidence. Jap. J. Genet. 66:367–386.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kloz, J. & E. Klozová. 1974. The protein euphaseolin in Phaseolinae — a chemotaxonomical study. Biol. Plant. 16:290–299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, R. & P. Gepts. 1989. Allozyme diversity in wild Phaseolus vulgaris: further evidence for two major centers of genetic diversity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78:809–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, R.L., S.P. Singh & P. Gepts. 1990. Novel phaseolin types in wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot. 44:50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koinange, E.M.K., S.P. Singh & P. Gepts. 1996. Genetic control of the domesticationsyndrome in common bean. Crop Sci. 36:1037–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuboyama, T., Y. Shintaku & G. Takeda. 1991. Hybrid plant of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. lunatus L. obtained by means of embryo rescue and confirmed by restriction endonuclease analysis of rDNA. Euphytica 54:177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, J. A. 1983. A review of generic concepts in American Phaseolinae (Fabaceae, Faboideae). Iselya 2:21–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht, H. 1945. A new ornamental plant from a cross between the garden bean and the scarlet runner bean. Agric. Hortique Genetica 3:14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Marchand, G. 1971. Observations sur quelques hybrides dans le genre Phaseolus. 1. Le problème des incompatibilités interspécifiques. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 6:441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Marchand, G. & R. Maréchal. 1977. Chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids reveal the value of pollen morphology for deducting phylogenetic affinities in the genus Phaseolus. pp. 335–337. In Proceedings 8th Congr. Eucarpia, Interspecific hybridization in plant breeding, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Marchand, G., R. Maréchal & J.C. Baudet. 1976. Observations sur quelques hybrides dans le genre Phaseolus. 3. P. lunatus: nouveaux hybrides et considérations sur les affinités interspécifiques. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 11:183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M.F., L.C. Stephens & W.L. Summers. 1987. Effect of maternal genotype on development of Phaseolus vulgaris L. × P. lunatus L. interspecific hybrid embryos. Euphytica 36:327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepoivre, P. & J.P. Baudoin. 1994. Caractérisation de l’agent responsable de l’ascochytose de Phaseolus vulgaris en Afrique et en Amérique du Sud. Bull. Séances Acad. Roy. Sci. Outre-Mer (Belgique) 39:557–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G.P. & A. Delgado Salinas. 1994. Mysanthus, a new genus in tribe Phaseoleae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) from Brazil. Kew Bull. 49:343–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llaca, V., A. Delgado Salinas & P. Gepts. 1994. Chloroplast DNA as an evolutionary marker in the Phaseolus vulgaris complex. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:646–652.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorz, A.P. 1952. An interspecific cross involving the Lima bean Phaseolus lunatus L. Science 115:702–703.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J., A. González, J.M. Tohme & J. Garcia. 1992. Variation in characters related to leaf photosynthesis in wild bean populations. Crop Sci. 32:633–640.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manshardt, R.M. & M.J. Bassett. 1984. Inheritance of stigma position in Phaseolus vulgaris × P. coccineus hybrid populations. J. Hered. 75:45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maréchal, R. 1971. Observations sur quelques hybrides dans le genre Phaseolus. 2. Les phénomènes méiotiques. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 6:461–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maréchal, R. & J.P. Baudoin. 1978. Observations sur quelques hybrides dans le genre Phaseolus. 4. L’hybride Phaseolus vulgaris × P. filiformis. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 13:233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maréchal, R., J.M. Mascherpa & F. Stainier. 1978. Etude taxonomique d’un groupe complexe d’espèces des genres Phaseolus et Vigna (Papilionaceae) sur la base de données morphologiques et polliniques, traitées par l’analyse informatique. Boissiera 28:1–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVaugh, R. 1987. Flora Novo-Galiciana — A descriptive account of the vascular plants of western Mexico — Volume 5 Leguminosae. The Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejía-Jiménez, A., C. Muñoz, H.J. Jacobsen, W.M. Roca& S.P. Singh. 1994. Interspecific hybridization between common and tepary beans: increased hybrid embryo growth, fertility, and efficiency of hybridization through recurrent and congruity backcrossing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:324–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklas, P.N. & J. Santiago. 1996. Reaction of selected tepary bean to bean golden mosaic virus. HortScience 31:430–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda Colin, S. & A.M. Evans. 1973. Exploring the genetic isolating mechanisms between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. coccineus Lam. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 16:39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirkov, T.E., J.M. Wahlstrom, K. Hagiwara, F. Finardi-Filho, S. Kjemtrup & M.J. Chrispeels. 1994. Evolutionary relationships among proteins in the phytohemagglutinin-arcelin-a-amylase inhibitor family of the common bean and its relatives. Plant Mol. Biol. 26:1103–1113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, D.W.S., M.C. Mok & A. Rabakoarihanta. 1978. Interspecific hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris with P. lunatus and P. acutifolius. Theor. Appl. Genet. 52:209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan, G.P. 1990. Wild Phaseolus ecogeography in the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico:areographic techniques for targeting and conserving species diversity. IBPGR, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan, G.P., J.W. Berry & C.W. Weber. 1980. Wild beans of the Greater Southwest: Phaseolus metcalfei and P. ritensis. Econ. Bot. 34:68–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B.M. & P.D. Ascher. 1984. Influence of parental lines on making Phaseolus vulgaris — P. acutifolius hybrids. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 27:40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nodari, R.O., S.M. Tsai, R.L. Gilbertson & P. Gepts. 1993. Towards an integrated linkage map of common bean. 2. Development of an RFLP-based linkage map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85:513–520.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ockendon, D.J., L. Currah & J.D. Taylor. 1982. Transfer of resistance to halo-blight (Pseudomonas phaseolicola) from Phaseolus vulgaris to P. coccineus. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 25:84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, T.C., D.C. Alexander, S.S.M. Sun, C. Cardona& F.A. Bliss. 1988. Insecticidal activity and lectin homology of arcelin seed protein. Science 240:207–210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, T.C., T. Blake, P. Gepts & F.A. Bliss. 1986. Bean arcelin. 2. Genetic variation, inheritance and linkage relationships of a novel seed protein of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71:847–855.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S.J. & B.N. Dhanvantari. 1984. Breeding for resistance to common bacterial blight in interspecific crosses between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. coccineus. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 27:179–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J.P. & T.E. Michaels. 1986. Genetic control over hybrid plant development in interspecific crosses between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. acutifolius A. Gray. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 29:22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, L.R. & T.K. Howe. 1984. Effects of water stress on the water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris and the drought resistant Phaseolus acutifolius. Physiol. Plant 60:197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernès, J. 1983. La génétique de la domestication des céréales. La Recherche 146:910–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A.C. & D.D. Davis. 1982. Yield response of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus acutifolius subjected to water stress. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 25:53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petzoldt, R. & M.H. Dickson. 1987. Interspecific hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris with P. angustissimus, P. filiformis and P. ritensis. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 30:94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pifíero, D. & L. Eguiarte. 1988. The origin and biosystematic status of Phaseolus coccineus subsp. polyanthus: electrophoretic evidence. Euphytica 37:199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, C.V. 1926. Studies in American Phaseolinae. Contr. US Nat. Herb. 22:663–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendota, K., J.P. Baudoin & R. Maréchal. 1982. Fertile allopolyploids from the cross Phaseolus acutifolius × P. vulgaris. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 17:177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pueyo, J.J. & A. Delgado Salinas. 1997. Presence of ∝-amylase inhibitor in some members of the subtribe Phaseolinae (Phaseoleae: Fabaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 84:79–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabakoarihanta, A., D.W.S. Mok & M.C. Mok. 1979. Fertilization and early embryo development in reciprocal interspecific crosses of Phaseolus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 54:55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. & P.G. Smith. 1953. Novel variation in tomato species hybrids. Amer. Nat. 87:359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinkel, C. & P. Gepts. 1988. Phaseolin diversity in the tepary bean, Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray. Plant Breed. 101:292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, V. & J.P. Baudoin. 1992. Screening for resistance to Ascochyta blight in populations of Phaseolus coccineus L. and P. polyanthus Greenman. Field Crops Res. 30:155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, V., J.P. Baudoin & B. Wathelet. 1991. Considerations about the taxonomical position of various taxa of the P. coccineus complex on the basis of seeds protein electrophoresis and experimental hybridizations. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 34:87–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, V. & D.G. Debouck. 1991. Observations on the origin of Phaseolus polyanthus Greenman. Econ. Bot. 45:345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, V., D.G. Debouck & J.P. Baudoin. 1996. Biogeographical and molecular observations on Phaseolus glabellus (Fabaceae, Phaseolinae) and its taxonomic status. Taxon 45:493–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, V., P. du Jardin, J.P. Baudoin & D.G. Debouck. 1993. Use of chloroplast DNA polymorphisms for the phylogenetic study of seven Phaseolus taxa including P. vulgaris and P. coccineus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:506–516.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K.A., M.E. Brothers & J.D. Kelly. 1997. Marker-assisted selection to improve drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci. 37:51–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, A. van & C. Cardona. 1982. Low levels of resistance to the Mexican bean weevil in dry beans. J. Econ. Entomol. 75:567–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, A. van, C. Cardona & J. Valor. 1983. Resistance to the bean weevil and the Mexican bean weevil (Coleoptera:Bruchidae) in noncultivated common bean accessions. J. Econ. Entomol. 76:1255–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, K. & W. Nagl. 1995. PCR amplification of the phaseolin-genes in 18 species of the genus Phaseolus. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 38:107–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shii, C.T., A. Rabakoarihanta, M.C. Mok & D.W.S. Mok. 1982. Embryo development in reciprocal crosses of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus Lam. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62:59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.P. 1992. Common bean improvement in the tropics. Plant Breed. Rev. 10:199–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.P., D.G. Debouck & W.M. Roca. 1997a. Successful interspecific hybridization between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. costaricensis Freytag & Debouck. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 40:40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.P., A. Molina & P. Gepts. 1995. Potential of wild common bean for seed yield improvement of cultivars in the tropics. Can J. Plant Sci. 75:807–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.P. & C.G. Muñoz. 1999. Resistance to common bacterial blight among Phaseolus species and common bean improvement. Crop Sci. 39:80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.P., W.M. Roca & D.G. Debouck. 1997b. Ampliación de la base genética de los cultivares de frijol: hibridación interespecífica en especies de Phaseolus. pp. 9–19. In S. P. Singh & O. Voysest (eds.), Taller de Mejoramiento de Frijol para el Siglo XXI: Bases para Una Estrategia para América Latina. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J. 1970. Interspecific hybridization between cultivated American species of the genus Phaseolus. Euphytica 19:480–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J. 1973. The possible status of Phaseolus coccineus L. ssp. darwinianus Hdz. X. et Miranda C. as a distinct species and cultigen of the genus Phaseolus. Euphytica 22:424–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J. 1976. Comparative evolution of pulse crops. Euphytica 25:139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J. 1979. Interspecific hybridization in the grain legumes — A review. Econ. Bot. 33:329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J. 1985. Evolution of grain legumes. IV. Pulses in the genus Phaseolus. Expl. Agric. 21:193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J. 1988. Morphological, physiological and biochemical changes in Phaseolus beans under domestication, pp. 143–161. In P. Gepts (ed.), Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J. 1990. Vavilov’s Law of Homologous Series and de novo crop plant domestication. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 39:27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J. & N. Haq. 1972. Fertility and segregation of the amphidiploid Phaseolus vulgaris L. × P. coccineus L. and its behaviour in backcrosses. Euphytica 21:496–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt, J., N. Haq & M. Nassar. 1974. The production of interspecific hybrids using Phaseolus coccineus L. as seed parent. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 17:80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, J.R. 1993. White mold (Sclerotinia) resistance identified in national bean nursery. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 36:178–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J.G. & G. Freytag. 1986. Predicting interspecific compatibilities in beans (Phaseolus) by seed protein electrophoresis. Euphytica 35:201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.V. & J.G. Waines. 1980. Interspecific hybridization between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. acutifolius. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 23:75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.V. & J.G. Waines. 1984. Fertile backcross and allotetraploid plants from crosses between tepary beans and common beans. J. Hered. 75:93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. 1964. Investigations into the inter-relationships of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus L. Genetica 35:59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tohme, J., D.O. Gonzalez, S. Beebe & M.C. Duque. 1996. AFLP analysis of gene pools of a wild bean core collection. Crop Sci. 36:1375–1384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toro Ch. O., L. Lareo & D.G. Debouck. 1993. Observations on a noteworthy wild lima bean, Phaseolus lunatus L., from Colombia. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 36:53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, I. 1928. Plantae cubenses novae vel rariores a clo. Er. L. Ekman lectae. IV. Symbolae Antillanae 9:433–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valladares, N., D.P. Coyne, M.L. Schuster & B. Hoff. 1977. Reaction of Phaseolus germplasm to different strains of Xanthomonas phaseoli and X. phaseoli var.fuscans. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 20:74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov, N.I. 1922. The law of homologous series in variation. J. Genet. 12:47–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdcourt, B. 1970. Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoideae for the flora of tropical East Africa. IV. Kew Bull. 24:507–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J.R. 1970. Experimental introgression in the genus Phaseolus. I. Effect of mating systems on interspecific gene flow. Evolution 24:356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J.R. & T.L. York. 1957. Inheritance of seedling cotyledon position in Phaseolus species. J. Hered. 48:71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weilenmann de Tau, E., J.P. Baudoin & R. Maréchal. 1986. Obtention d’allopolyploïdes fertiles chez le croisement entre Phaseolus vulgaris et Phaseolus filiformis. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 21:35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, E. 1974. Pulses in Ethiopia, their taxonomy and agricultural significance. Agr. Res. Rpt. No. 815. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm de Mosbach, E. 1992. Botánica Indígena de Chile. Editorial Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R.E. 1983. Incorporation of Phaseolus coccineus germplasm may facilitate production of high yielding P. vulgaris lines. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 26:28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, M., G.F. Freytag & R.E. Wilkinson. 1985. Evaluation for bacterial blight resistance in beans. Phytopathology 75:1032–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, D. & W. Nagl. 1998. Interspecific microsatellite-primed PCR analysis in twenty different Phaseolus species. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improv. Coop. 41:109–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), A.A. 6713, Cali, Colombia, USA

    Daniel G. Debouck

Authors
  1. Daniel G. Debouck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Idaho, Kimberly, USA

    Shree P. Singh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Debouck, D.G. (1999). Diversity in Phaseolus Species in Relation to the Common Bean. In: Singh, S.P. (eds) Common Bean Improvement in the Twenty-First Century. Developments in Plant Breeding, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9211-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9211-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5293-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9211-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation