Abstract
Techniques for the numerical solution of optimal control problems can be broadly divided into direct methods and indirect methods (Bock, 1978; Stryk and Bulirsch, 1992). In the direct method, the state and control variables are parameterized using a piecewise polynomial approximation, or global expansion (Nagurka and Yen, 1990). Inserting these approximations into the cost functional, dynamic equations, constraints and boundary conditions leads to a static parameter optimization problem. This chapter will develop a direct method using the results presented in Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bock, H. G., Numerical solution of nonlinear multipoint boundary value problems with application to optimal control, ZAMM, 1978, 58, T407—T409.
Dissanyake, M., Goh, C. J., and Phan-Thein, N., Time optimal control trajectories for robot manipulators, Robotica, 9, 131–138, 1991.
Fabien, B. C., An extended penalty function approach to the numerical solution of optimal control problems, Optimal Control Applications & Methods, 17, 341— 355, 1996.
Fabien, B. C., Some tools for the direct solution of optimal control problems, Advances in Engineering Software, 29, 45–61, 1998.
Goh, C. J. and Teo, K. L., MISER: a FORTRAN program for solving optimal control problems, Adv. Eng. Software, 1988, 10, 319–322.
Jacobson, D. H. and Lele, M. M., A transformation technique for optimal control problems with state variable inequality constraints, IEEE Trans. AC, 1969, 14, 457–460.
Kirk, D. E., Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction, Prentice-Hall, 1970.
Kraft, D., Algorithm 733: TOMP-Fortran modules for optimal control calculations, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 1994, 20, 262–307.
Lasdon, L. S., Waren, A. D. and Rice, R. K., Interior penalty method for inequality constrained optimal control problems, IEEE Trans. AC, 1967, 12, 388–395.
Nagurka, M. L. and Yen, V., Fourier-based optimal control of nonlinear dynamic systems, ASME Trans. Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, 1990, 112, 17–26.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. and Flannery, B. P., Numnerical Recipes in C, Cambridge, 1992.
Schwartz, A. L., Theory and Implementation of Numerical Methods based on Runge-Kutta Integration for Solving Optimal Control Problems. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1989
Shimizu, K. and Ito, S., Constrained optimization in Hilbert space and a generalized dual quasi-newton algorithm for state-constrained optimal control problems, IEEE Trans. AC, 1994, 39, 982–986.
Snyman, J. A., Frangos, C. and Yavin, Y., Penalty function solutions to optimal control problems with general constraints via a dynamic optimization method, Computers Math. Applic., 1992, 23, 47–55.
Stryk, O. and Bulirsch, R., Direct and indirect methods for trajectory optimization, Annals Oper. Research, 1992, 37, 357–373.
Watson, L. T. and Haftka, R. T., Modern homotopy methods in optimization. Comp. Meth. in Appl. Mech. & Eng., 1989, 74, 289–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agrawal, S.K., Fabien, B.C. (1999). Dynamic Optimization: Direct Solution. In: Optimization of Dynamic Systems. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 70. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9149-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9149-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5205-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9149-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive